Dumb Shit on Wikipedia / Wikimedia Contributor General

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Checked some controversial political pages, Grokipedia cites some...umm..."pro-white" sites like Counter-Currents. I'm willing to bet my nutsack that this doesn't escape the journoscum.

Edit:
1761645336894.png


OH SHIT OH FUCK PULL THE PLUG
 
Have to say, surprised at the references it cites. There's KiwiFarms, which is uncontroversial by normal means, but it seems it also cites defunct\seized sites like ropeculture.org and various ironmarch and daily stormer domains.
I just know this is going to increase pressure on archival sites to further ban content/resources they can archive and I suspect, this might be Musk's next venture. Archive.org, but based.
 
I checked if Grokipedia has something about Poland's favourite Judy Tester, and the heading is interesting:
judytester.png
Live version: here
Archive: here
 
1761649225438.png

Before it was revealed that HTSM was forced by the same people (0chan users, swinnycucks, and telegram pedos) who forced Terrible Mouse.
 
The lyrics of "Ram Ranch," released on August 8, 2012, explicitly describe a scenario of multiple muscular cowboys engaging in homosexual acts at a fictional ranch, set to a heavy metal backing with spoken-word delivery.
Click to expand...
there's too much here that we could paste random links for weeks

elon also said it was going to be open source and i hope he keeps his word because i LOVE the minimalism and sleek design, it's brilliant. there's no source code yet though https://github.com/orgs/Grokipedia/repositories
 
Mound Dweller said:
Looking good I'd say
View attachment 8091382View attachment 8091391
I had a gander at the KF "article" as well, it's rather lengthy and gets a few things wrong, but it is leaps and bounds ahead of the hatchet job the regular wiki article is; no Something Awful! Honestly looks to be a good use of the technology; it's not creating anything new it's just compiling info, which is exactly what a glorified chatbot ought to be doing anyway.
Click to expand...
I gave a few niche articles across the site a read and I'm impressed.
This comports with Null's opinion on AGI. This really is just a much more easily controlled and less harmful troon/autist/pajeet.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Businesses_of_Donald_Trump_that_went_bankrupt
en.wikipedia.org

Racial views of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_contributors_to_Project_2025


this makes the CWCki look austere and restrained
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_protests_against_Donald_Trump - articles of this kind are usually used to give a day-by-day account of wars, not people in pussy hats
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deportation_of_Indian_nationals_under_Donald_Trump - DO NOT REDEEM THE VISA SAAAAR

except the CWCki would delete or merge half these articles as being irrelevant or minor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom