Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[BIG BILL HELL'S]

Hardin's last email detailing in plain English why Huber is now a witness caused me to reflect on something I was thinking about earlier today: It isn't that Greeeeee is intellectually incapable of knowing why this is happening (and in general why it seems like the court is ganging up on him), it's that he's not really capable of grasping the basic fact that anything he writes in his paperwork is subject to challenge by his opponent. The dots simply don't connect that:

1. I mentioned Huber in a filing, therefore
2. the opposition has an opportunity to depose him to see if what I'm saying is true.

It's not a lack of intellect, because even a midwit-at-best like Rusty can reasonably easily understand cause and effect. There's got to be some sort of mental illness involved, although of what kind I'm not really sure.

And as was discovered and pointed out, Russell's 'update' to his LLC almost certainly is him, to use another analogy trying to close the barn door after the horse has bolted by way of removing 'W.H.' as a director. Fortunately, the eyes of Autism are always on the shitlipped sex-pest suing our Dear Sneeder and if he tries to claim W.H. had nothing to do with his LLC, the truth is forever on the Farms for Hardin to show yet again what a lying scheming prick the Brothel Prince is, trying to hide facts from the court like (analogy hat-trick!) a little kid with cookies in his hand caught trying to bury the wrappers deep in the garbage.

I presume that the Secretary of State would provide, upon request, a complete history of ID LLC to Hardin, including any changes to the corporate structure vis-à-vis board members.

When fuckface inevitably sues Ms Banks, I really hope he considers doing whatever it takes to represent her.

I'm assuming something very funny would happen, and I am eager to witness that.

 

[HackerX]

Mr. Greer didn't just open the door. His recent spazzing out has given Hardin the keys to every door in the entire kingdom that we are aware of.
Are there secret doors still locked that we don't know about yet?
We'll have to wait for Mr. Greer's future GPT filings to find out more. Russell should sue AI next, for unlocking all the fucking doors!

It's only a matter of time until Russ sues OpenAI, or whatever platform he's using, for losing his copyright lawsuit and transforming it into a tell-all expose.

 

[Your Starter for 10]

There's got to be some sort of mental illness involved, although of what kind I'm not really sure.

It's called acute lolcowism. Unfortunately it's not terminal, quite the opposite in fact, it leads to a prolonged, uncanny existence.

 

[Kosher Dill]

About all this witness stuff, how would it actually work if the judges miraculously decided to do something?
Like, let's say they decide to address the IFP fraud. Can Hardin actually insist on having a day in court and calling his witnesses in-person, or is it up to the judges how much of a "real trial" they want to have on these pre-trial issues?

Or put another way, if the judges say "This isn't IFP fraud" and try to sweep it all under the rug, can Hardin successfully demand his day in court to argue otherwise?
(I suppose the same question could be asked of Greer, but I think he knows hearings aren't his strong suit)

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

There's got to be some sort of mental illness involved, although of what kind I'm not really sure.

He has literally never been opposed in his life before, not by someone who has sunk his teeth in and won't fucking let go!

Even the cases he lost, with real lawyers and opponents, they basically wanted Greer to go fucking away and were willing to drop or otherwise get out once that was accomplished.

(I've always thought that Null getting out of Ricky's failsuit immediately and properly was a bit of a misstep, but that was back before he had the resources to fight back. The wally-world law strategy is the proper one for someone in his position, scorched earth is the only possible response.)

It can't be bargained with, it can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity! Or remorse or fear and it absolutely will not stop!... ever... until you are dead!​

About all this witness stuff, how would it actually work if the judges miraculously decided to do something?
Like, let's say they decide to address the IFP fraud. Can Hardin actually insist on having a day in court and calling his witnesses in-person, or is it up to the judges how much of a "real trial" they want to have on these pre-trial issues?

Or put another way, if the judges say "This isn't IFP fraud" and try to sweep it all under the rug, can Hardin successfully demand his day in court to argue otherwise?

I believe Hardin can strongly argue for IFP fraud, but since it is fraud on the court and not really directly on Null, the court can shove itself up its own ass and decide not to do anything.

HOWEVER, that doesn't apply to direct attacks against Null or Hardin, so a sneaky snake could do a slippery gym and cause it to come 'round ...

 

[mindlessobserver]

It's not a lack of intellect, because even a midwit-at-best like Rusty can reasonably easily understand cause and effect. There's got to be some sort of mental illness involved, although of what kind I'm not really sure.

Its impossible to layman diagnose this. But it could be Borderline Personality Disorder, or full blown Psychopathy. Borderline being "Not quite a Psychopath, but similar". The common trait of true Psychopaths is not that they are unfeeling monsters. Psychopaths absolutely feel emotion. The issue is that their emotions are superficial and "in the moment". They don't "think" about them. They "Act" on them. To get what they want. A Psychopath is constantly, forever, in the moment. With no future, and no past. Just the now. An endless now. Where what is needed to do is what is done, to get what is wanted, now.

Greer may legit be a Psychopath.

 

[DumbDude43]

Hardin's last email detailing in plain English why Huber is now a witness caused me to reflect on something I was thinking about earlier today: It isn't that Greeeeee is intellectually incapable of knowing why this is happening (and in general why it seems like the court is ganging up on him), it's that he's not really capable of grasping the basic fact that anything he writes in his paperwork is subject to challenge by his opponent. The dots simply don't connect that:

1. I mentioned Huber in a filing, therefore
2. the opposition has an opportunity to depose him to see if what I'm saying is true.

It's not a lack of intellect, because even a midwit-at-best like Rusty can reasonably easily understand cause and effect. There's got to be some sort of mental illness involved, although of what kind I'm not really sure.

he feels he is entitled to dictating the narrative as he sees fit, and the court is supposed to rule based on that alone.
when the judges don't blindly follow and accept the narrative he presents, he thinks they must be stupid and he just has to explain it better until they understand it better.
and when somone outright contradicts or challenges his narrative, that's not supposed to happen, that's not allowed, that's breaking the rules. hence why he's lashing out at hardin, he feels like hardin is violating his rights by doing that.

not sure what to call this attitude. narcissistic delusion or something like that, idk.

 

[Unknown God]

It's called acute lolcowism. Unfortunately it's not terminal, quite the opposite in fact, it leads to a prolonged, uncanny existence.

The even simpler explanation: he is malicious. He understands all of this, he just chooses of his own volition to act in bad faith.

 

[DragoonSierra]

ECF 404
View attachment 8268080

Huber is now a witness

View attachment 8268088
View attachment 8268089

That explanation was way too helpful to Russ. Hardin shouldn't be too generous. But I guess you have to explain it to the tard to get it through his thick skull

 

[HackerX]

That explanation was way too helpful to Russ. Hardin shouldn't be too generous. But I guess you have to explain it to the tard to get it through his thick skull

Doesn't really help all that much. FFS, Russ didn't know about the show cause order before Hardin reminded him the day before and Russ went "I don't have to show cause. Go away and stop harassing me!!!"

 

[Accept Only Substitutes]

Its impossible to layman diagnose this. But it could be Borderline Personality Disorder, or full blown Psychopathy. Borderline being "Not quite a Psychopath, but similar". The common trait of true Psychopaths is not that they are unfeeling monsters. Psychopaths absolutely feel emotion. The issue is that their emotions are superficial and "in the moment". They don't "think" about them. They "Act" on them. To get what they want. A Psychopath is constantly, forever, in the moment. With no future, and no past. Just the now. An endless now. Where what is needed to do is what is done, to get what is wanted, now.

Greer may legit be a Psychopath.

I'm absolutely convinced that he has a cluster B disorder. Which one is up for debate, because there are a lot of symptom overlaps and co-morbidities once you get into mental health issues. It's not an exact science.

 

[kcbbq]

If I ever had to deal with Russhole in court for some reason, if I couldn't get Hardin, I'd definitely pick a female lawyer because they cause him to melt down.

The condescending way he treated the lawyer when he sued AGT was straight out of a bad movie.

 

[MadDisaster]

I know Hardin is doing this at a discount, but I hope he does get a boost in reputation. He certainly deserves it. He comes off as an excellent advocate for his client, very clever, and dedicated. It's great to watch, even as a layperson - like watching a great chess player against a particularly malicious sentient shit pile.

 

[mindlessobserver]

I know Hardin is doing this at a discount, but I hope he does get a boost in reputation. He certainly deserves it. He comes off as an excellent advocate for his client, very clever, and dedicated. It's great to watch, even as a layperson - like watching a great chess player against a particularly malicious sentient shit pile.

He can probably unironically add vexatious litigation defense too his CV. At this point he's probably the leading subject matter expert on it, having done extensive litigation with vexatious litigants in both the 4th and 10th federal districts.

 

[not william stenchever]

Are there secret doors still locked that we don't know about yet?

Find out next time on ChatGreeeeePT!

 

[HackerX]

He can probably unironically add vexatious litigation defense too his CV. At this point he's probably the leading subject matter expert on it, having done extensive litigation with vexatious litigants in both the 4th and 10th federal districts.

I wish I could put bullying retards on my resume.

 

[RodgerDodger]

About all this witness stuff, how would it actually work if the judges miraculously decided to do something?
Like, let's say they decide to address the IFP fraud. Can Hardin actually insist on having a day in court and calling his witnesses in-person, or is it up to the judges how much of a "real trial" they want to have on these pre-trial issues?

Or put another way, if the judges say "This isn't IFP fraud" and try to sweep it all under the rug, can Hardin successfully demand his day in court to argue otherwise?
(I suppose the same question could be asked of Greer, but I think he knows hearings aren't his strong suit)

The killshot on the IFP Fraud remains the Nevada brothel case that he filed non IFP the same month. His excuse for filing IFP is literally "well I had 2 cases to file. But only enough cash that week to pay for one. And if I waited until payday the statute of limitations would have passed for the KF case". You'll note he could not be seen as Informa Pauperis in the case where he was trying to force somebody to give him a brothel.

And OH Boy is that IFP fraud.

 

[Billy Bong]

It's only a matter of time until Russ sues OpenAI, or whatever platform he's using, for losing his copyright lawsuit and transforming it into a tell-all expose.

And leaving it a 1 star review

OK no more goofing. Back to being informative and legal. We try to stay on track, but OMG this latest flurry of filings has been completely insane. We should be allowed to goof a bit.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Mr Huber wins the dubious distinction of being the first fully disclosed witness in this suit. (5 years and 4 witnesses in)

Minor quibble with Hardin's disclosure though: in the Scope of Knowledge, he didn't explicitly say anything about misconduct or the DQ argument. That is the presumptive reason he pulled the trigger on adding Huber, it should have at least got a mention in the official disclosure rather than the explanations to Greer.

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

I believe Hardin can strongly argue for IFP fraud, but since it is fraud on the court and not really directly on Null, the court can shove itself up its own ass and decide not to do anything.

Considering that IFP Fraud is a "Shall" dismiss with prejudice issue, they literally can't dismiss it out of hand. If they did, it would be a serious error that could be taken to appeal very easily.