US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Warren is weird, because I've heard evidence of her having solid policy ideas, being willing to actually solve problems, and at times she seems like a completely fine politician. Then...
She was a lawyer. That's your answer.
Lawyers thrive in environments with neuroticism and pragmatism.
After all, even a slam dunk case can be torpedo'd if the judge personally dislikes you. Ideally not but lawyers are forced to live in a world of neurotic pragmatism.
 
I'm probably one of the only posters here who thinks the Confederate worship by conservatives is fucking stupid. I don't think we should remove statues and change the names of stuff, since that's commie-style erasure and does nothing but ignore our country's history. That said, it's absolutely wild to me that people like Robert Gould Shaw are ignored while Braxton Bragg got a military base named after him.
The government could say they're making a Fort Shaw and putting it next to Fort Bragg tomorrow, I wouldn't care. This is the same country that loves to name military equipment after American Indian tribes that soldiers often had to fight to subdue so why is naming something after a Confederate military leader such a problem?

Bragg in particular wasn't the best commander during the Civil War sure but we should all know now or at least realize that this is bigger then just one mediocre general. This is a fight over legacy and how a group of people as a whole should be depicted by society. The Confederates of the 1860s are right now on body blocking duty for the Patriots of the 1770s. As for why this is the case, anyone who knows their American history has the answer to that question.
 
Last edited:
Confederate worship by conservatives is fucking stupid.
I agree, but I think its partially misunderstood. People conflate resisting cultural erasure with glorifying confederates; the left further pushes the narrative because they can paint their opponents as bigots. Braxton Bragg sucked as a general but its more about stopping rewriting history because you don't like said person or said event they took part in. Ill take a base being named after a mediocre general thats held the name for over 100 years versus something gay like the USS Harvey Milk, or Fort George Floyd.

Yes, there are people who worship the confederate in the south but those people are retards and few and far between.
 
If "race relations" are contingent upon granting minority groups overreaching political authority and exaggerated political impact in a nation or else they'll chimp out, race relations are already in the gutter and shouldn't be a deciding factor.
Everyone is too scared to pull off the band-aid and hopes they can shuffle the problem away for the next admin.

Me, if I were president? "LOL FUCK YOU NIGGERS AND FUCK YOU JEETS! ALL JEETS, BEGONE! ALL BENEFITS FOR NIGGERS? GONE!" and watch as the politicians pretend to act outraged, secretly know I am the greatest American hero to ever have lived.
 
The correct term for the struggle of socialists would be materialism, making humans materially equal; idealism would be your policy preference around God. Sorry if my autism around correct utilization of language triggers somebody, but manipulation of perceived reality starts with language and re-assigning meanings diametrically opposed to the original meaning of terms, the preferred technique of Neo-Marxists
You're fine. You're right though, the focus on the material by Marxists is not only a nation-killer, it's spiritually corrupt. The picture below represents the five senses, they are to be rebelled against to be closer to God. Their ideology is a direct contradiction of everything holy.
 

Attachments

  • 6b029971dc8a981643325cf4f7fdb574.jpg
    6b029971dc8a981643325cf4f7fdb574.jpg
    108 KB · Views: 87
I am confused why people keep saying "the Dems are fucked". They continue to win elections and reap the spoils of the disease they have infested us with due to mass migration.

The ballot and mail in vote machines they built and created in 2020 that served them well then and in 2022 and was even capable of giving someone like Kamala Harris a vote share still seem fully operational.

Trump isnt on the ballot and a bunch of uninspiring Rinos who lecture young whites on how bad and racist they are for calling out the Jew, not wanting to get stabbed by Niggers, not wanting infinite legal immigration, and wanting houses so they can have a future instead of the boomer going on a cruise. Rinos who love to put up token minorities who will do nothing for them or women who cant lead.

Who see that the Republicans will gleefully backstab them while the Dems have their peoples back as long as they are a chosen minority.

Yes people dont like Democrats. Democrats have a machine that gets votes no matter what and the Republican party is pretty fucking uninspiring on the races for these smaller seats. Its not a bad bet the ballot harvest machine beats token based minority that the Rs will put up for some of the purple seats.
 
AOC is retarded, but it's true that there are companies that don't care about killing or maiming Americans, destroying the environment, and ruining our country's natural bounties for quick profits. I was reading Clarence Thomas's autobiographical memoirs (My Grandfather's Son—it's a great read or listen because he's literally the stereotype of an extremely poor black guy without a father from the deep south that libshits pander to voters about) and he spent time at Monsanto in the legal department somewhat early in his career. He came across company information about certain chemicals they were producing that were then exposed to workers, especially poor workers in black communities like Savannah where he spent a lot of his formative childhood years. Those chemicals, he realized, were associated with very specific medical conditions like strokes that permanently immobilized half your body. And he connected that to a neighbor who worked in a factory using such chemicals that one day had something like a stroke and could never move the right half of his body again. The black guy could only sit on his porch and use his one working arm to swat at flies for the rest of his life. When Clarence Thomas raised this issue to Monsanto—both on moral and legal grounds, because of the future liabilities from marketing these chemicals—he was dismissed.

The modern American conservative political tradition, with its roots going back at least to people like Teddy Roosevelt, should care a lot about America's environment. Not in the neoliberal or progressive manner of carbon taxes and offshoring industry to Asia, but in the sense that we have a moral and national obligation to preserve the beauty and economic bounties of America. Things like fishing regulations engendered by the Magnuson-Stevens Act have two purposes: ensure that there are fish stocks for the future so that fishermen can have sustainable careers in perpetuity, and prevent foreign fishing fleets from coming into our waters and killing all our fish. Trump picked up on this somewhat in his first term by signing the Great American Outdoors Act, but future conservatives should emphasize protecting our own natural resources so that we—not foreigners or faceless corporations—can enjoy them in all aspects. That means clean water, not peddling chemicals that kill or disable the American working class, clean air, bountiful wild animal stocks, stopping littering, etc. Some parts of the Republican party care more about this than others—the Florida GOP, for example, has always cared more about environmentalism than other parts of the country because fishing and environmental tourism are huge parts of the state economy. But that also includes things with little economic benefit like supporting projects to expand the range of the Florida panther.

One of the worst parts of mass immigration that is most easily observable and disgusting is how third worlders and their city bugmen confederates litter and dump their waste wherever is easiest. It's not only disgusting, but it literally sickens our people and natural resources. It's such an easy layup to say "We are true environmentalists. We don't want your products to be made more expensive by inscrutable carbon taxes that go into untraceable slush funds. We just want you to be able to take your kids to safely swim in the lake, fish for clean fish in the rivers, and enjoy pristine landscapes free from trash." It's an extremely salient issue for young people. But, like with most other policies, the GOP will have to be dragged by their betters to that position, because politicians like Lindsay Graham don't give a shit if you can't take your kid to your childhood swimming hole because a multinational corporation led by soulless Indians dumped dangerous waste products into it to save a thousand dollars.
 
TDR was a progressive "conservative" - My notion of calling him the first socialist potus might be too hyperbolic but this wall of gpt text from a progressive contextualized instant. Haram
yeah Teddy is his own thing not really attached to what his label traditionally is, not unlike Trump
 
yeah Teddy is his own thing not really attached to what his label traditionally is, not unlike Trump
You can say he is part of the tradition of northern progressivism with the closest analogue being some of the more right leaning social democrats in Europe. as compared to the progressivism of Wilson which is much more technocratic, authoritarian etc, more economically liberal

Modern American progressivism is essentially a fusion of Wilsonian and rooseveltian progressivism + new leftism + neoliberal economics

I think rooseveltian progressivism is sympathetic but Wilsonian is proto globohomo. It’s a bit reductive but that’s how I feel
 
The modern American conservative political tradition, with its roots going back at least to people like Teddy Roosevelt, should care a lot about America's environment. Not in the neoliberal or progressive manner of carbon taxes and offshoring industry to Asia, but in the sense that we have a moral and national obligation to preserve the beauty and economic bounties of America
For better and for worse, the Republican Party has always had a relationship with pro-business interests (though exactly how has varied over time). While Roosevelt is obvious a standout individual, remember that he was never meant to become President in the first place and potentially wouldn't been had McKinley never been assassinated. His views on regulation and such greatly clash with other Republican presidents like Calvin Coolidge and Ronald Reagan.

Here is a quote from a letter Theodore Roosevelt sent to The Jungle writer and socialist, Upton Sinclair, when he was in office:
There are doubtless communities where such self-raising is very hard for the time being; there are unquestionably men who are crippled by accident (as by being old and having large families dependent on them); there are many, many men who lack any intelligence or character and who therefore cannot thus raise themselves. But while I agree with you that energetic, and, as I believe, in the long run radical, action must be taken to do away with the effects of arrogant and selfish greed on the part of the capitalist, yet I am more than ever convinced that the real factor in the elevation of any man or any mass of men must be the development within his or their hearts and heads of the qualities which alone can make either the individual, the class or the nation permanently useful to themselves and to others.
 
Last edited:
yeah Teddy is his own thing not really attached to what his label traditionally is, not unlike Trump
Its politics historically an interesting comparison - TDR was a New Liberal that used the assassination of McKinley to introduce socialist policies through the GOPs platform while Trump is a classic business progressive that used the Democrats going full retard into International Socialism under Chieftain Obongo through the GOP platform to steer the country away from socialist policies.
Somebody should write a comparative paper on the subject
 
Back
Top Bottom