Well the point is that Nick is trying to rebrand himself as "Trump Critical / Anti-Peter Thiel".
The biggest uphill battle here is that his Trump Critical points are either:
- Completely untrue: In the Trump Review section of the video. He claims we have not received any deportation figures in 6 months. When the fact is we do get a massive amount of information concerning not only deportation but (self deportation, border crossings, arrests at the border, ICE detainees, etc...). The result of this is that anyone informed on the real politics of the world and is not a loser who gets all their news from Nick can see that it is not criticism but instead, out-in-out anti-Trump propaganda.
- Anti-Win stance / Demoralization: Whenever something good happens or something that the right voted for gets enacted, Nick is always there to tell you not to believe your lying eyes and to not celebrate your wins. For example, in Nick's mind, we are completely controlled by Israel and will go to war for them 100 times out of 100. But then the perfect situation strikes, (literally) Israel strikes Iran in the midst of our negotiations. Did we go to war with them, did a single American solider die, or did Trump pull off a master-class of poltical and military strategy and successfully descalate the situation to the point where America gets everything we want, and Israel loses everything they want, (Their Iron Dome shown to the world as imperfect, no regime change, and no war with Iran). But people like Nick would have you believe that this means that, you lose.
- Never Enough / Moving Goalposts: Any gain towards what the right wants is never enough. Nick seems to think that instead of making gains and inroads with the American people across all spectrums, (Which Trump has with the highest Latino and Black vote in Republican history with it only growing as we push further rightward), we should just jump into the deepend with no-laws enacted, no hearts and minds won over, no political inroads made, and no lasting iron clad hard to remove changes impleted. Instead of a Run-don't-Walk falacy of the Turtle and the Hare, Nick has the idea of Teleport to pulto and wait for everyone else to want to come over while you tell them to fuck-off and you hate them.
- Nick has the same mindset as the Neo-Cons "Lose with Dignity": Instead of seeing the deportation of Anti-Isreal immigrants as what it actually is, (an amazing excuse to deport more 3rd worlders and anti-Whites [because they do conflate Israelies with Whites] out of America. With bipartisan support), Nick would like to keep the Antifa Soros puppets in America to continue to brainwash the young masses in college to ruin their lives. (And yes that one student who was tied to British intelligence was very old compared to his fellow students. Anyone with a brain knows that his real job was as a political recruiter and saboteur of America's youth.) But because they said something anti-Jew we should never deport them. If an illegal screams "Free Palestine!" we should not be allowed to deport them. This is the AF mindset.
Charles or Nick (Sam's friend not the gay kid in his basement), really needs to take Sam aside and tell him that he is doing the same self-destructive actions that got their show canceled. Sam hangs around many unfunny low-T Zoomers that worship the ground he walks on. The issue is that Sam, someone with no wife and children, wants to feel young and hang with the Zoomer crowd. These people are very likely pushing Sam to make his poltical podcast like show as we all know every Zoomer at one-point thinks they should get into poltical podcasting. These people also probably sold Sam a bag of shit when they compared Nick's deplatforming (something very suspicious since if he really was blacklisted, then why doesn't YT or other hosting sites pull down videos he stars in on their site.) to his own Blacklisting. Sam probably felt some sort of kinship with this and decided to do this interview months ago, (since Nick does not bring up Tucker Carlson we can assume this to be fact. Especially since Nick's ego is so inflated it would have been the main topic dejour.)
Sam really does need to decide if he wants to go down this poltics route if so, he should start to challenge his guests or do more research on them. Because after watching his show a few times the most he ever does is unfunny remarks or non-sequeters and never makes any insights or challenges at all, UNLESS the guest is complimenting a people/group he does not like, for example, his boomer episode is the only time I heard him correcting a guest and getting mad when she disagreed. Sam does not have the chops to be a political figure for the masses and is relying on Zoomers to superimpose their entire belief system on him, much like they do with Nick.
