Is political violence acceptable? Is it hypocritical to gravedance on tranny suicides and then get upset about gravedancing on political violence?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Some guy murdered the human incarnation of taco bell's mild sauce packet of political takes for confirmed political tranny reasons, then several of the subhumans celebrated it en masse. If David Duke got shot and killed by some homosexual-in-black and it was celebrated it would at least be understandable given his level of takes I would still call it insane since you shouldn't be murdering people for bad opinions(despite the giga-chad memes telling you otherwise) but it really highlights the level of incompatible reality were dealing with here.
CharlieKirk.webp
 
I don't know how you can be on the left. If you are, at this point you are a body for the communists to overthrow the country. Democratic socialists, social democrats, they are all useful idiots for red revolutionaries. The proof is that its not a contest of ideas, clearly. Right wingers keep getting shot at. Scalise, Trump, Kirk...and thats just assassinations. In the cities you have rampant gang crime, migrant crime, and the police can't stop it because the lefty DAs won't prosecute and imprison resulting in things like Iryna's death.

You are on the left? You are on the side of insanity, disorder, and chaos.

Theres no social contract here. The left is literally out to overthrow the government and steal everything for their movement. All of their power comes from collective misery, the warping of bodies and minds with chemicals and drugs, and propaganda.

The worst part is if you asked the left this question they would moviebob you with "bad targets not bad tactics". So I really don't know how you can ask this question. The only people engaging in it are going to be people who reason things out.

Its optimistic to assume that most people can even create a theory of mind for politics. Thats why in america most people couldnt vote. There are always more ignorant people than knowledgeable in any given area. The left just prey on them and give them the drugs to stay ignorant.
 
rapefugee said:
The Republican Senator Mike Lee joked about the Democrat politicians in Minnesota when they were murdered.
View attachment 7901738
Click to expand...
Why exactly do you think I endorse that?

It is also another false equivalence.
A single faggot saying it vs thousands in the ideology doing it.
The victim was also an elected official, which is different from a private citizen.

And, as a last thing, this is not a single occurance.
Remember how many people were disappointed when Trump narrowly escaped assassination?

This is way more of a problem on the left, and the left is way more radicalized in America right now.

If you deny this, you are disingenuous or delusional.
 
Just Another Rando said:
We live in a time that makes intentions very clear, I refuse to turn my back on enemies who scream their intentions on xitter, reddit, etc.
I don't think they want me dead. They want me dead.
Click to expand...
You sound exactly like a tranny. I don't know how many times I've seen them say that EXACT SAME LINE. "They want me dead". literally the same take as the trannies have.

How can you say that shit and not see that you are buying into the bullshit?
 
prollyanotherlurker said:
The other one, since you didn't actually give any real example to show what you are talking about, I'm not even going to try finding because I have no clue where to even look.
Click to expand...
I suspect you're being purposefully obtuse but I'll humor you. I don't remember enough about the mountain climbing tranny to find the thread, but I found two threads for the bridge tranny:
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/tranny-sideshows-on-social-media.33028/page-6819#post-21529010
https://kiwifarms.st/threads/debate...-death-and-how-it-will-save-le-westtm.220932/
 
Political violence has been the norm all through history. The people who tell you it's a bad thing are the ones who regularly employ political violence and want to maintain a monopoly on it in order to retain their power.
 
prollyanotherlurker said:
You sound exactly like a tranny. I don't know how many times I've seen them say that EXACT SAME LINE. "They want me dead". literally the same take as the trannies have.

How can you say that shit and not see that you are buying into the bullshit?
Click to expand...
Unlike a tranny I am not on a 1000+ meds to convince me that cutting my dick off is a good idea. You see God blessed me with this amazing gift of pattern recognition, this gift allows me to recognize that when someone says a variation of "I'm going to kill you" I recognize that they want to kill me. What else could they mean by it?

I am curious though, what bullshit am I buying into?
 
rapefugee said:
Charlie Kirk said the 1964 Civil Rights act was a mistake, and that gays should be stoned to death. These might be normal views for KF and /pol/, but they aren't mild for normies.
Ironically, he also said that kids should watch public executions, that empathy was a bad thing, and that gun deaths were worth it.


Edit:
No, I'm not using this to justify his death.
Click to expand...

this collection of claims is mind-bogglingly retarded. you'd think there'd maybe be at least a crumb of truth here, but no. I sat through every one of those retarded articles and they're all blatantly taken out of context lol. here's the tl;dr:

the 1964 Civil Rights Act: this comes from a diatribe about how MLK was a bad person (mostly true) and that his lionization is ridiculous (absolutely true) and that the Civil Rights Act has fueled a false equality that has become what is now known as DEI (undeniably true)
“I have a very, very radical view on this, but I can defend it, and I’ve thought about it,” Kirk said at America Fest. “We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s.”
[...]
Kirk argues that the Civil Rights Act, which bars discrimination on the basis of race, ushered in a “permanent DEI-type bureaucracy,” referring to diversity, equity, and inclusion. He illustrated how the law has gone wrong when responding to a question from a student who said they became the subject of a Title IX investigation after posting an Instagram story mocking transgender people. Title IX, which was passed as part of the Education Amendments of 1972, bans schools that receive federal funding from discriminating on the basis of sex. King was assassinated four years prior, in 1968.

“The courts have been really weak on this,” Kirk told the America Fest crowd. “Federal courts just yield to the Civil Rights Act as if it's the actual American Constitution.” The law is ultimately a way to “re-found the county” and “a way to get rid of the First Amendment,” according to Kirk.

gays should be stoned to death: this guy already posted the video:
Right Cross said:
Here is a short clip of context where that actually came from.
Click to expand...
he's talking with somebody who's trying to say the Bible is against hatred by quoting Leviticus, which Charlie then points out also says to stone men for sleeping with each other lol.

kids should watch public executions: he's arguing for public executions as a way of discouraging crime. he says kids as young as 12 should watch so they understand the consequences of committing serious crimes.
KIRK: All of a sudden, you look at some of these savages. Like, in Indiana, there was this guy that went in and killed a pregnant woman and her three kids. And you know what? I wanna watch that execution. That'll make my day better. I wanna see him on a public block and get him be publicly executed. And I think that would be justice. You think children should have -- you should see it? What is the age -- at what age should you start to see public execution?

BOWYER: 16.

NEFF: I think you could do it earlier. I think you -- maybe at age 12. 6th grade or so. You are a person -- you know, they're old enough to -- you don't need to, like, really wallow in it and have them be broken on a wheel or anything. But if it was something like chopping -- you know, if we had a guillotine or something.

BOWYER:I think it's the age where they can't be, you know, it's -- I think it's too early and you become desensitized to maybe like this. I think it's when you can actually embrace --

KIRK: But it should also be taken in a holy way --

BOWYER: The meaning. The meaning.

KIRK: And I don't mean holy in a bad way. I mean that, like, this is heavy.

NEFF: Bluntly, we have kids who are 14 who are committing carjackings --

KIRK: A hundred percent.

NEFF: In cities and doing --

KIRK: Yes.

NEFF: Bad stuff. And I think if you sent the message to them, if you do a bad crime, you will die, and it will be like this, and that will be you, it would be a positive message.
[5:21 PM]
KIRK: Here's a question for anyone that might be not persuaded. Would crime go up or down?

BOWYER: It would go way down.

KIRK: Down. So why is this even a question?

empathy is a bad thing: he's talking about the democrats' disingenuous political communication strategy. there is no way to seriously take this as an assertion that people should not have empathy.
So the new communications strategy for Democrats, now that their polling advantage is collapsing in every single state… collapsing in Ohio. It's collapsing even in Arizona. It is now a race where Blake Masters is in striking distance. Kari Lake is doing very, very well. The new communications strategy is not to do what Bill Clinton used to do, where he would say, "I feel your pain." Instead, it is to say, "You're actually not in pain." So let's just, little, very short clip. Bill Clinton in the 1990s. It was all about empathy and sympathy. I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.

gun deaths are worth it: he says that gun violence is a lamentable but acceptable cost for the right to bear arms, not because gun violence isn't tragic, but because an armed citizenry is just that important.
You will never live in a society when you have an armed citizenry and you won't have a single gun death. That is nonsense. It's drivel. But I am, I, I — I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.

to say these things all prove that Charlie Kirk was somehow tempting fate is heinously disingenuous and indeed retarded. this post alone should earn you a pink triangle of shame, faggot.
 
Last edited:
rapefugee said:
Many Republicans made jokes about Nancy Pelosi's husband when he was attacked.
Click to expand...
That also wasn’t an assassination, that was him being attacked by a guy who he was fucking behind his gross wife’s back. It was a scenario straight out of a comedy sketch. How do you not see the blatant difference between that and a public assassination? Especially when one was the husband of a prominent politician having gay sex behind her back and the other was a youtuber who didn’t have actual political power?
 
It doesn't matter if it's hypocritical or not. Most people IRL still have a lot to lose.
Only those with nothing to lose will start gunning down others only for them to be forgotten two weeks later. His children did not deserve to see him die, though.

The thing is, many opportunistic people love when such violent incidents happen. Once people are psychologically vulnerable, they will listen to anyone and anything.
They will milk his and that Ukrainian woman's deaths to groom more people to their side. Yes, grooming.

For example, Leftists do the same fucking thing. They will show you Palestinian child gore and make you sad and emotionally vulnerable, it's when you're emotionally vulnerable that you will listen to them and join their side. This trick is old, but it's very effective.
 
What even is this question and premise?
How are tranny suicides comparable to political assassinations.
Trannys are mentally ill, will always be mentally ill, and no amount of 'affirmation' is going to change that.
So you are comparing the tragedy of mental illness to political violence.
 
Null said:
yes
Click to expand...
And you still wonder why your bank accounts keeping getting shut down.
prollyanotherlurker said:
You sound exactly like a tranny. I don't know how many times I've seen them say that EXACT SAME LINE. "They want me dead". literally the same take as the trannies have.

How can you say that shit and not see that you are buying into the bullshit?
Click to expand...
Because they want the same special victim treatment and coddling that they think trannies get. It's also why they sound exactly like niggers complaining about whitey whenever they rant about the jews.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom