🦊 Furry Adam Johnston / YourMovieSucks / YourMovieSucksDOTorg / AnUnkindness - It's hip to fuck dogs.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Laburnum said:
Some other no name dramatuber is trying to cash in on the action:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=KbGNFtWm03M
Click to expand...
still wild
that some of his defenders immediately use the "homophobic attacks" and "homophobia" defence.
...

and reminding everyone why these fucktards will legitimately be the reason why LGBT rights be removed
since they are categorizing criticism against bestiality as homophobic.
 
Disastrously Dumb said:
and reminding everyone why these fucktards will legitimately be the reason why LGBT rights be removed
since they are categorizing criticism against bestiality as homophobic.
Click to expand...
I mean, it's the natural progression as soon as Trannies were accepted into it. When you go from L (sexuality) G (sexuality) B (sexuality) to T (they specifically say not sexuality) then Q (means nothing) I (not sexuality) etc. it then reasonably (not that "reasonability" ever mattered to them...) have to extend it to anything. Furries have become accepted (not a sexuality) so how can you say no to dogfucking/kidfucking (two "legitimate" sexualities)? They managed to attach "furry" to "gay", and dogfucking (which is wrong, except you shouldn't judge people anyway because that's phobic, so maybe it's right) to furry. And if you accept one "wrong" thing (because biggot otherwise) then the line is gone. So even if the act of dogfucking is wrong it's equivalent to shaming a gay man for being gay, which is basically genociding them.

As usual Troons are the reason for turning something into a degenerate cesspool and ruining it for the actual people said thing was for.
 
Last edited:
Namekian George Floyd said:
Josh has never talked shit about someone then hid from them immediately after unlike the giant walking vagina who is Rob's Media.
Click to expand...
Nigger, you're like, retarded. Even Josh admits that talking to Adam is a huge waste of time and that he only does it because he likes Adam's reviews.

Starman John said:
New Nicholas Deoreo video
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Vg-THx8zj9Q
Click to expand...

I like how Adam's only counter argument against non cc Youtubers is "they give me a fair chance and are not rude to me".

Like, he has to know that Tom and Oreo are huge faggots who will suck up to him just because he has millions of subscribers.
 
Christ.
1758676059497.webp

2:10

Respectfully, you can't keep pretending Rob was never making these accusations when you admit out loud that this was the premise of his video. He even says Null "should have called him a dog f*** and moved on". You cannot pretend as though his video was "just asking questions" and "just showing things I said" when you are admitting out loud to understanding that the premise of his video is to accuse me of being a z****ile.

At 25:24 you have now added in context that you were not aware of until watching my response video after your first stream. The fact that you included it here shows that you agree this is necessary context that should have been included in Rob's video. Why is nobody holding Rob to that standard?

Why is it okay for Rob to to make an entire edited propaganda video against me, but my response calling him out in the comments section is what crossed the line? That's literally the only place I used the word "g****er". In the comments section on his own video.

The entire point of using that language and saying "sending p*** to m****s" is to illustrate how removing context and details from accusations can be harmful; Something that Rob does intentionally throughout his entire video.

The only difference between what Rob and I did is that I left the full context with details in the exact same place as I made those remarks. The full context is within that very comment thread. Even on twitter, the full context is what the quote tweet is responding to. Rob's video intentionally withholds context, because he knows that the full context doesn’t paint me as an abuser.

I didn't make an edited propaganda video about him despite knowing exactly how I could do it to make my point even clearer. I didn’t tag him on twitter. I didn't even mention his username or show identifying information in my screenshots. It is absolutely ridiculous that I'm being treated as the aggressor in this situation when all I've done is shine a mirror on Rob that reflects 10% of what he does on a daily basis.

I still do sincerely believe he crossed a line by showing the username of a page that includes sexually explicit material of myself, especially on an all-ages video. Again, not just the username, but descriptions of images along with a call for his audience to go there if they want to see them. There’s so many factors here that make this uniquely unethical. What exactly about his criticism makes it necessary to direct traffic from his audience to this page?

I still don't have an answer for this. Why was it important for him to keep the username along with descriptions of sex acts and a call to direct his audience to the page if they want to see it? These aren't cartoons. These are real people. Why was it important for him to direct traffic to the page? What about his video would have been different with a blurred username? Clearly you understand this if you are blurring it yourself. The points and premise of your video are no different because of it.

I don’t believe you're a bad person. I think we just disagree on what lines were crossed and who crossed them first. I think there’s a part of you knows that Rob's video was made irresponsibly; Otherwise your video would not have corrected the same mistakes he made.

The commentary community would be a better place if it held their own to the same standards it holds others. Rob is worthy of criticism for his video regardless of how poorly you think I responded. This will be my last big comment for a while, since I'm getting my 2nd PRP injection today.

Thanks.

Adam.
If you post videos of you getting fucked in the ass.
Prepare for some reviews lmao
 
Mizafuginmike said:
To be honest, I almost understand the dog lust more than the cartoon dog lust. At least it's a flesh and blood creature one could theoretically interact with. I'm more baffled by these people (all 100% autistic, I'm guessing?) who are sincerely sexually attracted to cartoons. I could maybe see finding a highly realistic illustration slightly sexy, reminding you of a real person, but these super simplistic Disney line drawings?

I used to always think when I'd see Rule 34 of Family Guy or Simpsons characters or whatever it was just a childish joke. "Ha ha What would it look like if Daria got gangbanged by Huey, Dewey, and Louie?" But now I see all these people commissioning cartoon porn on Bluesky from illustrators making livings on Patreon because people are hardcore jerking off to this stuff? And I'd try to tell myself that I'm making an assumption, I don't actually know for certain that anyone is gooning to Saturday morning cartoons... but I just watched Adam spell out his actual sexual lust for Simba in disturbing detail.

How is that possible? Have some people always been like that, or has the internet somehow cultivated a whole new type of impossible sexuality?
Click to expand...
Everyone's capable of it. You're better off not understanding. As with furries, it's usually something you get into when you're young.

"Ironic" jokes (actually post-ironic excuses to focus attention on the subject) are one of the bigger grooming vectors in recent decades.

Rustybuttons said:
When did he get so past all the online speak that hundreds of thousands of people knowing he likes horse cock is just another Tuesday?
Click to expand...
He probably just sees himself as more honest than the pseudo-moralizing closet nihilists he sees around him.

A lot of people hold onto social mores without believing in anything that used to undergird them, and it makes it hard to take them seriously. A lot of boomers and older Xers are like this.

Adum probably over-generalizes that, or just genuinely never met anyone whose way of life convicted him (Adum) in spirit. That'd be anyone who authentically lives as though there's more to life than gooning (or consooming, and boomer hedonism in general).
 
Last edited:

"I don't want another Flamenco"


Later in the stream he's reacting to Idubbbz digging his own lolcow dungeon one stream at a time, and blindfires some shade over his shoulder at YMS in the process.
 
Jokixleftnut said:
Does anyone know what account is his nsfw one? I want context for the big black bull line in Robs video
Click to expand...
Scroll back in the thread.
You will see adam in a horse fursuit, or maid outfit.

You will know it when you see it; those are all from the NSFW twitter.
 
Laburnum said:
You don't want to know what Adam thinks of Jeremy Irons' voice but I'm going to remind the thread anyway:
View attachment 7954079
(X/N/A)

truly vile.mp4

Also our erstwhile YMS whiteknight has wandered off to sperg in other threads. Very unlikely it's Adam now, he'd have had too much pride not to identify himself in talk to staff before coming back here to argue about the ethics of sticking your cock in Fido. I still think it's everyone's favorite highlight furry.
Click to expand...
Wtf is up with the volume? From whisper quiet to ear damagingly loud in less than a second. It’s like a schizophrenic with parkinsons is controlling the slider.
 
So since we're doing digs about Adum and his gay nigga shit. Let me introduce you to his Spider Man Miles Morales playthrough where he makes constant gay nigga sex jokes about Miles Morales. Keep in mind in this game, he's between 15 to 17 years old. (according to google, anyway.)

Local archive:


0:57 - He asks about Miles' age, chatter tells him he's 17 and he goes "fuck" Only for a few seconds later, his friend chimes in and says "hey 17 is more than legal in Canada"

1:50 - He says that Miles is not too bad for him but says he's not tempted right now. His friend follows up with "Well if you were tempted, would you do anything?" Adum coyfully replies with "Nothing"

5:10 - A flashbang of gay nigga furry shit

7:34 - Him and his friend complain that Miles is too skinny and that they can't jerk off to him.

9:10 - Adum says he's too skinny, his friend then chimes in and says. "The age isn't the problem, if anything he's too old. The problem is that he's too skinny."

9:26 - Adum says he can easily jerk off to spider man porn if he doesn't know the age or which spider man it is.

I can't seem to find the vods anywhere, there's probably more gay nigga pedophile shit in there anyway.
 
stupid fufu said:
So since we're doing digs about Adum and his gay nigga shit. Let me introduce you to his Spider Man Miles Morales playthrough where he makes constant gay nigga sex jokes about Miles Morales. Keep in mind in this game, he's between 15 to 17 years old. (according to google, anyway.)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=BcTWQm--2OkLocal archive:
Should've been DLC - Spider-Man_ Miles Morales - Part 1.mp4

0:57 - He asks about Miles' age, chatter tells him he's 17 and he goes "fuck" Only for a few seconds later, his friend chimes in and says "hey 17 is more than legal in Canada"

1:50 - He says that Miles is not too bad for him but says he's not tempted right now. His friend follows up with "Well if you were tempted, would you do anything?" Adum coyfully replies with "Nothing"

5:10 - A flashbang of gay nigga furry shit

7:34 - Him and his friend complain that Miles is too skinny and that they can't jerk off to him.

9:10 - Adum says he's too skinny, his friend then chimes in and says. "The age isn't the problem, if anything he's too old. The problem is that he's too skinny."

9:26 - Adum says he can easily jerk off to spider man porn if he doesn't know the age or which spider man it is.

I can't seem to find the vods anywhere, there's probably more gay nigga pedophile shit in there anyway.
Click to expand...
Good to know that Adams favorite spider-Man run is sins past.
 
Laburnum said:
1757457962529.webp
Click to expand...

"Likely autistic" means not diagnosed with autism, no?

I think YMS uses the specter of autism as a shield for his inexcusable opinions. He likes that people assume that he is only taking extreme, indefensible positions because of some sort of mental deficiency. In reality, I think he just really fervently believes that he can convince people of the morality of animal sexual abuse. Calling his position at all based in "logic" reinforces his belief that he can change people's minds if he can only get them to follow his line of thought.

He isn't autistic, just an amoral egomaniac.
 
stupid fufu said:
So since we're doing digs about Adum and his gay nigga shit. Let me introduce you to his Spider Man Miles Morales playthrough where he makes constant gay nigga sex jokes about Miles Morales. Keep in mind in this game, he's between 15 to 17 years old. (according to google, anyway.)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=BcTWQm--2OkLocal archive:
Should've been DLC - Spider-Man_ Miles Morales - Part 1.mp4

0:57 - He asks about Miles' age, chatter tells him he's 17 and he goes "fuck" Only for a few seconds later, his friend chimes in and says "hey 17 is more than legal in Canada"

1:50 - He says that Miles is not too bad for him but says he's not tempted right now. His friend follows up with "Well if you were tempted, would you do anything?" Adum coyfully replies with "Nothing"

5:10 - A flashbang of gay nigga furry shit

7:34 - Him and his friend complain that Miles is too skinny and that they can't jerk off to him.

9:10 - Adum says he's too skinny, his friend then chimes in and says. "The age isn't the problem, if anything he's too old. The problem is that he's too skinny."

9:26 - Adum says he can easily jerk off to spider man porn if he doesn't know the age or which spider man it is.

I can't seem to find the vods anywhere, there's probably more gay nigga pedophile shit in there anyway.
Click to expand...
The punchline is porn. Ha ha ha ha isnt that so funny.
 
Disastrously Dumb said:
that some of his defenders immediately use the "homophobic attacks" and "homophobia" defence.
Click to expand...
YMS has been doing this for years and has conditioned his audience to parrot it for him.

In a wider sense, it’s been a common liberal talking reflex for years. In the 1990s/early 2000s Drake Bells father was called homophobic for being uncomfortable with the man molesting his son showing groomer tendencies around him. There are literally thousands of examples because it’s the leftist default now, another .exe loaded into them, they’re wired to say it, will even defend clear grooming without a second thought. The more I type the more examples I think of, so to prevent a derailing sperg, I’ll stop now. Black men do this with calling everything racist too.
McSneaks said:
I mean, it's the natural progression as soon as Trannies were accepted into it.
Click to expand...
Nah, know you’re history. Faggots were the loudest group losing their shit when soccer moms campaigned to raise the age of consent from 12 to 18. They were holding ‘civil rights’ protests over because they were being arrested for fucking in playgrounds. There’s no extra context to that btw, they were openly discussing in meetings that this was their right specifically on the basis they were gay, to the point that lesbians from that time period talk about how alienating those discussions were, since they obviously didn’t agree.

Gay men calling everything homophobic has been a thing for decades, especially to excuse their child diddling. Happens now with kink at pride, everyone who is uncomfortable is a homophobe, this is an extremely popular opinion and not only in the deepest echo chambers, and still with people defending grooming. Also don’t forget the tranny shit was initially pushed into lobby groups as a gay male sissification fetish, as far back as the 80s iirc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom