Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Bogliacci]

ECF 414
View attachment 8289522
View attachment 8289523

Preservation should be denied!!! But if its not... it should be THEY who shall be preserving!!!!

 

[The Man With No Name]

No stalker child, YOU will preserve records.

This is one of the weakest AI filings yet, really reads like he just asked it to "read this filing and respond by saying no it's their fault"

 

[Lord of the Large Pants]

Prediction: Russ is going to delete the evidence, then argue that the preservation order wasn't AKSHULLY in effect because he had opposed it, so it was totes paused, gaiz.

 

[The Un-Clit]

ECF 414
View attachment 8289522
View attachment 8289523

Yup. We all knew this was coming. And it's chock-full of classic Greee plightsperging.

Unable to identify any substantive defect in Plaintiff’s copyright claims

You fucking wish, shitlips.

He's trying SO hard to pull attention away from his financial fuckery by screaming 'hey, copyright case! copyright!!' and dodge the fact that the test of copyright isn't even going to happen if the judge confirms he's busted on the IFP issue and tosses the case.

 

[Catboy Ranch Dressing]

"It's irrelevant if I lied on my IFP request, because it was 5 years ago and I paid the fee, anyway. No, you can't see it."

And he's still kicking and screaming, refusing to do anything Hardin asks regardless of how minor. Filing motions and responses for every single email Hardin sends him.

 

[FamicomGorby]

Greer thinks sending whores money is "reasonable consumer spending" and insists that Hardin doesn't have all the facts so he shouldn't be obligated to preserve those facts.

Also insists again that his copyright case is airtight which is why Hardin is doing this, despite Greer's inability to present any evidence or witnesses of any kind.

 

[obsdj]

Ha ha ha, he didn't even take the weekend to calm down and think about it. Awesome.

 

[BoomerPrime]

ECF 414
View attachment 8289522

"In fact, I think it is YOOOU who should preserve your records."

This fucking guy.

One of you legal Kiwis correct me if I'm wrong, but am I recalling correctly that he needed to pay the fee when he was immediately able to, or inform the court that his status changed once he wasn't 'poor' again?

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Greer has browbeat an AI into just spitting out, 'No u' as a legal filing.
What a time to be alive.

 

[Catgirls are Love]

This latest filing reads just like "My IFP status at the time was proper because I say so; no, I won't provide any evidence to prove that and please don't think about any of the times I've been caught lying to courts before".

 

[DavidS877]

We've got Kaaaaaahhhhhnnnnntent.
414 Images

Spoiler: 6 pages

 

[goblin enby]

I'm not sure Greee even knows ECF 313 exists. It's ripe and ready to be ruled on but it is absolutely not settled. Hardin has made it clear multiple times that paying the filing fee this year doesn't negate any possible earlier fraud but Greee just acts like that has never ever been mentioned.

Oh also, by going on and on about speculation - now it's gonna be time for Hardin to introduce screenshots of hooker venmos into the court record.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I'm not sure Greee even knows ECF 313 exists. It's ripe and ready to be ruled on but it is absolutely not settled. Hardin has made it clear multiple times that paying the filing fee this year doesn't negate any possible earlier fraud but Greee just acts like that has never ever been mentioned.

Oh also, by going on and on about speculation - now it's gonna be time for Hardin to introduce screenshots of hooker venmos into the court record.

He has responded to it via a supplemental authority (not an actual vehicle for a response)

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.utd.148809/gov.uscourts.utd.148809.323.0.pdf

This "response" shows that he did not understand what Mr. Hardin was asking (no surprise)

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

- "and seeks extraordinary relief"

it's a bog-standard preservation of evidence request... and the goblin plaintiff refused to do the needful without it.

-"not based on hindsight, later events, or discretionary personal expenditures."

the fuck does this even mean? Later events, okay, but hindsight? How else would one challenge a filing, except in hindsight? And "discretionary personal expenditures"? I'm pretty sure that could have a real impact on whether someone is a pauper. If you are taking in money, you have to explain why you don't have it, beyond saying "it's personal." You can have totally private personal finances or IFP status, not both.

"Plaintiff remained responsible for Utah rent, advance Nevada housing costs, U-Haul and moving expenses, and ordinary living expenses associated with a cross-state relocation"

Did plaintiff also spend thousands of dollars on whores and forget to mention it here? Because that's probably what Hardin is trying to ascertain

Greer still seems wholly ignorant of the fact that his cute little IFP maneuver that he was so used to employing may be the sword that will finally fall on his case. I only worry whether the judge will care enough about the word "shall" to make that happen.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Oh Russ, you not so beautiful bastard. You didn't disappoint, outside not being able to file a single damn thing on time.

"Ya honah, see I had deez billz n sheeeeeeeeeeeit. Ain't no judge gonna sit dere n say "Gimpa got billz n sheeeeeeeeeit so he ain't gone pay fees? Guilty motha fucka!" cuz if I do dat then I'ma do shit that's illegal n sheeeeeeeeeeeeit! You wan me break da law, ya honah? I didn't think so, bitch!"

Like...the dumb fucking mouth breather admits by his own account that he had money but he wanted to say he had no money so he could pay for a fucking U-haul so he could be, presumably, closer to paid sex. Why? Why in the ever loving hell would you admit that as some sort of excuse? Does the fact that I can turn my head and sip soup blind me to the answer?

and directly below that

"In fact it was YOUR fault, stupid court, for not telling me I had to be poor forever!"

 

[Hunter Hearst Helmsley]

V. If Any Preservation Order Is Warranted, It Should Run to Defendants’ Ability toSatisfy Willful Copyright Damages

Defendants’ motion is particularly misplaced given the nature of Plaintiff’s claims. This is a copyright action alleging willful infringement, for which statutory damages, enhanced damages, and attorneys’ fees may be available under 17 U.S.C. §§ 504–505. If the Court were inclined to consider a preservation order at all, the relevant concern would not be Plaintiff’s personal consumer spending from years ago, but rather Defendants’ ability to satisfy a potential judgment, including willful copyright damages.

You hear that judges? No more reducing sanctions. Null will need that money to pay Greer damages eventually.

 

[obsdj]

Do my eyes deceive me, or is this AIslop filing completely bereft of any caselaw citations whatsoever?

 

[DiabeticSydePhil]

'Should cabin' is that a common law phrase? There's no way Russ picked that turn at random, AI maybe?

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

View attachment 8289618
"In fact it was YOUR fault, stupid court, for not telling me I had to be poor forever!"

And he misses the point completely (maybe intentionally). Getting more money later was cured by paying the filing fees. The problem is whether his original IFP application was legitimate- or fraudulent.

I'm betting those lawyers have got Russle's phone number blocked and his emails redirected to their spam folder at this point.

I imagine they have them redirected to a specific folder that won't be auto deleted. When dealing with someone like Russ, you want all the evidence available for the future.

 

[East_Clintwood]

so he could pay for a fucking U-haul so he could be, presumably, closer to paid sex.

It's actually much dumber than that. Moving to Vegas was all part of his masterplan, along with spending another several grand on hiring musicians to do the actual performing, to audition for AGT so he could woo Heidi Klum with a song he wrote for her.