Should we outsource watching content to AI? Debate.

[All About Particles]

tbf, 90% of the speculation in this thread is inaccurate and people regard it as fun, even when it seeps into lore.

speculation does not pretend to be accurate information. the problem starts when AI shit is dressing up as information. which it is not.

 

[Botchy Galoop]

She notes how living abroad allowed her to pay off around $25,000 of debt due to cheaper expenses.

25k is all her debt? X to doubt.

She claims to have been paying $1700 per month. The math don't math. And she owed a lot more than $25,000.

Her 25k being paid over 36 months in sandy exile, maths out to about 695 dollars a munt. It is not clear which debt Chantal is paying off---her tax debt or her latest bankruptcy debt. Or have they been consolidated? Can you declare bankruptcy on tax debt in Canadia???

Mentions real fear of gun violence in the U.S., saying she’s “scared to travel there.”

Said from a warzone in Syria where nightly, "celebratory" gunfire can be heard. One day it may just rain down bullets onto Chantal's very large target of a head...

But no one else is doing it.

True that.

I come here for the witty banter.

Same.

I really miss the written summaries of old.

I miss Tangerine Dreams too.
As a Neo-Luddite who has never even owned a mobile phone, I hate all things AI. So far, my ability to detect the slop from human has been (as far as I know) pretty accurate, There is just something off about all things AI that raises the hair on the back of my neck.
However, like all things Internet, I acknowledge that AI is just a tool. I just hate that such a tool is put in the hands of those with bad intent.

Timestamps are needed.

THIS! SO MUCH. The ability to check for accuracy and perhaps pinpoint the location of funny clips or flat out lies is my concession to the AI kerfuffle here.
While I occasionally find @neger psykolog a bit annoying, I appreciate their effort in adding to what has been sorely lacking here. I get it. Very few of us have the time or masochistic bent to do the funny recap thingy.
So to neger, my thanks for at least spurring on this convo about the use of AI here and elsewhere on KF.

edited for the numerous spelling and grammatical errors that I apparently am unable to see until I post.

 

[autoerotic bus accident]

I don't even comprehend why people are trying to "fight" me on this - its a free service,

"Wahhhh, I don't understand why people are complaining about me bringing nothing of value to a thread to the point where I am a commonly muted user and then shitting the thread up with AI slop and forcing a debate about AI slop."

When something interesting happens, people summarize it. Several of us jumped in when she announced she was breaking up with Salah or when she fainted at the airport because it was actual content. People aren't summarizing right now in part because nothing is fucking happening. She's doing multiple streams a day of nothing because she wants money. And all she does is repeat herself: oh, she wants to go back to Canada because she misses fast food? Wow, that's really breaking news!!

Newsflash: it's not actually necessary to summarize five streams a day where Chantal says she misses Nashies. It's not necessary for humans to do it, and it's definitely not necessary for a flat, unfun, untransformative, uncritical, erroneous large language model to do it. Almost every one of her streams for the last week and a half has been functionally identical. But when something happens, people pay attention and at that time they watch and summarize, and ideally they bring their own voices and make us laugh while they're doing it. The AI stuff is just total chaff and should not be encouraged or become a regular feature. If you want to read it, generate and read it yourself.

Sansa calculated based on the number of streams Chantal shit out in September that she earned approximately $3,900 CAD that month, and that was before any superchats or extraneous grifting, so unfortunately her "repeat herself five times a day" strategy is working.

 

[Clotso Coof]

When something interesting happens, people summarize it.

And the clip channel reactors clip it and publicize it. See Piggy, Unicorn, etc. Then we'll sometimes repost a clip or go back and get a time stamp from the archived thread.

That's littered throughout this thread:

Timestamp: 1:10:36

Timestamp 28:40 in the above stream

People posting timestamps aren't always watching the entire stream themselves, instead often searching for moments they discover from clip channels. (Hat tip and thanks to above posters).

There are lawyers out there getting sanctioned by the bar, and judges resigning, because they used AI summaries and AI "case law" that turns out to be false. The legal AI summary searches are far more sophisticated than general Chat-GPT, but still "summarize" completely opposite and/or hallucinate things that didn't happen. Federal judges have decided based on fictional court cases. Quoted fictional plaintiffs.

I think we might want to have a poll about AI summaries, and AI in general in Beauty Parlour? Does Null have a general policy?

 

[neger psykolog]

Niggers MATI about modern version of Microsoft Word autosummarize feature

News at 9/11

N

Post in thread 'Should we outsource watching content to AI? Debate.'

Oct 19, 2025

Once we're hours past someone posting a 20 point AI-only summary of a 2 hr Chins stream, it's highly unlikely someone is going to return to her archived stream and spend all that time to post a custom detailed summary. Even if someone does it occasionally, it won't happen often.

Pretty soon, we'll have a series of significantly inaccurate AI slop destroying the record and lore. Farms has a good reputation for accuracy in the past because we've cared about getting it right.

Sorry friend but you're penultimately wrong here. I already set precedent on how to do this shit like 7 years...

• neger psykolog

Reactions: x 13 x 12 x 2 x 2 x 2 x 1 x 12 x 2

 

[lol cow supreme]

I know the value of posts like these because I used to make tons of similar ones in the DSP mega thread ages ago. Yes - they're imperfect but no one else is doing them.

Lol nigga acting like the DSP thread gives him some sort of street cred. You're posts are literally the worst on the entire site. Any time I see one in the community feature submissions thread I physically groan. You are a sticker farming parasite who uses AI to make the most bland, boring fucking shit that sucks absolute total ass. Your contributions are a net negative not only to the site but to the historical record of the human race. Not only are they imperfect, they are absolute fucking garbage. No one wants them. No one else is "doing them" because its fucking slop garbage. No one else was fucking your mother, so your dad thought to give it a try, and look what fucking happened. Take your AI masturbation sticker farming over to reddit, or tumblr.

But because "no one else is doing them" here is your beloved AI slop roasting you

Spoiler

you pathetic keyboard warrior hiding behind your "Neger Psykolog" handle like it's some clever Swedish pun on being a black shrink—newsflash: it's not, and neither are you. Joined Kiwi Farms back in 2017, huh? Dropping those limp-dick updates in the DarksydePhil thread, like that February 2018 edit where you breathlessly announce Phil's Twitch suspension as if you're Woodward and Bernstein instead of a forum drone. "Update: Phil admitted it!" Wow, groundbreaking journalism, bro. Your posts read like they were scraped from a Wikipedia stub and fed into ChatGPT on its laziest day—stiff, soulless, zero wit or edge. Just boring recaps of Twitter drama and forum confessions, as if anyone's dying for your secondhand slop.


We've got a whole thread history of your drudgery: popping up in Mystery Woman's saga to speculate on identities like a discount Null, or whining about VPN woes in the Ofcom saga, turning a regulatory clusterfuck into a personal tech support ticket. It's all so tediously formulaic—quote a tweet, archive a link, pat yourself on the back for "contributing." And don't get me started on the AI stench. Those posts scream generated garbage: repetitive phrasing, zero personality, like you couldn't be bothered to type with your own thumbs. Kiwi Farms is for sharp-tongued spergs who eviscerate lolcows with flair, not lazy bots churning out beige diarrhea.


You're the forum equivalent of elevator muzak—droning on, putting everyone to sleep. If you're gonna psyop us with your "psychologist" schtick, at least make it hurt. Instead, you're just filler, bloating threads with AI-farted fluff that no one asked for. Log off, touch grass, or better yet, get therapy for that creative void. Your history's a monument to mediocrity—delete your account and spare us the snooze-fest.

 

[neger psykolog]

Lol nigga acting like the DSP thread gives him some sort of street cred. You're posts are literally the worst on the entire site. Any time I see one in the community feature submissions thread I physically groan. You are a sticker farming parasite who uses AI to make the most bland, boring fucking shit that sucks absolute total ass. Your contributions are a net negative not only to the site but to the historical record of the human race. Not only are they imperfect, they are absolute fucking garbage. No one wants them. No one else is "doing them" because its fucking slop garbage. No one else was fucking your mother, so your dad thought to give it a try, and look what fucking happened. Take your AI masturbation sticker farming over to reddit, or tumblr.

But because "no one else is doing them" here is your beloved AI slop roasting you

Penultimate

 

[lol cow supreme]

Penultimate

Second to last? Maybe I used too many words. Your. Posts. Suck. Balls.

 

[neger psykolog]

Second to last? Maybe I used too many words. Your. Posts. Suck. Balls.

Burnellian

 

[Tread Miller]

They're AI generated summaries that take 15 seconds to make and are labeled as such.

Take them or leave them? If a particular point in them is interesting (like the part time job shit) then go through the video itself to confirm/analyze.

Wouldn't it be better for you to do this yourself before making the post? Anyways, while this (post an AI summary of a stream/long string of text and having others check it out to analyze it further) may be fine for bigger lolcows, I don't think this is really viable for more niche threads. For example, the two threads I've contributed to (SplatSource and Zengo) are quite niche to the point that I am basically the only contributor. Due to the nature of the drama for these two, I have to read through and give summaries for long streams/Discord logs/Google Docs/etc., and while I always try to include the original source + archive where I get the information from, I am pretty confident that the majority of people who read my posts in both threads will not check the original source themselves to analyze it further or give their take. If I were to start posting AI summaries alone, I don't think anyone would come back to the original stream, Discord log, Google Doc, etc. to double check and point out the funny moments from all the Ai "chaff," so to say.

 

[Bucephalus]

Go ahead Elizabeth Hubbard and message Null again about what a bully I am. I’m sure you’ll get another response like yesterday’s. Just don’t bother to tag me on the conversation this time, because I seriously don’t give a fuck and (clearly) neither does Null.

Here we go again you’re taking it out of context and I’m not gonna shit up the thread to explain it, well maybe a little, it wasn’t about the bully part it’s about two of my posts in a row responding to you in a simple, logical way disappeared (the first one and the one I wrote to replace it) and I thought you were a mod and that it wasnt right to delete things that called you out . Null replied it was to be handled in the beauty parlor as it was our space of our own that we requested and he wasn’t involved here anymore

ETA: Your mistake was thinking Null cared. My mistake was not screenshotting the conversation before leaving. I can guarantee though that (given the language used), Null didn’t use AI, or if he did he asked it to use every politically incorrect word on the planet.

I can provide screenshots to you via dm at your request and you can do whatever you want with them . But,! of course null didn’t use ai, what are you going on about? That’s a complete non sequiter. I didn’t use ai for posts here either, but you lumped me in with the other guy for some reason i thought just cause we were both retards and I’m ok with him using ai now I’m just confused By you going on about null not using ai when that’s a duh thing.
ETA
And why wouldn’t I confirm it? It’s real, it happened I’m not ashamed of it. Do you think I would lie and hide it the way somebody erased my posts? Screenshots available to any and all upon request

You were tagged so I wasn’t looking like a tattletale. I was doing it to your face so you would have a chance to respond and give your side and know exactly what was said and for it to be a fair discussion between adults.

I took it away from the forum cause it doesn’t belong here and then let it go when null responded and you are here still dragging it out and I feel forced to answer because you are misconstruing me in the forum. This argument is retarded and shitting up the forum and you reinstigated it when I had let it go.

get a room

 

[Maldemort]

That AI summary is more entertaining than any of her streams I’ve watched. I’m all for it!

Obviously cases where shit hits the fan or whatever and you want to watch, but there is definitely a positive use case for summarization like this.

 

[neger psykolog]

Neger is once again proven penultimate. No one wants to listen to 4 and half hours of Karl Jobst sperging. AI summaries, which are a glorified version of Microsoft Word 1997's summarize tool are the greatest thing to help distill long, stupid videos by faggots so more people can comprehend them.

N

🌟 Internet Famous Post in thread 'Karl Jobst / karljobst / FAQ_GOD / simthreat / approachhernow.com'

Oct 27, 2025

I think 4 hours of this guy talking would kill me.

lol @ the below thread - a mod moved my AI summaries of fatty Foodie Beauty into another thread because people in that thread were whining about AI bullshit. The AI summaries were really accurate even if they didn't understand the nuances and humor, they provided value and everyone else was wrong and I was right (and also penultimate)

The subtitles are still generating for the video, but once it is done I will save the subtitles and do a...

• neger psykolog

Reactions: x 5 x 2 x 2 x 1 x 3 x 1 x 1

 

[Ken Barlow]

You are neither as smart, nor as influential as you think you are.

 

[3MMA]

Is something really worth calling “content” if you don’t watch, read, or listen to it? My 1st instinct is that using AI in place of watching, listening, or reading something defeats the purpose of it being something called “content.” My real gripe is the overuse of calling anything & everything, “content.” That overuse came about as the term, content creator, was popularized over the last decade or so.

People huffing their own farts or just grifting, (same thing?) call their bullshit, content, in a reference to the fact that they made it. After all, they call themselves content creators, so they call everything they stream or record, content. This doesn’t make it good, or quality, & muddies the waters on that quality. Everything gets marketed as “must watch, quality content,” with the word, content, signaling effort has been put in, but the return on investment of time for the viewers is not enough. Usually the effort isn’t there from the creator & it eventually leads to less views.

This is what leads people to even want to use AI to keep up on certain things, over the pleasure of enjoying it themselves. It’s not enjoyable usually, people catch on, even if they don’t realize why, & in this way, AI becomes useful to save time & get a cliff notes, I guess. That’s part of what I use certain threads here for, to get a general understanding of something I would never sit & watch in full, like an average, 8 hour, Kino Casino stream.
ETA: typo

 

[Faggothunter99]

Holy shit, everyone complains about neger but Lol cow Supreme truly hit the mark. I’m putting him on my mute list out of respect to this godtier post

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

The only bots I want watching content with me.

 

[neger psykolog]

Is something really worth calling “content” if you don’t watch, read, or listen to it? My 1st instinct is that using AI in place of watching, listening, or reading something defeats the purpose of it being something called “content.” My real gripe is the overuse of calling anything & everything, “content.” That overuse came about as the term, content creator, was popularized over the last decade or so.

People huffing their own farts or just grifting, (same thing?) call their bullshit, content, in a reference to the fact that they made it. After all, they call themselves content creators, so they call everything they stream or record, content. This doesn’t make it good, or quality, & muddies the waters on that quality. Everything gets marketed as “must watch, quality content,” with the word, content, signaling effort has been put in, but the return on investment of time for the viewers is not enough. Usually the effort isn’t there from the creator & it eventually leads to less views.

This is what leads people to even want to use AI to keep up on certain things, over the pleasure of enjoying it themselves. It’s not enjoyable usually, people catch on, even if they don’t realize why, & in this way, AI becomes useful to save time & get a cliff notes, I guess. That’s part of what I use certain threads here for, to get a general understanding of something I would never sit & watch in full, like an average, 8 hour, Kino Casino stream.
ETA: typo

By the way the format of the AI summary is quite flexible. For instance I can ask it to insert time codes for specific topics so people can more easily go through the khantent of the video.

 

[Whatevermancer]

AI should create content, AI should watch content, AI should comment on content and AI should reply to comments on content.
Meanwhile humans should go outside and touch grass.