Dumb Shit on Wikipedia / Wikimedia Contributor General
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
[excessive citations]
lmao
lmao
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
>chairperson
Henri Barbusse
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2022
Three different styles in three paragraphs and of course the short tranny paragraph needs four citations.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2019
It's also so shoehorned, it talks about how Alhama de Granada has a mix of arab, roman and catholic styles and suddenly LOL TRANNIES LMAO
YAS KWEEN SLAYY NIGGER TRANNIES IN ANCIENT SPAIN DUUUDE
Okay I'm calling bullshit on those claims.
"WHERE IS THE PENIS ELENA? WHERE IS IT?"
"Um, uhh, it's a retractile penis! It only emerges in certain situations dood!"
Henri Barbusse
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2022
The Inquisition clearly accepted that it was a hermaphrodite, since the charges of transvestitism and sodomy were dropped and the only guilty verdict was bigamy.
Treff Matthiesen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2025
Wikipedia is refusing to classify Charlie Kirk's death as an assassination.
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
Yep, they have made it "Killing" and are using some extremely obvious rules lawyering to avoid calling it a assasination. Double rules lawyering in fact.
Kenyaware
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2024
I really don't get this. What are they trying to prove by not labeling it as an assassination?
Ed Special
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2021
How do you know it was an assassination? Maybe his neck just did that, heckin' chud.
winderson_silva
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2021
The Abortion in Africa guy when I wish a genie for mandatory abortion in Africa
Attachments
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It's amazing how much persistent bullshit on Wikipedia is just because some utter weirdo has an autistic fetish for some shit and inserts it everywhere and then monitors it like a monitor lizard getting anyone banned who is opposed to it because it's an autistic fetish, not a real thing.
And this bullshit fake encyclopedia is probably the most frequently used source for "information" by most online humans. The "encyclopedia anyone can edit." Yeah, right. Unless you're one of the chosen few favored by the Arbcom, all it takes is one obsessed moron to censor reality.
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2025
"Assassination" has a lot more gravitas and meaning than just "killing." Activist editors don't want to give the event the credit it is due because many people from the side they ideologically oppose may see it as galvanizing, therefore they wish to downplay it.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2021
There's no proof the shooter wasn't trying to kill a mosquito carrying Malaria headed for Kirk's neck chud! He could have just missed his shot and killed Kirk on accident!
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2025
In a shocking twist, Wikipedians seem to majority support changing the title of the page to "Assassination:"
However, in a cruel twist of fate, user skarz pretends this isn't the case and decides to start a vote to ignore this topic entirely for the next month:
However, in a cruel twist of fate, user skarz pretends this isn't the case and decides to start a vote to ignore this topic entirely for the next month:
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2022
They are experts at rules lawyering. If it looks like the votes will not go the way they want, then the voting is stopped. Simple as.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2019
Say. His. Name. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Reactions:
x 10 x 2
x 10 x 2
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2019
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2025
Anybody know if "Silverseren" has ever had any phonebooking done? I see them crawling around and rules lawyering on controversial talk pages all the time, almost always trying to either obfuscate the information or get rid of it, being extremely smug while doing it.