Is political violence acceptable? Is it hypocritical to gravedance on tranny suicides and then get upset about gravedancing on political violence?

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
rapefugee said:
Charlie Kirk said the 1964 Civil Rights act was a mistake, and that gays should be stoned to death. These might be normal views for KF and /pol/, but they aren't mild for normies.
Ironically, he also said that kids should watch public executions, that empathy was a bad thing, and that gun deaths were worth it.
Click to expand...
I'm sure that's exactly what Charlie Kirk said and there is no nuance being left out by the dedicated journalists of currentaffairs, snopes, dailykos, mediamatters. These sources are propaganda in the literal sense. There's not a single relevant clip in any of these outlets, just far left character assassination which unsurprisingly lead to Charlie's actual assassination.
 
thegunbuilderguy said:
View attachment 7901557
This is from where the article claims is the proof
a list with no source whatsoever and has clear signs of being written by someone who doesn't like him
not only are you a retard
you're a journo-toe-sucking nigger and should be stoned to death

Context: the bible mentions stoning for a lot of things, not just gays, he says he understand but doesn't condone

That's it
I hope you kill yourself
Click to expand...
Ted's Cabin said:
I love having to sort through 200 pages of political schizo babble about what someone said, instead of just linking to what they said. Or better yet, clip it here and embed. If you had to see an opinion that wasn't filtered through some mainstream media source, would you die?
Click to expand...

Ok I found other sources for what he said about stoning.
×<MEDIA>@https://uploads.kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion
 

Attachments

  • clip.mp4
    834.6 KB
rapefugee said:
Charlie Kirk said that if his 10yo daughter gets pregnant through rape, the baby should be delivered rather than aborted. Source:
Click to expand...
Charlie Kirk wasn't as moderate as some people in this thread, other threads on this site, and elsewhere on the internet like to claim he is, true enough.

This still doesn't mean he deserved to be murdered for expressing his views in public, retard.
 
Last edited:
Team TERF said:
Are you retarded? There's a difference between not wanting whores using abortion as a means of birth control and subjecting a 10-year-old child to a biological process that her body is not ready for. That will physically and emotionally traumatize her, possibly kill her. After a pedophile raped her.

Kirk was a lot of things but "mild" and "not extremist" isn't one of them.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry to tell you that you live in a bubble, but the pro-life position is not extremist, and that is still true even when you like to make up theoretical pedophile rape scenarios involving the small children of people you disagree with to justify your convenience abortions. Yes, shockingly, people will not just readily agree to kill babies when you make up horrific hypotheticals as a "gotcha" attempt, and when your gotcha doesn't work, you don't get to point the finger and call it extremist; you're just batshit insane.

The More You Know 🌈⭐
 
rapefugee said:
Ok I found other sources for what he said about stoning.
×<MEDIA>@https://uploads.kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojhmqruw2nit3uejrpiagrxeuxiyxcyd.onion
Click to expand...
Yeah and conventiently cut out of context.
He was telling some troon/teacher lbgtq activist that was at a school or something preaching "love your neighbor as yourself" but conveniently ignoring the loine about stoning gays to death a few pages before that sentence, and how that's hypocritical.
 
rapefugee said:
Charlie Kirk said the 1964 Civil Rights act was a mistake, and that gays should be stoned to death. These might be normal views for KF and /pol/, but they aren't mild for normies.
Ironically, he also said that kids should watch public executions, that empathy was a bad thing, and that gun deaths were worth it.
Click to expand...
You know, let's pretend for just a moment that this is 100% true on its face and not an extremely bad faith interpretation bordering on defamation. (It is) But fine. Let's say it's true. So what? He has mean opinions? Dude was a father of a three and one year old who loved him. And we call him evil and kill him. Yet we exalt and enrich those which have committed far worse acts than merely holding to wrongthink. Floyd, obviously, and his statues. Tyreek Hill, abuser, wife beater, absent father, gets to have a multi-million dollar career and the admiration of literally millions. Everyone would rightfully be upset if he is murdered; Hell, people sperged out just because he got pulled over one time by a spic cop and demanded immediate police reform. But apparently, on the other hand, the death of a father who engaged in good faith, open dialogue warrants celebration. Cause his opinions were 'icky. in the 21st century. I'm sure you are probably just trolling with this post, but I do think that this is good for people to think about as we continue on.
 
rapefugee said:
Charlie Kirk said the 1964 Civil Rights act was a mistake,
Click to expand...
It was.

Freedom of association baby.

As a faggot, if someone hates my gay ass, please tell me so I don't give you my hard earned money.
rapefugee said:
and that gays should be stoned to death.
Click to expand...
He was rebutting a point where people tried using Leviticus to attack Christians.
rapefugee said:
These might be normal views for KF and /pol/, but they aren't mild for normies.
Ironically, he also said that kids should watch public executions,
Click to expand...
They are normal views save the quote mining.
rapefugee said:
that empathy was a bad thing,
Click to expand...
He was for sympathy not empathy.

Yeah... Germany felt sorry for the migrants flooding in in the 2010's to now. Currently, Germany have AfD since they were too empathetic.

AfD wouldn't be my ideal choice for a society nor would Trump be my ideal choice for President.

But fucking empathy for the migrants and illegal aliens. Now we have close to 16 million of them and the left is actively objecting to deporting anyone save the most harden criminals as that's tearing families and communities apart.

I want the fuzzy and warm late 1990s. I want to go back to when Sweden was nearly all white where I could go and maybe meet up with some Swedish twink so we could get high WITHOUT the chance of being killed by 3rd World Savages.

But NO! Fucking Empathy let the shitty people in.
rapefugee said:
and that gun deaths were worth it.
Click to expand...
Yes, they are.

Personally, their is a cost to any right. The right to own a gun for self defense and thus defending my right to life can come at the cost of other losing their lives to suicide or murder.

Here his EMPATHY remark comes in, while a suicide is tragic; a person desire to kill themselves does not override my right to protect my life from an aggressor.
Go fuck yourself, your gish gallops, and quote mining..

That shit may work on your coworkers or your family but I won't work on me or the Farms.

I have been dealing with filth like you since 9/11.
 
To answer the question: no to the first, and yes to the second.

Disregarding the topic of Charlie Kirk, as I don't really know much about his beliefs, I do believe that, no matter what kind of vitriol is being said from some political influencers like Hasan Piker or Destiny, I do not believe either should be killed. Do they need some sort of wake up call? Sure, but being shot isn't what I want to happen to them.

On the topic of the second question, yes. As much as I find trannies insufferable faggots, I only wish nothing but the absolute best for them. They need to be better, not worse. Gravedancing and wishing violence for a group is the reason why the Civil Rights Movement was effective. Difference is, black people do deserve rights, while Trannies need to better themselves. Trannies do NOT need a victory, and I will kill myself 41% style in a future where trannies become a heckin' valid minority.

HOWEVER... I do believe people should be able to gravedance (NOT threaten, that is different). It's disgusting and immoral, yes, but if we tried to crack down on it, whats to say the other side, or even our side, decides to crack down on other types of speech like, lets say, criticizing Trump or the president after him? Trying to enforce rules saying "nuh uh you can't celebrate or joke about this someone's death" feels like an attack on the 1st amendment. Hell, we got ways to tell people who do gravedance that they are an asshole (emojis, replies, ETC.), So I don't know why we would have to ban gravedancing on different platforms (Bluesky, I believe, has done that, hence why I am saying this). But hey, maybe that is just me autistically thinking things too deep.

Essentially, no matter what, I feel people shouldn't kill others, even if one side nudges a "particular motive". I also don't believe people should gravedance, but instead of banning gravedancing, we just point and laugh and call them a bumbling retard.
 
FunPosting101 said:
Charlie Kirk isn't as moderate as some people in this thread, other threads on this site, and elsewhere on the internet like to claim he is, true enough.

This still doesn't mean he deserved to be murdered for expressing his views in public, retard.
Click to expand...
I didn't say he deserved it.
 
rapefugee said:
Charlie Kirk said that if his 10yo daughter gets pregnant through rape, the baby should be delivered rather than aborted. Source:
Click to expand...
Yeah that’s pretty logically consistent given he believed abortion is murder and the baby doesn’t carry the weight of its fathers sins.

What a stupid fucking cope. I hope you get paid to be this retarded
 
Here's how I feel about gravedancing, either its all ok or none of it is. I dont care if people grave dance no matter who it is. But if you're gonna grave dance on someone you don't like then cry and shit yourself when someone you like gets grave danced on, maybe you shouldn't do it at all.
 
Squawking Macaw said:
The Dead by Daylight tranny voice actor who died of stiff person syndrome.
The tranny who fell off a mountain while hiking.
The 17-year-old tranny who jumped off a bridge.

Off the top of my head. Only the last one was a suicide but regardless, their deaths were celebrated here and those who didn't celebrate were called moralfags.
Click to expand...
Closest and most recent analog I can think of to Charlie Kirk would be this thread
Hack for crack

Thread 'Chud impersonating a cop is shooting D lawmakers'


In Minnesota, two Democratic state legislators, Senator John Hoffman and Representative Melissa Hortman, along with their spouses, were shot at their homes in Champlin and Brooklyn Park, respectively. The attacks, believed to be targeted, were carried out by a suspect impersonating a law enforcement officer. The suspect, described as a white male dressed in police-like attire, remains at large, leading to a shelter-in-place order in the affected areas and a broader manhunt.
Reactions:Informative x 52 Winner x 15 Like x 8 Semper Fidelis x 1 Horrifying x 24 Thunk-Provoking x 3 Optimistic x 1
 
Squawking Macaw said:
The Dead by Daylight tranny voice actor who died of stiff person syndrome.
The tranny who fell off a mountain while hiking.
The 17-year-old tranny who jumped off a bridge.

Off the top of my head. Only the last one was a suicide but regardless, their deaths were celebrated here and those who didn't celebrate were called moralfags.
Click to expand...
BrunoMattei

Thread 'Dead by Daylight and other Asymmetric Slasher Games'

First time community thread for a game. Dead by Daylight is a unique case for its community because the title is niche but not niche enough. It's just obscure enough where drama and big game updates aren't covered by the gaming sites. Despite the fact that the game features Leatherface, one of the Saw Killers (since the movies have multiple killers), Michael Myers, Ghostface, the Demogorgon from Stranger Things, and Freddy Kruger (sadly, not based on Robert Englund and instead based on the remake and he doesn't talk either). Plus it's been around for 3 years and is slowly gaining new...
Reactions:Informative x 16 Like x 7 Winner x 3 Semper Fidelis x 1

If this is the thread you are talking about. It seems a bit disingenuous to say people were just celebrating. I see people saying shit there responding to people coming in blaming the forum for them dying.

The other one, since you didn't actually give any real example to show what you are talking about, I'm not even going to try finding because I have no clue where to even look.
 
here is my sub 80IQ op-ed:
you feel sad for the 12 year old child that was manipulated by his abuser, you laugh at the 30 year old deranged psychopath necking himself after spending years screaming bloody murder at his parents, his former friends and the Internet at large for not playing pretend.
I am a very stupid man who pays attention to very little, so my opinion of Charlie Kirk comes post mortem. If he truly was a milquetoast neo-con then America has truly run out the middle ground. grey has been eliminated from the moral spectrum and its either play ball or get stabbed/shot.
pls donate to my patreon so I continue my speech therapy classes at nightschool thank u :-)
 
rapefugee said:
that empathy was a bad thing
Click to expand...

Where's the lie? Full quote, in context, from his radio show:

So let's just, little, very short clip. Bill Clinton in the 1990s. It was all about empathy and sympathy. I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That's a separate topic for a different time.
Click to expand...

The whole idea that a politician feels what you feel, or ought to feel what you feel, is indeed absolutely insane and harmful. You can share feelings with someone close to you. A politician does not actually look out at a mass of hundreds of millions or even billions of people and channel each and every one of their feelings, experiencing them in his own soul. Believing that he does is bullshit, and it is absolutely harmful that we are supposed to think they do or make it the basis of public policy.

And are you saying that he deserved to get shot in the throat for saying that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom