Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Seeing the absolute inhumanity from the degenerate faggots that house X and Reddit has definitely changed something within me. I’ve never been too politically brained but now I’m feeling very strongly about upholding conservative values. Fuck sickos.
 
- Recognized by a pastor
- Can shoot accurately at a distance of 200 yards
- Has the athleticism to jump down off a 20ft roof and run away

This ain't pointing to a lefty, is it?

The troon who killed all those kids at the Catholic school went there and his mom was a teacher there.

Any retard can shoot accurately at 200 yards.

Skinny noodle legs are pliable.
 
You can tell if somebody is a leftist if they use the passive tense to talk about this.
It happened in the past and he is dead, so what tense should they be using?
Grammar time!

@Slap47 a filthy subhuman solzhenitsyn and also an illiterate retard. In identifying the issue with these headlines, he said "passive tense". There's no such thing. There's PAST TENSE and PASSIVE VOICE. Both are appropriate. Active voice is also appropriate.

What's inappropriate and subhuman about these headlines is INTRANSITIVE VERBS and generally word choice. Charlie Kirk was MURDERED, ASSASSINATED if you want to be fancy, KILLED if you're a wikipedo. These are all transitive verbs: they allow for an object.
"A tranny murdered Charlie Kirk." (past tense, active voice, transitive)
"Charlie Kirk was murdered by a tranny." (past tense, passive voice, transitive)

Passive voice allows dropping the actor, which is a favorite trick of journos:
"Charlie Kirk was murdered." [by whom? we hid that, how convenient] (past tense, passive voice, transitive)

DIED and PASSED AWAY are intransitive verbs. The victim is the actor, there's no other entity, causality is completely destroyed and can't be questioned.
"Charlie Kirk died." (past tense, active voice, intransitive)
 
Unfortunately the only hook the media needs is "registered Republican" or even "raised by a pastor."

People are too retarded to realize that political party affiliation is just a piece of paper. A form you fill out and can change at any time. You could change your political party with the county 5 times in the same week and even create your own party.

The only way to truly understand someone's leanings is the inevitable social media/internet footprint they leave. The truly smart people of the 21st century will have theirs very carefully curated. Just enough to be milquetoast but not odd enough in the sense that they don't have one as having nothing is suspicious by itself.
 
"He died", "he passed away" vs "was assassinated" "was murdered"
I don't think that's necessarily true -- you might choose "was assassinated" over "died" if you want to draw attention to the violent nature of the event. "He passed away" is good for an obituary; "he was murdered" is good for an argument with an apologist for the murder.

Hey, at least Stephen King was willing to forthrightly admit he made an error. A low bar, perhaps, but many fail to clear it.
 

Attachments

  • doubt.webp
    doubt.webp
    7.7 KB · Views: 15
Its a great time to watch the US from afar!
Retards on both sides are working overtime to escalate tensions and the media keeps fanning the flames that divide your country. At this pace there will be unprecedented violence and chaos in the years to come.

I hope you guys are armed and dont live in a major city!
 
28/29 years of age is what Trump said

1757681053282.webp
Big if true. I can't actually find reference to this on the link, so maybe Google grabbed it from some related page on the site when it was crawled.
 
If that happens they can't just delete all his socials and refuse to release his manifesto.
I doubt he had a manifesto. At this point my bets are just an angry, jealous, misanthrope with no consistent ideology. Kirk was murdered because he was a famous guy and killing a famous guy made this shithead feel important and powerful.

Kirk just happened to book an appearance some place this guy was familiar with, it was this nasty little man’s big opportunity.

He probably comes from a hard or fucked up family background. I think it’s likely he joined the military (or wanted to), but it didn’t pan out. If he did he probably got booted for mental health issues or something else. Maybe tried to get a disability check or got a partial one. It was a very specific shirt to wear, I don’t think it was some lefty camouflage. (That would have been a MAGA shirt or something similar)

He went to UVU thanks to the GI Bill but that probably didn’t pan out either, or he got a degree but can’t hold a job. He’s pretty miserable loner who spends too much time online.

Idk I don’t get the idea he’s particularly ideological driven, just an angry jealous misanthrope who wanted to kill a successful, famous person but not a lot of opportunities for it in central Utah. He probably did spend a lot of time with online brain rot but that’s one reason he was aware of Charlie Kirk or why Kirk loomed large in his imagination.

He could have killed Kirk out of pure jealously and resentment. Seems like all the venom and hate Kirk received from groypers was because he was a clean cut, successful conservative, poster boy with a pretty wife and children. It made the incels seethe so hard.

In the modern era these shooters just want infamy and a political target is guaranteed to kick up a hornet’s nest. He feels very important and powerful now, he thinks he has fulfilled some destiny he was meant for in the retarded hero, or villain, narrative in his angry rotten brain.
 
Back
Top Bottom