US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
if the files are as bad as some think it is then many in Congress would be in a pickle, either vote against it and face accusations for the rest of your career that you are hiding something or vote for it and implicate you and possibly your friends, the vote isnt going to be on Partisan lines at all, there’s going to be some sitting reps who arent there and have everything to gain by voting on it, they know that people are going to protest at the very least so they are trying to mitigate that, hell they may just cut their loses and break up big tech with twitter becoming the standard oil of the 2020s they have probably figured out consolidation of the web is a double edged sword
This might be an excellent opportunity to purge the uniparty. You just know those niggas did some awful shit.
 
If "Trump sucked off Billy Clinton's Billy" is the best they had then I don't think they have much to worry about.
Jeffery Epstein said Trump sucked off Bill.

You know, because sucking dick can only ever be used in the English language as explicitly referring to a sex act and not anything else, such as overt flattery or eager cooperation.
 
Jeffery Epstein said Trump sucked off Bill.

You know, because sucking dick can only ever be used in the English language as explicitly referring to a sex act and not anything else, such as overt flattery or eager cooperation.
His brother (who wrote the email in question) said that “Bubba” did not refer to Clinton.
 
Wait, limey is a slur?? Next thing you're gonna tell me is that calling the Bri'ish "bongs" or the Irish "micks" or "Paddies" are also slurs. I won't stand for that!
one time it was a question on Jeopardy!
forget if it was "Limey is a slur for these people" "who are brits" or "this slur for brits is rich in vitamin c" "what is limey"
 
if the files are as bad as some think it is then many in Congress would be in a pickle, either vote against it and face accusations for the rest of your career that you are hiding something or vote for it and implicate you and possibly your friends, the vote isnt going to be on Partisan lines at all, there’s going to be some sitting reps who arent there and have everything to gain by voting on it, they know that people are going to protest at the very least so they are trying to mitigate that, hell they may just cut their loses and break up big tech with twitter becoming the standard oil of the 2020s they have probably figured out consolidation of the web is a double edged sword
The real threat is the public seeing how much of official policy was directly influenced by sexual favors. The recent leak meant to hurt Trump inadvertently took down Larry Summers and exposed possible pay-for-play with China when he was just trying to get laid (while he was Treasury Secretary).
 
Jeffery Epstein said Trump sucked off Bill.

You know, because sucking dick can only ever be used in the English language as explicitly referring to a sex act and not anything else, such as overt flattery or eager cooperation.
"THE PEDOPHILE WE ALL HATE IS SAYING THINGS THAT REINFORCES OUR BIAS, TRULY HE MUST BE TRUSTWORTHY NOW!" I just don't get their cope man. I'm not even saying Trump didn't so something awful, I don't fucking know. But also would I trust KNOWN fucking pedo and monster Jeffrey Epstein, who's DEAD, and this info is based on an email he sent while colluding with people who hate Trump?! It's paper thin so far.

If we get something solid showing Trump did something, yeah, let's fucking go. But so far it's been more "HONEY GET IN HERE AND BRING YOUR BOYFRIEND, WE FINALLY GOT HIM!" again.
 
Mike Gallagher had a cute joke about how today really is historic due to what's happening related to Epstein
Massie will actually vote WITH the republicans on something! Clearly a history-making event!
 
"THE PEDOPHILE WE ALL HATE IS SAYING THINGS THAT REINFORCES OUR BIAS, TRULY HE MUST BE TRUSTWORTHY NOW!" I just don't get their cope man. I'm not even saying Trump didn't so something awful, I don't fucking know. But also would I trust KNOWN fucking pedo and monster Jeffrey Epstein, who's DEAD, and this info is based on an email he sent while colluding with people who hate Trump?! It's paper thin so far.

If we get something solid showing Trump did something, yeah, let's fucking go. But so far it's been more "HONEY GET IN HERE AND BRING YOUR BOYFRIEND, WE FINALLY GOT HIM!" again.
It would be unironically the best time for those on the left (or right) to release the documents, even if it involves them in some way. People are so deep in the "my team vs. your team" that they might defend them on the basis of "Yeah, we have pedos but at least they are not nazis!".

I'm still interested but I don't expect much plus Epstein is burning in hell.
 
A bunch of "right-wing" Twitter grifters are saying that abolishing property taxes is bad and only benefits boomers:
1763478204870.png
Source (Archive)

1763478968216.png
Source (Archive)

DeSantis, to his credit, is destroying them:
1763478390974.png
Source (Archive)

1763478218572.png
Source (Archive)

1763478265968.png
Source (Archive)

1763478293032.png
Source (Archive)

but seriously, just because someone else benefits from a policy doesn't mean that you don't also benefit. In this case, because of existing senior property tax exemptions and maximum yearly rate increases, abolishing property tax disproportionately benefits the young, not the old.

1763478364255.png
Source (Archive)

Why are they talking like leftists arguing that income tax cuts for everyone are bad because the rich are included in "everyone"?

1763478859625.png

"You should be priced out of your home because the city government needs to funnel billions of dollars to NGOs run by their friends. We can't possibly cut any spending."
"No one needs that much space, sell your family home you worked half your life to pay for and go live in a retirement home where you'll be murdered by the third-world nurses after they deplete your life savings"
"Young families actually benefit by paying thousands of dollars a year in taxes on their home"

They have to have been bought off, probably by some leftist group that knows that there will be no city-level slush funds for them to pilfer anymore without property tax.

1763478244344.png
Source (Archive)

Based:
1763478922208.png
Source (Archive)
 
Back
Top Bottom