So then what about the people like the Democrat House Oversight Committee that purposefully murking up the investigation? They're protecting pedophiles in my book just as much as Israel is by playing political bullshit games. If anything, they're protecting pedos just as much as Israel is. Do they deserve the same justice?
no she said on the record at her disposition she never saw him. What would be the reason for her covering for him while under oath?
stop fucking lying to people. she said that she worked at mar-a-lago in 2000 and had met trump multiple times, and that she never saw him doing anything with any epstein clients, don't fucking lie. that's why you're not quoting her.
Maybe you're confusing it for when they were asking about seeing Trump at any of Epstein's properties, but she has stated she's met him and had nothing to report in regards to flirting or making advances. https://lawandcrime.com/high-profil...er-embellished-many-donald-trump-connections/
She didn't lie. This email was made up bullshit. It's a nothingburger.
i actually don't think that's the case. i think these emails are real, and very much not particularly harmful to trump, considering what they show is that he was not happy with them for fucking with the girls at mar a lago, and that he did actually ban them both. it also confirms that epstein had no evidence of trump doing anything, because as virginia herself says, he used the video tapes to blackmail people, and wolff and epstein have now been caught colluding on implying that there were epstein tapes.
trump was never a client of jeffrey epstein. they knew each other socially because epstein bought a house 2 miles from mar a lago and they were socially friendly. they both also owned property in NY and FL, so there was travel overlap. trump's statement that he cut off epstein in 2007 seems to be fairly strongly confirmed by these emails, specifically when he says trump asked him to resign but he was never a member, and that he specifically asked ghislaine to stop doing something, presumably trying to find underage prostitutes at his clubs.
How are they murking up the investigation?
Trump's own words were that he cut ties with Epstein because Epstein "stole" an employee from him. That's it. You're only doing this to cope with the fact that you've made glazing a politican your entire personality over the past 8 years and now it turns out that guy is a pedo. And as I've said before, even if he admitted to it all, you would still continue to glaze him.
It's going to be so funny when it turns out that Epstein was cozy with the Democrats and working with Obama.
Now the question, why the hype and 180. Why give Maxwell a sweetheart deal. If he wasn't on the list why is he doing what he can to suppress it. The entire fiasco has been a clear black eye to him and has only furthered the preexisting suspicions that he was an Epstein client.
yes, and i don't believe trump is always telling the truth about everything. if what epstein implies in the documents is true, they did not have any evidence trump was a pedo. you can sit here and cope about this all you want, but these emails are nothing, hulkster. they're just not anything. epstein is clearly seen A. not behaving friendly toward Trump, B. not colluding with him in any way but in fact colluding AGAINST him, and C. confirmed that he was indeed banned from mar a lago. i don't have to believe everything trump says to not think he's an outright pedophile.
She hasn't been given a sweetheart deal by Trump. That's something the Democrats made up. Someone else in the system did that. And Trump's stopping the release because it's a distraction from the big issues, immigration and the economy (also it would likely collapse the economy, which is already in a precarious spot). That last reason is probably at least part of why Pedo Joe didn't release them either
i don't know, but maybe israel. that's definitely one of my thoughts on it too.
maxwell was sentenced under the biden admin in 2022, i don't know what you're talking about.
honestly no idea, and it's one of my biggest personal critiques. but it's absolutely retarded to assume he's on it when the democrats had all this information in the DOJ for 4 years and did fucking nothing with it.
anybody who believes wholeheartedly that he was a client of epstein's sexual businesses is ignoring the evidence in these very emails. if he was, why would epstein need to lightly imply a tape? he'd have one. virginia herself confirmed that's how epstein worked. he had a collection of tapes that he used to blackmail people, and in this case, he and wolff are implying they don't have anything like that.
a known victim who literally testified in multiple places, including her own personal memoire, that he never did anything to her, and she never knew of him doing anything to other women. are you stupid or something? virginia was someone he knew, she fucking worked for him in 2000. i love how you got blown the fuck out about the earlier cope so now you're moving to this one. just fucking quit while you're ahead, faggot.
no, that's actually a takeaway that requires assumptions you have no evidence of. the simplest assumption is that all the evidence you have seen, every piece of it, keeps telling you that he did not actually fuck any children, and there is no evidence of it, but there was an attempt by jeffrey epstein to make it seem like he had, confirmed.
God damn you’re the most 75 IQ MAGAmutt I’ve ever read the writing of.
Where do the emails confirm Trump's reasoning?
There's talk about commuting her sentence, isn't there? Allegedly the DOJ is working with her on it. Unless it's an immunity deal to get dirt on people I've got no clue what the benefit is.
i forgot when trump was president in 2022, and in charge of merrick garland's department of justice.
no, it was literally a rumor started by randos and then when trump was asked about it live he handwaved it the same way he handwaves everything he has no knowledge of at the time, and there hasn't been another word about it, nor moves from the justice department to do so.