Culture Andy Serkis’ ‘Animal Farm’ Trailer Promises Bright Colors, Fart Jokes, and Literary Treason - Finally, the creative purity Orwell’s tyrannical editors wouldn’t allow in the original version.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/2025/12/12/animal-farm-trailer
https://archive.ph/xDMrH
December 12, 2025 Jordan Ruimy

This looks bad, really bad.

It’s quite obvious now why no distributor wanted to touch this one, until faith-based studio Angel picked it up. The end result is literary treason — Andy Serkis’ “Animal Farm” is nothing like George Orwell’s book.

The trailer leans hard into its bright, sparkling, and almost whimsical nature; it’s a bold stylistic choice, and certainly one way to sell Orwell to a seven-year-old.

Serkis’ animated adaptation of Orwell’s “Animal Farm” has been a passion project of his for nearly 15 years. With a screenplay by Nicholas Stoller (“The Muppets”), the film has a cast which includes Seth Rogen, Steve Buscemi, Glenn Close, Kieran Culkin, Woody Harrelson, Kathleen Turner, and Serkis himself.

Adapting “Animal Farm” has always been a challenge; its subtlety, layered meaning, and dark tone make it difficult to translate to screen. However, Serkis, known for pushing performance capture and digital storytelling forward, might have made a far worse version than anyone could have ever imagined.

It should be mentioned that “Animal Farm” screened at the Annecy Film Festival in June. Critical reaction was muted. Audiences were underwhelmed by its tonal shift from Orwell’s bleak satire toward a more family-friendly narrative. Oh, and apparently Serkis inserted lots of flatulence? The film veers in an unexpectedly juvenile direction—including, notably, fart jokes. The decision to inject lowbrow humor into such weighty source material is rather baffling.

Somehow, Warner Bros. gave the green light to Serkis’ expensive ‘Hunt for Gollum,’ set to shoot next year— it’s not too late to back out. Before tackling “Animal Farm,” Serkis’ directing work included “Mowgli: Legend of the Jungle” and “Venom: Let There Be Carnage.”
 
Andy Serkis should have kept to playing niggers like gollum.
 
I agree. Reframing Animal Farm as a kid's comedy is incredibly tone deaf and jarring.
It's deliberate: "why should I read the book, I've seen the movie!"
"Yeah but the movie is nothing like the book?"
"They always say that!" *rolls eyes*

They want any criticism of socialism either banned or memory holed.
 
What even is the point of remaking animated classics in korean 3d animation slop shops? This looks like dogshit, even if it followed the source material it would still be dog shit aesthetically.
 
Serkis’ animated adaptation of Orwell’s “Animal Farm” has been a passion project of his for nearly 15 years.
Just another way to tell people that you've always been retarded.
Reframing Animal Farm as a kid's comedy is incredibly tone deaf and jarring.
Soon... soon...
1765573088900.png
 
Last edited:
I can almost guarantee it'll be re-framed as a criticism of capitalism, and there'll be a 100 articles on why that re-framing is a good thing and smug leftoids squealing about how the original was always a criticism of power not communism.
 
The allegorical fable about Stalinism now has fart and small dick jokes.

Most Jewish thing I've read this week.
 
Potentially you could do the style where the film starts idealistic and becomes incredibly gruesome and disturbing by the end, but media today is too limp dicked to do something this bold.
Somehow, Warner Bros. gave the green light to Serkis’ expensive ‘Hunt for Gollum,’ set to shoot next year
I hope this Gollum film does the same to WB (or whoever buys them) as it did to Daedalic Entertainment
 
It's a pity because Andy Serkis' job tends to be good.

They want any criticism of socialism either banned or memory holed.
Those same "they"s have always tried to claim Orwell as a socialist whenever we use his job to show any criticism of socialism. You'd think that they'd like to portray his work exactly as it was for that same reason, right?

I agree. Reframing Animal Farm as a kid's comedy is incredibly tone deaf and jarring.
It's not for kids, though. This is for childish adults.
 
I can almost guarantee it'll be re-framed as a criticism of capitalism, and there'll be a 100 articles on why that re-framing is a good thing and smug leftoids squealing about how the original was always a criticism of power not communism.

If you watch the trailer (no hard feelings if you don't, not everyone is a masochist) they seem to have some human villains added. Some woman (who is white and blond, huh) who seems to be leading Napoleon along and help him make the Farm into the dictatorship it becomes in the book. We also see a bunch of people visit the farm to see the animals which also directly flies on the face of the original trying to keep humans out of the story (and most of those visiting people are brown, huh).
 
I don't get it. If he wanted to do a fun "animals take over the farm" movie, there's plenty of scope there: Just mash up Babe with Zootopia and throw in some Far Side jokes. Just call it something else or you'll look like a fucking retard.
 
Back
Top Bottom