Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Judge Holden said:
As an aside from my grumbling, for any nigger who has not yet been cursed with the experience here is a taste as to how widespread and embarrassing the anti-rowling screech campaign got in its heyday
https://youtube.com/watch?v=RodZkJlYEso
Click to expand...
The best part is you know whoever wrote that cutaway probably doesn't even care about Rowling or trannies. They just needed something topical to pad the episode length and knew Rowling being a TERF was newsworthy at the time.
 
joebobmurphy said:
While watching Watson get slapped around is great fun I feel that I should remind you that Rowling is still one of those “hell yeah, more migrants! I’ll never be within 300 yards of one or have to compete with them for work, but hell yeah. I feel strongly about an issue I have no stake in!” types. Just because you don’t suck girl dick doesn’t mean you’re not a faggot.
Click to expand...
Fake News Anchor said:
YASS QWEEN! SLAAAAAAAAY!
J.K. Rowling is doing so much to protect the rights of British women - like advocating for mass immigration of blacks and arabs who rape and murder them, and calling women who criticize this racists. But hey, at least she wants to keep British women fresh for O'munduango Afari to rape without worrying about if their getting a tranny's leftovers.
View attachment 7976444
Click to expand...
She's said essentially nothing about immigration for the past year. Her most recent posts were of the same calibre as those she was making about transgenders, right before her open letter got her cancelled, while most of her public stance on things like islam is profoundly negative. Whether she supports or opposes mass immigration, she's staying quiet about it and remaining focused on defeating the troon menace.
 
W@rui said:
To be fair to her, Emma Watson talked about her recently (last week I believe); so JKR had every right to respond.

5jB5yP08LDFTrtda.mp4
Click to expand...
I meant her in general maulding about the former HP cast not sharing her views about trans people while she actively tries to produce a inferior adaptation with the streaming series that already broke one of her requests with the original movies with the casting of Americans.
 
ManInTheBlarms said:
Do the actors go out of their way to talk about her? The first statements were sort of a big response to Rowling being a constant source of controversy from then on and I'm pretty sure they just reply when interviewers ask nowadays.

Tell me, if Rowling had instead dedicated the last 5 years to causing a violent white genocide, what response would you want from the actors? Should they just be quiet when asked and grateful that they got to be movie stars?
Click to expand...
Wanting men to stay out of women's bathrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms, rape centers, shelters, sports, prisons, and not wanting kids to be put on puberty blockers or given surgeries isn't a fucking genocide faggot so your comparison is invalid.

As for the actors a simple no comment or I disagree with her and end it there would have been fine instead of backstabbing the woman they owed their careers to by calling her a bigot.
 
Telvanni said:
I still laugh at the fact that Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) and Bellatrix Lestrange (Helena Carter) are one of the few who openly went up to bat for Rowling which is based chuddery.

Not to forget Malfoy (Tom Felton) defending her too which is extremely in character lmao
Also Robbie Coltrane RIP to a homie
Click to expand...
Still fits with how people who play villains in films tend to be the nicest people in real life.
 
teriyakiburns said:
A sampling of the latest replies. Seems weaker than usual.

View attachment 7976422
View attachment 7976426
View attachment 7976427

Thread tourists are the worst.
Click to expand...
That last one is hilariously ironic. "Unoriginal Hollywood had to use your writing to make something successful, so you should be grateful."

I agree with the other posts though. She's a writer that never felt the need to actually defend the original vision of her works, and at times entertained the "woke" ideology (remember the black Hermoine shit). Now it's comes back to bite her in the ass because she cultivated a fanbase of crazies who worship "progress" above all else. I can respect her calling out the people who tried to sully her name, she's not blameless in the reception that she garnered. She's still a hardcore liberal that disagrees with a very specific topic.
 
LaughJoke2.0 said:
Wanting men to stay out of women's bathrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms, rape centers, shelters, sports, prisons, and not wanting kids to be put on puberty blockers or given surgeries isn't a fucking genocide faggot so your comparison is invalid.

As for the actors a simple no comment or I disagree with her and end it there would have been fine instead of backstabbing the woman they owed their careers to by calling her a bigot.
Click to expand...
Why should they cuck their own opinions when she pitches a fit about this topic as loudly as she can every day of her life? Rowling did not kowtow in infinite gratitude to her queer fanbase when they asked her to please maybe talk to someone outside mumsnet, she just made fun of them. I think Watson and Radcliffe could be an awful lot more harsh.
 
Miriam Margoyles said:
No it doesn't, you autist.
The expression is 'change of tack'. There is no such expression as 'change of tact' - if you're saying 'change of tact', you're saying it wrong.

Christ, mistakes like this must be a diamond dozen where you come from.
Click to expand...
I would have thought change of track was the common choice if anything
 
If you'll forgive the thread tourist post, I think Rowling being a typical woke shitlib in every respect other than the tranny question is actually better than if she was entirely based and redpilled. It really brings to light just how insanely devoted these people are to tranny ideology and how they will throw even their strongest, most influential supporters under the bus, even someone who made the beloved childhood books and movies that they wrap their entire personality around in some cases, and hate them forever because they disagree on this one topic.
 
The Polaroid Man said:
For the life of me I never understood why she had to turn to being Weinstein’s little fleshlight.

It’s not like she’s some ditzy naive farm girl from Nebraska. Her dad has been a powerful lawyer since the turn of the century. Born with a silver spoon in her mouth, a package of 70 million GBP from HP before inflation, she could've parlayed that and her dad's influence into any role she ever dreamed of. What a cheap-ass cunt.
Click to expand...
Look, I agree that Rowling has no obligation to forgive Watson, but can we not refer to a former child actress as "Weinstein's little fleshlight?"
 
Telemeter said:
Out of all of the cast he's the one who would have benefited the most from using his Harry Potter money to buy a farm or a pub or something cause he's so short.
Click to expand...
Speaking of, whatever happened to Rupert Grint? Of the three Main Potter Leads, he's the one who practically dropped doff the map in comparison.

Outside of him deciding to buy an ice cream truck with his Potter money, I don't remember hearing him saying anything about Rowling in either way, or if he has its been long ago that I can't find mention of it...
 
Leaf Wage Slave Jr said:
Speaking of, whatever happened to Rupert Grint? Of the three Main Potter Leads, he's the one who practically dropped doff the map in comparison.

Outside of him deciding to buy an ice cream truck with his Potter money, I don't remember hearing him saying anything about Rowling in either way, or if he has its been long ago that I can't find mention of it...
Click to expand...
He wasn't as vocal as the other two, he's probably the best actor of the 3, but he's ginger and not the hot kind of ginger so his career wasn't going anywhere. No one wanted to see him fuck a horse :(
 
I am firmly, decidedly against the trans dumpster fire that has plagued our country, but we all need to be honest about one thing:
The feminist + race rhetoric from somewhere around the 90's and onward is undeniably a huge component the trans movement. Rowling herself has been complicit in promoting it, leading to the very thing she's been fighting now for years.

If we want to see every degenerate plague crushed in our society in our lifetime, we need to be absolutely clear on how it all came about. I pray to God that people like Rowling will admit to their mistakes and speak on the issue of progressivism as a whole so we can stop putting band-aids on the pustules of the much deeper disease.
 
PSA for thread tourists:

If you're here to say "I hate JKR because she hates men/is woke/wrote some stuff I disagreed with once/didn't say something I think she should have said about [insert political topic]" please just type it out in your notes application or word processor of choice, screenshot it, and DM it to one of our regular thread posters like @teriyakiburns so he can make a compilation of KF-sponsored RDS posts instead of shitting up the thread with a dozen identical posts that all purport to be saying something original.
 
MrTroll said:
The real problem is how lame and un-entertaining her beef game is. Hit Em Up is how you beef. Not this gay "I've known you since you were 10 but I'll never forgive you for that handwritten note" shit. Even Elon beefs better than JK.
Click to expand...
She's got millions of dollars and is getting another attempt at doing harry Potter live action and instead of doing that she wants her former child stars to kiss the ring because she cant shut the fuck up with her gender views.

If anything she desperately needs to log off and stop taking the Internet seriously
 
ManInTheBlarms said:
Why should they cuck their own opinions when she pitches a fit about this topic as loudly as she can every day of her life? Rowling did not kowtow in infinite gratitude to her queer fanbase when they asked her to please maybe talk to someone outside mumsnet, she just made fun of them. I think Watson and Radcliffe could be an awful lot more harsh.
Click to expand...
She didn't kowtow to the queers when she retroactively made Dumbledore and Grindelwald faggots? Also, a lot of Dykes and Fags have issues with the trannies too you know with troons dictating to Gays and Lesbians their own sexuality with what makes a man and woman and "Genital Preference". You think they're not harsh enough I don't think she's harsh enough troons are a parasite on society and maybe we should make honest people out of them and really give them a genocide.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom