Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
Greer v. Moon
2:20-cv-00647— District Court, D. Utah
Docket No.
2:20-cv-00647
Court
District Court, D. Utah
Filed
Sep 15, 2020
Terminated
Apr 22, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:0501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Aug 6, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Aug 6, 2024
Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113
May 15, 2024
ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112
Apr 28, 2024
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111
Apr 25, 2024
Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024)
NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)
Greer v. Moon
21-4128— Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Docket No.
21-4128
Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Filed
Oct 26, 2021
Nature of Suit
3820 Copyright
Last Filing
Oct 15, 2023
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 11)
#
Date
Description
Filing
10010936535
Oct 15, 2023
Case termination for opinion
10010794067
Jan 5, 2023
[10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785
Jan 2, 2023
[10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728
Dec 1, 2022
[10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140
Nov 30, 2022
[10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]
GREER v. MOON
3:24-cv-00122— District Court, N.D. Florida
Docket No.
3:24-cv-00122
Court
District Court, N.D. Florida
Filed
Mar 19, 2024
Terminated
Jun 10, 2024
Nature of Suit
820 Copyright
Cause
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
None
Last Filing
Oct 16, 2024
Parties (4)
Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 30)
#
Date
Description
Filing
—
Oct 16, 2024
ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132
Oct 15, 2024
Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024)
AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024)
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469
Apr 13, 2026
MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026)
Incidentally I still maintain that stipulation was too weak and won't hold up. Greer does not have the integrity or the mental capacity to abide by voluntary agreements to his detriment.
If memory serves, part of why Barlow gave him an 80% discount on sanctions is because the stipulation was already set to hurt him enough. If this fucking faggot goes back on it to re-energize the tard shield, this clown show that Utah calls a court of law will have reached a new low.
That failure to discern is a Russ problem, not a CCing problem. Pretty sure I can discern a legal reason, but in the spirit of not helping Russell, I'll save it for later.
Piss-poor argument from Russell, because facing sanctions should encourage him to think twice before wasting people's time and money with his bullshit filings. If it doesn't chill, it hasn't worked.
He really needs to get the AI output checked over by someone who knows what he's doing, like, say, a lawyer.
At what point is a writ of mandamus warranted for violating your rights when the judges have been bending so far backwards to appease this retard where in any other circumstance this case would have been thrown out 100 times already?
While the court didn't specifically mention a response to Greer's response, if we hold Mr. Hardin's filing as a motion, then Mr. Hardin should have 14 days to respond to this Greer response.
As someone who uses AI regularly, I knew this would happen from the moment he submitted his first filing utilizing it.
Even for a normal smart individual, AI is often tricky to reign in and keep on the right track. You have to have a rough idea of the way it "thinks" so you can guide it towards the output you want. Takes trial and error. It was obvious to me that after a few filings the model would start sperging out and Russell would be too stupid to notice/fix it. Trial and error is a foreign concept to him.
It would appear that Russell is inadvertently training the model to think and come to conclusions the same (broken) way he does. RussGPT could be fun to play with.
What he is saying there is that the amount needs to be doubled, at least, before it would act as a deterrent. I would agree with that. They should try at least $10K
I think this is an example of Greee using terms he doesn't understand. Back when he insisted that his father and brother might have pertinent information, Hardin contacted them, and Greee immediately told his father and brother not to speak with Hardin. At the time, we didn't know the family was a dry well, so we called it witness tampering. And then Greer revealed they weren't proper witnesses, so the issue was dropped.
I think Rusty, in an attempt to smear Hardin, is accusing him of witness intimidation, likely because Pa/Bro Greer was shocked to get a phone call from a lawyer. Greer probably included that contact in his prompt, and this is what the AI spat out.
The court has ordered this sanction. It's now down to amount and approval from the district court judge.
The other one has not had a sanctions order filed but Greeeeee was Ordered to Show Cause that he shouldn't be sanctioned which is what he asked to file late. If the court finds his cause lacking then they'll order the sanction and presumably ask for the amount that it cost defendants from Mr. Hardin or other possible outcomes.
That's the weak part. Nothing Hardin gets from them would be worth Greer getting to call witnesses. I wish Hardin had included an automatic sanction for going back on the stip.
They are now "recanted witnesses", which is a new one to me. As far as I can tell that refers to a witness who did give testimony but later recanted it.
I don't think Greer can recant his own offering of a witness, or that a witness can become "former" without actually being a witness in some way. But what do I know, I didn't get a J.D. in Clown World Law.
If the court finds his cause lacking then they'll order the sanction and presumably ask for the amount that it cost defendants from Mr. Hardin or other possible outcomes.
In at least six months from now, meanwhile filings will continue to pile up because gREEEEEE is a retard who insists on picking a slap fight with a real lawyer who doesn't have a choice to not participate in said slap fight. What a mess and the judges have only themselves to blame.
They are now "recanted witnesses", which is a new one to me. As far as I can tell that refers to a witness who did give testimony but later recanted it.
I believe you are correct on the nomenclature. I think the correct term would be "withdrawn potential witnesses", unless at that time the witness list had been finalized. Then I believe it would properly be "withdrawn witness"
Piss-poor argument from Russell, because facing sanctions should encourage him to think twice before wasting people's time and money with his bullshit filings. If it doesn't chill, it hasn't worked.
Completely agree. Why would anyone think it's perfectly fine for those slobbering cunt to run up somebody else's legal costs with his witless amateur hour fuckery, yet he should be exempt from the consequences of any financial damage that his behaviour incurs? There's no logical reason why the fact that he's representing himself should mitigate those costs. If anything, you could make the case that that's more of a reason to impose severe financial sanctions on him. By attempting to save money on legal costs, he's ramping up his opponents legal fees. How can that possibly be fair or equitable?
While the court didn't specifically mention a response to Greer's response, if we hold Mr. Hardin's filing as a motion, then Mr. Hardin should have 14 days to respond to this Greer response.
As per usual, I hope he does, because as we've discussed, the judges need reminding of the facts of the case and can't be trusted to remember on their own despite the record being before them.
Nothing? You sure about that? Think about the "under penalty of perjury" milk that would flow from just those two individuals, on the record. Just imagine the humiliation, the burst blood vessels, the greasy hair torn out by the roots on the part of our pro se plaintiff.
