- Joined
- Feb 20, 2023
>Ban freedom of speech and burn the constitution because a crazy guy shot one person! You are no different than leftists that want to repeal the 2nd amendment after every school shooting.
>In 1770, when this country was in its birth throes, the most hated man in America was a man named Captain Thomas Preston. He was the commander of a small cadre of British soldiers who fired upon a gathering of disgruntled colonists, killing five. This event came to be known as the Boston Massacre. The five men who died as a result of this event are considered by most historians to be the first casualties of the Revolutionary War.
>As is always the case, there were two sides to the story as to why this tragedy occurred. The colonists, led primarily by Sam Adams, one of the most outspoken writers and revolutionaries of the day, claimed that the British fired upon a peaceful crowd and killed five patriots without just cause. The British soldiers claimed that they had fired upon an angry mob in self-defense.
>There are two reasons that will cause good men to abandon their long-standing, dearly held morals, values, and principles and revert more primitive, barbaric practices to resolve conflict. That is when their hearts are filled with anger or when their hearts are filled with fear.
>Because the colonists were angry over taxes imposed by the British without representation, along with other perceived injustices, and because they were fearful of the sheer might of the British Crown, in general, and of the soldiers that were now being billeted in their town to quell potential uprisings, in particular, their hearts were filled with both.
>They wanted revenge against the British captain and the British soldiers under his command. Evidence be damned, facts be damned, they wanted revenge that was swift and sure. They wanted the heads of the captain and his men on a spit.
>One man came forth and said loud and clear, "I stand for the law."
>The man that took the soldiers' case when no other man would stand in their defense was John Adams.
>John Adams, one of our nation's true founding fathers, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, our first vice president, our second president of the United States, a man of principle. (He was also Sam Adam's cousin and friend.)
>His response was said to be this: "Counsel is the last thing accused person should lack in a free country." He agreed to defend these men in spite of what it might do to his reputation, to his law practice, or to his future plans. He took the case because he believed that free men had certain rights. These were among the heartfelt principles on which he built his life.
>Those principles are woven into the fabric of our Constitution. Those principles represent our principles as Americans. Every person accused of a crime shall have the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury of his peers. Every person so accused shall have the right to face his accuser in a court of law. Every person so accused shall have the right to counsel.
>Many men and women have fought and died to preserve those principles, those rights.
>So keep that in mind when you hear someone say that this crime is too gruesome, or this person is too dangerous, or this issue is too complicated to allow those principles to stand.
>(This includes the frightened flock that today seeks to exclude terrorists from those principles.)
>Keep in mind that the very men that John Adams defended were uniformed members of an army of a foreign power that would soon become an enemy. Still, they had their day in court. There is no just cause or justification to usurp the Constitution.
>"I will serve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic."
>That is the oath we ask our president to take, together with every other person in public service. Every member of our military takes that oath. Every lawyer takes that oath. Every American citizen lives by that oath.
>It does not say, "I will serve, protect, and defend the popularity polls, or the will of the people, or the frightened masses." It does not say, "I will serve, protect, and defend the Constitution, unless.. " There are no conditions or qualifications.
>When harried and nervous people jump in front of microphones and scream and rail that we should suddenly do something in direct contravention to that upon which we have based our very system of justice; when they tell you that we should abandon that which men have fought and died for and which has worked so well since the beginning of this beautiful experiment that we call America in favor of that which we have always criticized about lesser countries...
>Kindly... invite them to pound sand.
