Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
nym said:
And I think it should go without saying, but I keep seeing elsewhere all the "he was a Trump supporter!" stuff; no, of course he didn't donate to Trump, as if that wasn't obvious. (Well there was always the possibility he was of the nihilistic groyper type and did, but then you're not talking about anything like a standard (R) anyway.)
View attachment 7906778
Click to expand...
accelerationist is still possible though increasingly unlikely
 
Chuck 'n Geck said:
...I'm getting more and more convinced Tyler's being used as the second decoy, and that this thread's getting filled with gullible retards.

How could a fucking 22yo Discord shitten possibly get a 200m shot on his first try, get a Jooeesh gramps whose job was to run around and shout "KILL MEH" and get out of the scene undetected, despite being surrounded by security on all sides - all of that at once?

This smells like a paid assassination to me.
Click to expand...
...okay, genuine question, if hitting stuff with a Mauser 30-06 from 200 yards is no biggie, how realistic would it be for Tyler to hit Kirk in ONE, SINGLE shot from this distance? In fact, how likely is it that Tyler, in his pro-troonoid rage, took really good care of the Mauser and kept it cool? That should probably increase the accuracy by a lot. Was that even his rifle to begin with, or did he borrow that, and the ammo he channelled his inner Luigi into?

Tangentially related (secondary sauce):
 
I thought I could not hate progressive anymore than I already did, but seeing even the "good ones" go full mask off and reveal that they do not have souls has made me realize that I was wrong; I can indeed hate progressives more than I already did. I do not want to get overly optimistic that retaliation will actually occur, but rest assured, if it does, I will be dancing on your graves and singing a jaunty tune while I do it. The difference is that they pushed me to this point through actions, and I have been shown that words do nothing to sway them. The only thing they seem to comprehend is violence.
Inco G. Nito said:
Given that .30-06 is a round larger than 7.62x51mm, and Ronnie McNutt completely removed his head with 7.62 (Granted, at point-blank range). Is it totally reasonable that at 200 yards the round fired from the rifle would have lost enough energy to just punch a hole through him like it did and not practically blow Charlie Kirk's head off? One of my close friends isn't convinced that the rifle presented to us could have been the one that made the shot because of how relatively clean the wound was. I also just want to hear Kiwi's thoughts.
Click to expand...
Short answer, no. A drop in 700 ft-lbs is substantial, but 2000 ft-lbs is still absurdly powerful. For context, at the muzzle, a .223/5.56 round (standard AR-15 round) is 1150 ft-lbs at the muzzle. Also, to clarify, even with this much power, the round wouldn't "blow his head off". This wound is very consistent with what a 30 caliber, full sized cartridge would do to a man. Bullets aren't magic grenades.

Armscor-30-06-165-grain-AccuBond-ballistics-chart.webp
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know if this is actually the shooter's discord? Seems too perfect to be true but it's going around on twitter.
G0qget-bcAUtikW.webp


Also, 'non-driver' continues to be a MASSIVE RED FLAG.
G0pxvumbsAAdq0y.webp
 
Last edited:
UmQasaan said:
How the fuck does the FBI keep getting bailed out? McDonalds? Dad turning them in? 48 hours is plenty of time to flee the country, but these Zoomer fugitives go back to their lives as if nothing has happened
Click to expand...
I mean they released multiple images of the shooter. His parents recognized him, probably because they still do his laundry. And they dropped the dime on him. That's actually how real Police Work goes. They don't have magical AI databases that can identify the killer from a blurry screenshot. All those TV crime shows are complete bullshit.

This is actually rather good police work. They were able to use available video of the event. Both security footage and people's phone video. To identify the individual suspect by what he was wearing and track his movements through the event. They released images showing his appearance that day including his clothing. Somebody was able to recognize him from that. And his family turned him in.

This is exactly how this sort of thing usually goes.
 
Been going through my social media and seeing how many people I know IRL that are just gravedancing right now makes me feel vindicated not being further involved with them.

Funniest shit I saw was a local comedian I follow deactivating his FaceBook after getting dog piled on for his weapons-grade takes about Kirk.

One other thing I've seen is the usual talking heads on Xitter claiming Charlie Kirk dehumanizing the people he debated. No, they dehumanized themselves, he clocked them politely and they're angry about it.

One thing to keep in mind is that for all the times Kirk has invited people to step up and defend their positions and beliefs, maybe even challenge his, if it were a progressive liberal holding the same speaking rallies as TPUSA, the same courtesies Kirk extended wouldn't be extended to him or others like him.
 
It's funny to me seeing you lefties here, using a forum owned by someone far more extremely against your ideals than you can possibly imagine, and thinking you're going to change any minds here with your typically dishonest conversational tactics. You're only convincing people like me of my stance. You don't seem to get that what Kirk's murder signals is that the time for listening to your bullshit is over. And what are you doing? Here telling us more of your bullshit. Keep trying, child, keep trying.
 
nym said:
And I think it should go without saying, but I keep seeing elsewhere all the "he was a Trump supporter!" stuff; no, of course he didn't donate to Trump, as if that wasn't obvious. (Well there was always the possibility he was of the nihilistic groyper type and did, but then you're not talking about anything like a standard (R) anyway.)
View attachment 7906778
Click to expand...
Screenshot 2025-09-12 124016.webp

I'm actually surprised to find people fighting back against this misinfo on Reddit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"sassinate" As a discord username seems too on the nose, I think it's another impersonator unless there's more evidence connecting him to that account.
 
Kinda funny watching traditional media trying to walk back the incitement they’ve been engaging in for years.

Your job, CNN, is to sell Ozempic.
 
Soapmore said:
It's funny to me seeing you lefties here, using a forum owned by someone far more extremely against your ideals than you can possibly imagine, and thinking you're going to change any minds here with your typically dishonest conversational tactics. You're only convincing people like me of my stance. You don't seem to get that what Kirk's murder signals is that the time for listening to your bullshit is over. And what are you doing? Here telling us more of your bullshit. Keep trying, child, keep trying.
Click to expand...
Why does it matter what the forum owner believes? I think most are here for the lolcows, regardless of if they are left, right, or don't identify themselves in either of those dumbass categories
 
Does the father get the bounty, if he's the one who reported him, and if he is indeed the killer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom