😵‍💫 Skitzocow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 402 71.8%

  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%

  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%

  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%
  • Total voters
    560
Mikemikev said:
Am I a chicken chicken?
Click to expand...
Hey, use whatever words you want. Just recall that five days ago, I asked if your intellectual depth was as shallow as it appeared to be, and in the intervening time, your actions have shown me that it is. You said I'd be given a chance to see you prove your mental gifts, and what you've proven is notably unimpressive.
 
Mikemikev said:
Calm down. I'm too tired right now.
Click to expand...

Tired.png
 
ChurchOfGodBear said:
Hey, use whatever words you want. Just recall that five days ago, I asked if your intellectual depth was as shallow as it appeared to be, and in the intervening time, your actions have shown me that it is. You said I'd be given a chance to see you prove your mental gifts, and what you've proven is notably unimpressive.
Click to expand...

Do you think another possibility is that my intellectual depth is just fine but I don't waste my time doing anything other than mocking dishonest pieces of shit?
 
Mikemikev said:
Do you think another possibility is that my intellectual depth is just fine but I don't waste my time doing anything other than mocking dishonest pieces of shit?
Click to expand...
Quite honestly, no, I do not think that is a possibility. I think between your predisposition to waste time and your total lack of understanding of basic concepts, we can rule that possibility out.
 
Mikemikev said:
Do you think another possibility is that my intellectual depth is just fine but I don't waste my time doing anything other than mocking dishonest pieces of shit?
Click to expand...

No, but I did come up with another possibility....

You lack a pair.
 
Mike is a dickless shitbag. I say we ignore all requests for a debate from him, as he is unworthy.
In any case, now we have enough evidence to prove he craps out of any chance to prove his views.
 
Facta, non verba, as they say. Except he can't use the verba so well, either. Pro tip: Because a usage is in the OED, the world's most comprehensive English dictionary, does not mean that it is either current or common. It merely means some people used it in print. Mike can't even grasp what dictionaries do. They document what people write. They don't tell you what good writing is.
 
Once again, I am going to declare @ChurchOfGodBear the winner by default.
Mike was too scared to come to the field of battle, regardless of how he dresses it up.

To the victor the spoils! Sell all this scrap iron shit on ebay!
iu
 
NobleGreyHorse said:
Facta, non verba, as they say. Except he can't use the verba so well, either. Pro tip: Because a usage is in the OED, the world's most comprehensive English dictionary, does not mean that it is either current or common. It merely means some people used it in print. Mike can't even grasp what dictionaries do. They document what people write. They don't tell you what good writing is.
Click to expand...

But remember, all academia is lousy Jew learning, so it doesn't count!
 
Mikemikev said:
So either I'm chicken chicken or stupid? And it's definitely not because I just don't like you?
Click to expand...

You make grandious statements, we ask you to back them up, you cite studies from 20s and 30s, we say use something more recent, then you challenge one of us to a "debate", we accept, then out of nowhere you create weird stipulations, we try to accommodate , you respond with excuses, then back off, and then with a false bravado you claim victory. Wash, rinse and repeat. The MikeMikev "debate cycle.
 
unclestryker said:
You make grandious statements, we ask you to back them up, you cite studies from 20s and 30s, we say use something more recent, then you challenge one of us to a "debate", we accept, then out of nowhere you create weird stipulations, we try to accommodate , you respond with excuses, then back off, and then with a false bravado you claim victory. Wash, rinse and repeat. The MikeMikev "debate cycle.
Click to expand...

That's pretty much it. In typical lolcow fashion, as long as he can tell himself he's awesome, nothing else matters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom