There's a funny old image on ED of a neckbeard wearing a shirt of Reagan and showing off his Doom collection. Sadly, the website seems to be down right now, I'm not sure for how long.
Why is anyone taking the Libertarian Party seriously?
It's an oxymoron, it has no reason to exist
It's like a pacifist serial killer
Either way, libertarianism is an ethical/legal position, and so far nobody has made any coherent refutation, yet even a rebuttal or retort that's coherent and stands up to scrutiny
I'm not sure using the PARTY of libertarianism is a good start. The party has long since been made a giant joke, and my conspiracy - mind says it's because they can't have anyone who disrupts the balance of left vs. right.
I'm not sure using the PARTY of libertarianism is a good start. The party has long since been made a giant joke, and my conspiracy - mind says it's because they can't have anyone who disrupts the balance of left vs. right.
The only way any of these systems will work, be it free market libertarianism or socialism, is for a state to have a shared ethos through both racial and cultural means. That is the only way ANY set of ideas can work in practice. This is an objective fact of reality.
Even full blown Communism would work. Would it be the best system? Probably not, but it would still function as to the benefit of people in relationship to governance.
The modern concept of "politics" existing in a vaccum as "ideas" independent of a people is something relegated to only the past century. Nationalism was the default operating system for all of human history.
The erosion of this fundamental truth is why every Western country has turned into a niggercattle feedlot and only benefits the top 1%.
It's rare for trump to be the smartest in the room, but he's right. With no boarders the entire population of the turd-world would just some to a America and with-in a few decades once they are the ethnic majority they will vote for the same shitty culture that made their country a shithole in the first place. I have no idea how libertarians expect to counter that. People are selfish and the majority of whites not seeing race is the exception. People will vote for what's best for their own people even if it infringes on the rights of others.
Libertarians will always lose if they keep this up. No-one want's to live in a society where teen drug addicts can drive around in cars wielding a AKs with no restrictions. People vote what will keep them safe, even if it means less rights, how do you think most dictators get into power.
I'm not sure exactly what you are getting at. So because Rand says something about this specific situation, it means libertarianism is incorrect? I disagree mind you, but I don't think I quite get what you are saying.
I'm not sure exactly what you are getting at. So because Rand says something about this specific situation, it means libertarianism is incorrect? I disagree mind you, but I don't think I quite get what you are saying.
this is a thread for posting examples of lolbertarians saying insane and dumb shit and making fun of them for being retards. it's not a thread dedicated to destroying the philosophy of libertarianism.
unfortunately, as long as there are teenagers and autistic pot heads there will always be libertarians.
How does that end up working at a nation level? At that point countries would stop existing and it'd be just millions of tiny tribal nations. In the long run you are just going to end up countries again once people start forming pacts and then taking over other peoples land. The more I look at this belief system I start thinking it's just an idealized romanticization of the wild-west.
