Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[The Dude]

This case has been going for over 700 years. I don't believe "fool" fully captures the essence here.

C'mon everybody, you all know the words!

This is the case that doesn't end! Yes, it goes on and on, my friend! Some retard started filing it, not knowing what it was! And he'll continue filing it forever, just because this is the case that doesn't end! Yes, it goes on and on, my friend! Some retard started filing it, not knowing what it was! And he'll continue filing it forever, just because this is the case that doesn't end! Yes, it goes on and on, my friend! Some retard started filing it, not knowing what it was! And he'll continue filing it forever, just because...

 

[RodgerDodger]

This case has been going for over 700 years. I don't believe "fool" fully captures the essence here.

That's because of all the time travel that the 10th Circuit allowed.

 

[The Dude]

That's because of all the time travel that the 10th Circuit allowed.

When is Russhole going to try to add Doc Brown and Doctor Who as witnesses for the plaintiff?

 

[oh no its pipkun]

To make it go away. Why would anyone want to have this millstone around their neck for longer than necessary?

how is it a millstone for the judge? he gets paid whether or not this suit proceeds. its a millstone for lolcow llc because it has to address and correct greeeee's record.

 

[Kosher Dill]

I'm cautiously optimistic this time. I don't think the District Judge likes being bothered.

It's really a coin flip who he considers responsible for the botherment though.

 

[Disgruntled Pupper]

I'm cautiously optimistic this time. I don't think the District Judge likes being bothered.

View attachment 8105794

Is that one of the Bush brothers? No wonder he tardgaurds, he looks genetically deficient himself.
Edit: He wears his glasses in the same way Greer does. Jfc go to the Walmart eye glass counter and they'll bend your glasses so they're even with your different ear/eye planes so one lense isn't hovering over your temple

 

[Watching Rekieta]

That's because of all the time travel that the 10th Circuit allowed.

And don't forget, Greeee's brilliant bit of Pro Se argumentum ad iidiot got the 10th Circuit to accommodate where dead people live. Before this case, who knew that Utah was actually where the damned were sent and not Florida??

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

He actually has a Wikipedia page.

Ohh, he's got cred (I mean his school and work history, not the fact of the page).

Is that one of the Bush brothers? No wonder he tardgaurds, he looks genetically deficient himself.
Edit: He wears his glasses in the same way Greer does. Jfc go to the Walmart eye glass counter and they'll bend your glasses so they're even with your different ear/eye planes so one lense isn't hovering over your temple
View attachment 8106696

I legit had those glasses in 1994. Battered and bent Armanis that might still be around someplace unless I finally purged them and have forgotten.

But they are sitting straight on his face, so not like Greer. (His left ear is higher than the right, so either you have them parallel to the ground (his are) by bending the arm differently so one side sits higher vs the ear, or you bring them down on both ears and they sit cockeyed on the face. His choice is superior.)

 

[Irene and 22 others]

The twelve most terrifying words in the Lolcow Litigation subforum are "I'm District Judge David Barlow, and I'm here to handle the motion."

Hopefully, shitlips gets to have the ruling he deserves.

 

[RodgerDodger]

And don't forget, Greeee's brilliant bit of Pro Se argumentum ad iidiot got the 10th Circuit to accommodate where dead people live. Before this case, who knew that Utah was actually where the damned were sent and not Florida??

I'm pretty sure Florida is where the damned come from.

 

[DragoonSierra]

I'm pretty sure Florida is where the damned come from.

Too much sun down there for the undead

 

[Debbie Macomber]

Last time, Barlow broke the law for Russ by not even letting Hardin respond before knocking the rightful sanction down from $5,000 to $1,000, even saying he knew that's far less than what was owed (again, against the law) but did it out of an abundance of mercy for Russell.

Russhole's response was "How about $74 until I can appeal your unjust ruling?"

And you can tell Barlow was pissed because in his denial, he even reminded Russ that he already gave him a hefty reduction he knew wouldn't make the defendants whole. More than any other logic about "first sanction" "in forma pauperis" or "stipulation", I think Barlow won't help Russell this time just because he's pissed Russell wasn't grateful for the last discount and slapped him in the face by asking for an additional 90% reduction of the 80% reduction until he appeals.

I suspect he's pissed off Bennett too by going over his head to tattle to Barlow AGAIN and then the very next day, begging for mercy after YET ANOTHER missed deadline, asking if he can retroactively file asking for yet another extension on providing the document instead of sanctions, or else tell him no sanctions AND he never provides the document!

 

[Dumbledore's Onlyfans]

Last time, Barlow broke the law for Russ by not even letting Hardin respond before knocking the rightful sanction down from $5,000 to $1,000, even saying he knew that's far less than what was owed (again, against the law) but did it out of an abundance of mercy for Russell.

Russhole's response was "How about $74 until I can appeal your unjust ruling?"

And you can tell Barlow was pissed because in his denial, he even reminded Russ that he already gave him a hefty reduction he knew wouldn't make the defendants whole. More than any other logic about "first sanction" "in forma pauperis" or "stipulation", I think Barlow won't help Russell this time just because he's pissed Russell wasn't grateful for the last discount and slapped him in the face by asking for an additional 90% reduction of the 80% reduction until he appeals.

I suspect he's pissed off Bennett too by going over his head to tattle to Barlow AGAIN and then the very next day, begging for mercy after YET ANOTHER missed deadline, asking if he can retroactively file asking for yet another extension on providing the document instead of sanctions, or else tell him no sanctions AND he never provides the document!

In addition, I think they're BOTH pissed that Gree ignored their helpful video tutorial about restraining orders and what they mean, and he STILL hasn't produced the restraining order application that he was DIRECTLY ordered to produce months ago. Nothing pisses off judges more than ignoring them when they're actively trying to help you.

 

[obsdj]

and he STILL hasn't produced the restraining order application that he was DIRECTLY ordered to produce months ago.

And it's guaranteed he STILL hasn't taken any further steps to do so, even though it has been over two weeks since he begged for thirty more days to get it.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

And it's guaranteed he STILL hasn't taken any further steps to do so, even though it has been over two weeks since he begged for thirty more days to get it.

100% if the extension's granted, he'll beg for another 2 week extension because "Plaintiff honestly thought it was 30 days from being granted, not 30 days from the date requested" and then when he misses that due date "Plaintiff honestly thought the case was paused until the judge decided if the due date was 30 days from requested or granted, and that even if the Judge said no, he'd get new due dates" and even after that, he already hedged his bets to begin with by asking for 30 days "but Utah courts warned plaintiff it might take more than 30 days"

 

[.iota.]

What's the oldest still pending motion the court is ignoring currently?

technically, i think that it would be mr. hardin's motion to impose case-ending sanctions (ecf 196):

Greer was at least kind of specific with the info he wanted in the subpeona he tried serving while discovery is still stayed, though not sure why he thinks the site would actually have their names.
View attachment 8073309

speaking of which, we're still awaiting a ruling on mr. hardin's motion for sanctions on that (ecf 330):

Has he ever subpoenaed anyone? I don't even mean attempting or perfecting service, just getting as far as creating the documentation?
Given his outrage over Hardin even daring to begin to depose Greer's witnesses, I'd love to know what he thinks a subpoena actually is.
Can you subpoena a ho to suck you your penis?

almost, and while lying to the court clerks about it, too! as mentioned above, we're awaiting a ruling on mr. hardin's motion for sanctions for that itty, bitty little stunt. the judges may have forgotten about it, but i doubt that the clerks have.

I'm actually hoping Barlow has questions, and requests that Hardin respond. Because that would give Hardin a chance to counter the Magistrates belief that no harm was done to the defendant. And tell Barlow Point Blank that the case came back to him from Florida due to Greer lying about his "eager to testify" dead witness. Which was used to deny the defense their appropriate venue.

don't forget about greee's other "REAL" and "eager" witness ... his father. steve taylor and the elderly mr. greer were the only two witnesses named in greee's re-transfer document.


greee claimed that his father could not travel, which is interesting because we've since learned that his father lives in wyoming, not in utah. it's even more interesting since we've also learned that greee's father is about as "eager" as steve taylor is to testify, that he only learned that he was a witness after being contacted by mr. hardin, and that he likely wants nothing to do with his shame of an adopted son's courtroom shenanigans. or, as mr. hardin states (ecf 196):

 

[CEO of Gay]

When is Russhole going to try to add Doc Brown and Doctor Who as witnesses for the plaintiff?

If either new Greee existed, they would go back in time to alter history to ensure he didn't.

 

[obsdj]

technically, i think that it would be mr. hardin's motion to impose case-ending sanctions (ecf 196):

No, that was ruled on, and it was denied.

The oldest still-unruled-on item really is the most recent motion to dismiss at 274, which was in April. Of course then in September, Hardin suggested that the judges hold off on ruling on it until Cox v. Sony gets resolved. (Possibly to keep discovery closed as long as possible? Because discovery is stayed until that motion is ruled on.)

 

[4090 Chad]

It’s over for Greee



Article

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

Damn, he might have to familiarise himself with his own fucking case.

Looks like plightsperging is back on the menu, boys!