💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 170 24.3%

  • Total voters
    700
The fact he spent money like that is why he can't rub 2 cents together
He had his basic needs covered by the trust fund, but went full blown nigger rich the moment the YouTube money started rolling in.

There are plenty of big purchases ofc
  • Crustang
  • SUV
  • Antique fire truck or whatever rotting away in the front yard
  • Nanny
  • $5k snack budget
  • $70k paintings
  • $20k coke budget
But I bet the small purchases and frivolous spending added up to even more. Probably door dashing daily, buying every trinket or piece of clothing that catches their eye, frequent visits to bars/restaurants/gay 90s.


I did almost the exact same thing when I was young and started making real money, but I didn’t have a trust fund or 5 kids, and I didn’t blow up my career and my backup 3 years later.
 
1763320126721.png 1763320139033.png
Nick realising the ongoing PR disaster, belatedly and vaguely indicated his support for NateTheLawyer's recovery.
However, his efforts are very half-hearted, simply retweeting the well-wishes of others, leeching off their own genuine support.

Where's your own words, Nick? Are you so petty you can't summon a few keypresses for a man who went into brain surgery last night while you embarrassed a charity?
 
Last edited:
I wrote a post today (and never posted it) wondering what kind of legal protection Kurt could even request against Nick’s harassment.
Nick isn’t harassing him and Kurt hasn’t given the slightest indication that he’s bothered or wants to go legal. Talking like this might give people the impression Kurt gives a shit, when the only one who’s emotionally invested in this is Nick.
 
If you wanted to help some kids, maybe don't invite Nick Rekieta, the guy who, being as charitable to him as possible, is a child neglecting junkie.
100% this. Runkle can bury his head in the sand all he wants, but it's a shit look to have an unrepentant child-abuser on your stream TO HELP CHIDLREN.

You can't just pretend that "Oh I didn't know!" It's your flipping stream, your flipping channel, your cause you're backing. Maybe be an adult and do some vetting, especially as you could see the heat on X and other platforms aimed at Nick. Aside from Nick's shit behavior on Runkle's stream, the optics were not good. Nick behaved as he has on about every stream, post coke-stream (and many would argue as he acted before it)- as a petulant, narcissistic child who has to be the center of attention.

Runkle got what he earned and deserved. Unfortunately, those sick kids did not.

He could try, but Nick would counterclaim and likely win. As insufferable as he is, it probably reaches into fair use. It would more likely get taken down for harassment, though.
I'm not sure Nick's "content" with Kurt is transformative enough, but I don't know if it would be worth the squeeze. However, going after Nick via YouTube terms of service would be much more likely to succeed, and Nick would have little recourse, unless he could con Celeste into funding a lawsuit against Alphabet, but good luck with that, faggot.

One additional wrinkle, YouTube is apparently adding likeness rights as some sort of terms of service measure in the near future. Going to be a nuke on the commentary community, but Kurt could also go that route.
 
It's entirely possible that Runkle grossly miscalculated Nick's draw as a guest, and that the additional audience would contribute more toward his goal, or whatever.

Given that he was easily able to overlook Nick's completely psychotic behavior and bring him on just shows you what kind of "people" these are.

They have no values. They have no morals. They just respond to overwhelming negative feedback as if they had just discovered that they crossed a line accidentally.

Also, look at this fucking guy. You expect him to have a spine?
I’m starting to think that since Nick publicly invited himself onto the stream, Runkle figured it might be the lesser of two problems to just let him on for ten minutes rather than deal with one of Nick’s inevitable meltdowns about "lawtube" and how he wasn’t invited to the charity stream.

Either way, invite him on or don’t, Runkle was cornered into Nick being a problem for him regardless.
 
They have no values. They have no morals. They just respond to overwhelming negative feedback as if they had just discovered that they crossed a line accidentally.

Also, look at this fucking guy. You expect him to have a spine?
Dude, just say lawyer. Saves a fuckton of typing.
 
1763320858682.png
"Noooooooo Stalker Child, barging into a charity stream and then making a soliloquy about the chat telling me to fuck off wasn't inserting myself in front of poor dying children! Enjoy Prison!"
1763320986591.png
Nick, in his new schizo arc, states that declaring that he'd only fuck women like Eugenia Cooney was actually an altruistic plea for men to have higher physical standards.
Where would you place Brixton "icedancer" Yorker on this list, Nick?
 
Last edited:
He had his basic needs covered by the trust fund, but went full blown nigger rich the moment the YouTube money started rolling in.

There are plenty of big purchases ofc
  • Crustang
  • SUV
  • Antique fire truck or whatever rotting away in the front yard
  • Nanny
  • $5k snack budget
  • $70k paintings
  • $20k coke budget
But I bet the small purchases and frivolous spending added up to even more. Probably door dashing daily, buying every trinket or piece of clothing that catches their eye, frequent visits to bars/restaurants/gay 90s.


I did almost the exact same thing when I was young and started making real money, but I didn’t have a trust fund or 5 kids, and I didn’t blow up my career and my backup 3 years later.
As something of a clothes person, from a long line of clothes people (and knowing the haute/snobby attitudes of Nick and Kayla to assume nothing was ever second hand) their collection of clothes is absolutely jawdropping and must have cost a staggering amount. Most will probably never be worn more than once. And these junkies still couldn't ensure their poor kids were wearing clean ones.
 
1763322593676.png
(L / A)
Mike "Mersh" Schiele is allegedly going to be on RekietaLaw tonight, watching "Cooking With Kurt" alongside Nick.
I wonder how long Mersh's "excitement" will be maintained as he is forced to watch several hours of Nick's uncontained glee at "some guy cooking".
I also wonder if Ralph has anything to say.
 
He had his basic needs covered by the trust fund, but went full blown nigger rich the moment the YouTube money started rolling in.

There are plenty of big purchases ofc
  • Crustang
  • SUV
  • Antique fire truck or whatever rotting away in the front yard
  • Nanny
  • $5k snack budget
  • $70k paintings
  • $20k coke budget
But I bet the small purchases and frivolous spending added up to even more. Probably door dashing daily, buying every trinket or piece of clothing that catches their eye, frequent visits to bars/restaurants/gay 90s.


I did almost the exact same thing when I was young and started making real money, but I didn’t have a trust fund or 5 kids, and I didn’t blow up my career and my backup 3 years later.
I haven't put this up in the thread yet, but I looked up some more of Nick's purchases a while ago. The most retarded one was a "Samsung steam vertical washer." Based on Nick's description, it seems to be the "Bespoke Airdresser" and it had a retail price of between $1100-1900 at the time Nick talked about it. It's intended for steam cleaning of suits or dresses.
1763322337238.png

Alex Murdaugh Double Murder Trial Day 10 - On and On We Go (February 7th, 2023)
at 7:45:46
Price comes from pricechecker.wtf Archive

Not massive news, but I wanted to make sure that it is archived just in case. It is also a bit retarded to buy a dresser for suits that you never wear while you keep all other clothes on the floor
 
View attachment 8177370
(L / A)
Mike "Mersh" Schiele is allegedly going to be on RekietaLaw tonight, watching "Cooking With Kurt" alongside Nick.
Anyone who licks the inside of Nick Rekieta's toilet bowl either literally or figuratively just for a crumb of attention it gives you deserves the life ruination performing the act culminates in.
 
Cooking with Kurt is never going to be a success, Nick. Bringing on Mersh of all people to co-host isn't going to help.

He's burning what little is left of his audience trying impotently to bully Kurt. Because Kurt...said the warrant was solid? I don't even remember the ACTUAL reason Nick is so mad at Kurt, behinds Kurt being a balldo apostate and an easy target.
 
View attachment 8177370
(L / A)
Mike "Mersh" Schiele is allegedly going to be on RekietaLaw tonight, watching "Cooking With Kurt" alongside Nick.
I’m sure that streaming “Cooking with Kurt™” alongside Mersh is precisely what Rekieta "Law" needs to revive his channel. After all, who wouldn’t want to watch a show featuring a silent stroke victim and a junkie who isn’t authorized to practice law, both mocking a practicing lawyer’s cooking skills? Truly, a remarkable niche waiting to be filled.
 
Back
Top Bottom