💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 155 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 276 40.2%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 92 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 163 23.8%

  • Total voters
    686
BeDabblin LIVE w/El Horrible ep131
  • Rekieta calls in to the show out of nowhere, wishes to talk about the Stuttering John case and Aaron Imholte's case.
  • Some discussion about Stuttering John (no one cares)
  • Proceeds to Aaron's criminal case, calls Aaron dumb and clarifies about the judge having discretion over the plea, an agreement is not set in stone.
  • "The jail time is based on the crime, but the fact he's getting one is entirely based on he's retarded" (I will concede this is true).
  • States that the second alleged violation, despite not being considered by the court in sentencing, is still in play when it comes to Aaron's probation officer, saying that Aaron's lawyer should've proceeded to a hearing to vacate it anyway.
  • Indicates that "if" Kayla got a HRO against Aaron, "maybe in the next month or so", he'll automatically a order than is between 2 - 5 years, up to potentially 50 years because of Aaron's past HRO violations both in Kayla's and his ex-wife's cases.
  • Further criticises Aaron for not getting an Alford plea. "if" she decides to sue him, she "wins" automatically.
  • The mask guy addresses the elephant in the room, asking Rekieta directly if Kayla is planning to sue him. "At this point, she doesn't know." (bullshit)
  • Nick continues bullshitting how Kayla was super-mega-uber raped by Aaron emotionally and he insists he had nothing to do with filing charges against Aaron.
  • Nick begins debating damages, suggesting that "10,000 people a day calling you a whore, I don't know the cost of reputational repair" [We called her a whore before Aaron, Nick]
  • Conversation somehow veers into BossmanJack, Nick jokes he knows about committing drug crimes on camera [I thought it was drywall, Nick?]
  • Nick pretends to be a legal expert about probation violations (he's not licenced).
  • The conversation starts to wrap up, with Nick insisting that if Aaron went to trial, all the elements to convince a jury was there. Because Geno and Kiki described the photo online, their presence wouldn't have been needed.

  • Some panellist called "OJ" with a ghost vtuber avatar is confronted by Nick, asking why he doesn't like him [this is really fucking insecure]
  • He replies "I'm not a fan of dudes that stand around in bathrooms naked with other dudes doing coke".
  • Rekieta tries to jokingly blow this off, asking "why are you so angry?"
  • OJ replies "I'm not angry, I just don't like you, your a fruit"
  • Rekieta, with increasing confusion at the idea of a Dabbler not kissing his ass "...I'm not a fruit! I'm retarded."
  • The host mask guy queries about if Nick and Aaron fucked in the same room, Nick with some clear frustration in his voice that "something close to that happened, Aaron already told this stuff, I don't want to rehash it all, I want to move on with my life. It was a period of time that was really wild with a bunch of really bad decisions".
  • Mask guy quickly shoves Nick off the call.
 
Last edited:
He's so hard to listen to, how did people (myself included) ever stand listening to this complete faggot? Or his WHORE wife?
What the fuck is this shit?
View attachment 8024621
What, the Ghost, or the Potato, or Rocco in the Gimp masked, weirdly without his hand up another's tuckus? I mean, this is a serious legal show! (But totally not a lawyer, in spite of his channel name...)
 
BeDabblin LIVE w/El Horrible ep131
  • Nick begins debating damages, suggesting that "10,000 people a day calling you a whore, I don't know the cost of reputational repair" [we called her a whore before Aaron, Nick]
Nick, and Kayla herself, are responsible for Kayla's supposed reputational woes. I can't think of a thing Aaron has shared about her that has lowered my estimation of her. I can think of a million things she and her husband have done that have.
 
Locals update:
IMG_7992.jpeg
 

Why is he still obsessed with Kurt?


LOCALS response in chat:

Nick is not streaming because of the HRO and bodycam case. He does not commit to streaming until afterwards, then he has A LOT of stuff planned.



1760203398656.png 1760203434750.png 1760203473968.png 1760203542712.png 1760203582191.png 1760204251536.png 1760204272579.png 1760204297619.png 1760204362476.png 1760204390823.png 1760204430448.png

EDIT:

He STILL spins 'I was not a trsut fund kid' instead of 'I got a lot of finaical help later in life' that is more accurate...

Also, drugs are still 'cool'.

And there is a rape joke, because of COURSE....
 
Last edited:
Nick begins debating damages, suggesting that "10,000 people a day calling you a whore, I don't know the cost of reputational repair"
Nick, the world has been calling your slatternly, easy, jezebel wife a Whore of Babylon LONG before Aaron was in the picture.
The most your wife might get from Aaron's Kino Casino interview is...another 50 dollars?
 

Attachments

  • 1730569402978.png
    1730569402978.png
    101.3 KB · Views: 203
  • 1709183897344.png
    1709183897344.png
    919.5 KB · Views: 183
  • 1709182873076.png
    1709182873076.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 210
  • 1708835597193.png
    1708835597193.png
    180.5 KB · Views: 195
Why is he still obsessed with Kurt?
Nick thought of himself as superior in every way to Kurt and that Kurt could be manipulated forever. It makes him seethe to this day that Kurt flipped on him because the warrant was airtight. The fact Kurt gets to continue having a positive reputation while Nick's is trashed just because he did a little coke with his daughter is a grave injustice to Nick.

Plus, Kurt's an easy target because he's fat (Nick's eating disorder makes him hate certain fat people, but not literally every dabbler), awkward, and a bad cook.
 
Last edited:
1760204702206.png
A 1995 Ford Escort Sedan had an MSRP of $12,390
Let’s assume Celeste’s picture-perfect cheerleader nepo baby bought it brand new, because, realistically, he would’ve thrown a tantrum if it wasn’t.
The cumulative rate of inflation from 1995 to 2025 is 112.6%, putting that car at about $26,339 in today’s money.

Not exactly in the price range of your everyday whitebread nigger kid's ride.
Most working-class teens back then were scraping together change for a used, rusted-out ’85 Honda Accord from the forecourt of Danny DeVito in Matilda so they could deliver pizzas, not strolling into dad’s bank to slack off.
 
Last edited:
Nick, the world has been calling your slatternly, easy, jezebel wife a Whore of Babylon LONG before Aaron was in the picture.
The most your wife might get from Aaron's Kino Casino interview is...another 50 dollars?
Here's a Godwinson (yeah I know) archive from November of 2022.
And here's another copy:
1760207969198.png
AI Summary of the Rekieta bit:
Godwinson’s Slatternly stream is essentially a character assassination performance of Nick Rekieta and his wife, filtered through the YouTube “kino dogma” ethos — a mix of mock-documentary, ironic sermonizing, and shock humor. The tone is theatrical and deliberately overblown, with musical cues, fake applause, and repeated “advert breaks” functioning like ironic punctuation.

🩸 Part I – “The Wife Responds”​

  • Godwinson opens the “news alert” by saying “Coxotto’s wife has responded” (a play on Rekieta’s name). He claims her public statement defending their marriage proves the opposite — that they’re exhibitionists.
  • He reads her post live, pausing after nearly every sentence to mock and “interpret” it:
    • When she says she “likes having fun” and “enjoys the beauty of the human body,” he spins it as veiled confession of promiscuity.
    • When she says “Nick is my only partner,” he repeats it over ironic music, saying the subtext is “we don’t f*** around — but I sure do.”
  • He keeps using “reading between the lines” as justification for his extrapolations — portraying her as an “unhinged exhibitionist,” and Rekieta as a humiliated husband too passive to control her.
💀 Part II – “The Massage Story”

This is the longest and most vitriolic section — roughly 20 minutes of play-by-play analysis of an old clip where Rekieta’s wife recounts a creepy massage encounter live on stream.
Godwinson replays it as though it’s courtroom evidence of cuckoldry:
  • She describes getting a massage from a male therapist who overstepped boundaries.
  • Instead of treating it as a story about unwanted touching, Godwinson reframes it as an admission of infidelity — emphasizing her tone (“she’s smiling,” “no shame”) and Rekieta’s reaction (“he’s not angry — he’s sipping his drink”).
  • He repeatedly zooms in on her phrasing — “he massaged me and stuff,” “I went back a few more times” — and calls her “slatternly,” “a woman of ill repute.”
  • The phrase “cope goblet” becomes a motif — every time Rekieta takes a drink, Godwinson plays applause and music, saying “he sips from the cuck goblet.”
  • When she says they were trying to get pregnant at the time, he dramatically pauses and says “He’s just realized one of the kids isn’t his.”

This section becomes a grotesque parody of analysis streams — blending tabloid tone, sermon-like rhythm, and ironic applause to turn a mundane anecdote into “proof” of moral collapse.

⚖️ Part III – “The Slatternly Woman Doctrine”​

Godwinson then plays an old Coach Red Pill (Gonzalo Lira) monologue defining “slatternly women” — women who dress provocatively and seek validation through sexual attention.
  • He inserts images of Rekieta’s wife over the definitions and repeats “dirty, untidy, especially used about women,” treating it as biblical scripture.
  • He positions Lira as a prophet: “Had Rekieta listened to Coach, he would have known his fate.”
  • He weaves it into his Kino Dogma 2007 motif — implying that YouTube once had prophets and moralists (Coach Red Pill, WarCorpse, DemoniusX), and now it’s full of moral degeneracy (Rekieta’s crowd).

🕯️ Part IV – “Kino Dogma 2007” as a Lens​

Throughout, Godwinson frames his content as Kino Dogma 2007 — his tongue-in-cheek artistic manifesto.
It’s both a meme and a method:
  • Kino (cinema/artistic authenticity) + Dogma 2007 (a parody of the Danish Dogme 95 film rules) represents “raw, unfiltered, low-fi YouTube truth.”
  • He praises creators who embody it (DemoniusX, old WarCorps atheists, early Coach Red Pill) as “Antediluvian Kings” — raw, unrefined, unsanitized truth-tellers.
  • He contrasts them with modern creators like Rekieta, whom he paints as grifters hiding degeneracy under professionalism.
  • So the Rekieta segments are not just gossip — they’re part of a “moral parable” in Godwinson’s cosmology:

    “The Kino Dogma 2007 creator is ugly, honest, deranged, but pure.
    Rekieta pretends to be clean, polished, based — but is spiritually filthy.”

🧱 Structure & Symbolism​

  • Every time Godwinson plays “applause” or “foreign [music],” it’s used as mock liturgy, like a church service celebrating humiliation.
  • He calls Rekieta’s wife “slatternly” in the biblical sense — “unclean woman” — and Rekieta “the face of a cuckold.”
  • He calls their marriage “a house of the rising sun” — implying their children are born into moral ruin.
  • The stream’s name “Slatternly” becomes symbolic shorthand for everything Godwinson sees as corrupt in the “American e-celeb Christian tradcath lawyer” persona Rekieta markets.

🎭 Summary Takeaway​

Godwinson’s thesis:

Nick Rekieta presents himself as a moral, family-values lawyer but tolerates a wife who publicly sexualizes herself and humiliates him, exposing the hypocrisy of the “based” influencer class.

He weaponizes absurd humor, grotesque imagery, and exaggerated theater to make that point — aligning himself with the Kino Dogma 2007 movement of “ugly but real creators,” versus the polished hypocrisy of modern YouTube.
It's too bad no one sent the Toe a copy of this vid before that fateful Mayr(-less) Comedy Show.
 
Last edited:
He's so hard to listen to, how did people (myself included) ever stand listening to this complete faggot?

He adds absolutely nothing new but there's one watchable part:




You just know you're down bad when even the talking orange guy is calling you a fruit.
 
Of course Nick has never heard of JD Delay, that would take YouTube searches that involve keywords like "remorse", "guilt" and "addiction".
JD is a career criminal who successfully monetized post-incarceration woes, with honest, relatable commentary on actually feeling bad for the crimes you commit.
A rather alien concept to the "What drug test?" Nicholas Rekieta.
1760207562621.png
With his 1.61m subscriber count, 1,333 subs a day increase and massive engagement, RekietaLaw simply can't compete with the (3.8x) bigger channel.
See Nick, you can make a career out of crime, you just suck at it.
 
Last edited:
Nick, the world has been calling your slatternly, easy, jezebel wife a Whore of Babylon LONG before Aaron was in the picture.
The most your wife might get from Aaron's Kino Casino interview is...another 50 dollars?
I hope to God he tries though because he stands absolutely nothing to gain from this other than making Aaron's wallet suffah. But Aaron would be a fool not to pay to have our slatternly wife's whoredom be brought before the court. :story:
 
The host mask guy queries about if Nick and Aaron fucked in the same room, Nick with some clear frustration in his voice that "something close to that happened, Aaron already told this stuff,
10,000 people a day calling you a whore, I don't know the cost of reputational repair
So was it defamation or not?
Nick has repeatedly said that Aaron was lying when telling those stories, but now that he is confronted he just backs down??
 
So was it defamation or not?
Nick has repeatedly said that Aaron was lying when telling those stories, but now that he is confronted he just backs down??
This is why the defamation lawsuit of Nick and his company is not going to happen.
RekietaMedia LLC cannot produce enough evidence that Aaron's claims are knowingly and maliciously false.
His opinions are based on events that occurred in private, with witnessed that can be easily torn down as biased.
Anti-SLAPP is in effect in Minnesota now as well.
Nick knows this, and is why he's vague on the subject, keeping the flicker alive to amuse Dabbletards.
 
Back
Top Bottom