Because Charlie Kirk and his group didn't want to pay for all that security required for potentially securing rooftops and what not. The local police weren't willing to cover that expense for them either. They'd essentially have to lock down campus to have stuff like the rooftops secured, anyways. That's a waste of money and peoples time to do each time an activist decides to visit a college campus for a meet and greet or whatever the fuck this Charlie Kirk guy was doing. Besides, I believe in Utah, people can carry guns on college campuses without being harassed by the authorities. From what I understand, this Charlie Kirk was a big 2nd Amendment rights activist type among other things and probably would've been opposed to having the authorities violate people's rights just so he can visit the campus for a talk or whatever. It'd definitely would have been politically unwise for him to try to have the authorities try to prevent people from bringing a gun on campus just so he can have a chit chat with college kids given his views
dude stop the cap. im italian living in italy he doesnt look like us
they will just excommunicate them and then kill em.
What is that suppose to prove?
Almost like they're playing dumb; he's an asset.
Keep in mind so far these ghouls are:
Respectfully disagree. I'm already anti-free speech because I believe conscious dishonesty should be illegal, and if I'm going to be anti-free speech, I'm going to go all-in on credible threats of violence as well. I understand speech can be restricted to a degree I personally may not like, and I accept that. I don't believe there are any significant amount of free-speech absolutists that exist, if people were actually honest with themselves. The declaration of free speech absolutism is either being dishonest with one's self, or admitting that the person believes there is absolutely nothing they would take a moral stand against someone saying, which I find insane and cowardly.
not only is it impossible to see in any of these images, i also doubt this guy whose made a clear effort into looking unassuming would paint his nails for this occasion.
Nothing is going to happen. Leftists aren't even clutching their pearls about extremism anymore, they're openly telling right-wingers that they're cringe, gay and won't do shit. Tensions will start dying down once the shooter gets caught and Kirk's casket gets buried, and soon enough, it will be like it never even happened.
Trust the plan. I bet they'll have the shooter in custody in 2 weeks, tops.
For a brief moment I was convinced that the shooter's haircut looks like that dudes haircut when shortened. But even this would prove nothing.
Yeah already a misinformation campaign on social media saying the guy next to him is his friend Christian author Frank Turek, which is partially true he's the older guy with glasses and a blue shirt to his far right. The dudes people are questioning are his ex-military security guards behind him. One wearing white, the other black. Those are definitely military hand gestures. Some spergs are already saying the whole thing was staged, but why? That makes no sense. It's not like he can just reappear like Jesus after the crucifixion again.
I recently got in a relationship and she smugposted about this so I sent her the video of him getting shot in real time. She shut up and I told her what she said was ugly. It's remarkably common. They're very detached from violence and you need to make them see what they're being so glib about.
At this point, there have already been dozens of firings that I'm aware of, from someone who lost their job at an ice cream shop to professionals who have had their entire careers derailed. And those are just the ones I've come across online. Things are already serious for a lot of people.
Respectfully, with no implications being made whatsoever, would you agree or disagree with the notion that his ideology is a more extreme version of yours?