Is political violence acceptable? Is it hypocritical to gravedance on tranny suicides and then get upset about gravedancing on political violence?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
> Is it hypocritical to gravedance on tranny suicides and then get upset about gravedancing on political violence?
@Null
Imo, no.
The thread title reminds a lot of something someone said on a podcast about being Mad on the Internet.
:null: "it's funny to see someone trip and fall, it's not funny when you walk up to someone and just bash them in the back of the head with a baseball bat". I don't think people killing themselves is funny either, I am not going to get upset over other people who do find it funny though. It's really not the same at laughing at someone getting murdered, especially if they weren't an aggressor.
 
Very Professional said:
ut I don't know how anyone can be so retarded to gravedance Charlie Kirk. Kirk was harmless, in any circle further right than the "For the love of God just let me grill!" crowd he was a bum. His entire MO was talking down to shitlibs in a slightly smug tone.
Click to expand...
That's my point. I know I'm repeating myself, but what on Earth did that guy do to deserve what happened to him?
 
Preacher ✝ said:
I think there's a difference between gravedancing and gallows humor. Some people deal with tragic events through laughter.

This is gallows humor:
FCharlieKirk.mp4


This is gravedancing:
View attachment 7901221

And I would say the difference is a matter of spitefulness and genuine celebration vs being tongue in cheek and actually funny.
Click to expand...
My friend messaging me about it framing it like he got killed by the fucking Floigan bros. WOULD be the prime example of gallows humor if we were not so utterly sure the Floigans were behind it. No merriment, no dancing. Only Moigle and Hoigle, the sick fucking bastards.
 
Trannies and far leftists think words are violence. This is only going to get worse until they actually do something to crack down on the deranged freaks. You might not like Sam Hyde, but when he said the left wants you dead, your kids raped and brainwashed and they think it's funny, he was pretty spot on.
 
As an addendum, the fucking state of the American Left is on full display with those reactions.
MSM, loons on Reddit, Twitter and Bluesky, even members of congress either celebrate, victim blame or deflect.
All they had to do is say something like "I disavow any political violence, my thoughts are with his family" or even "I am not sad about his passing, but I disavow political assassination".
Thousands of pricks were not even able to do that, even fags in this forum.

You know who managed to do that? Cenk Uygur.
They are way more radical, hateful and extremist than the fucking founder of TYT.
Yes, compared with the left post-Trump mainstream Cenk is a moderate.

They need to clean their shit up, or they will either destroy the US or get eradicated.
 
Oulun said:
So he thought abortion was bad, a belief shared by a majority of Americans and which got Trump in office? Do you retards even understand political science? Do you ever want to win another election?
Click to expand...
Are you retarded? There's a difference between not wanting whores using abortion as a means of birth control and subjecting a 10-year-old child to a biological process that her body is not ready for. That will physically and emotionally traumatize her, possibly kill her. After a pedophile raped her.

Kirk was a lot of things but "mild" and "not extremist" isn't one of them.
 
Last edited:
The issue of hypocrisy is less important to me than what it says about the state of civil society. I don't remember who said it, but it was once said that you can judge how civilized a society is by how humanely it treats those it deems to be reprehensible, and when looked through this lens, I think it's fair to say that the United States today falls very far short of this ideal, not just culturally, but institutionally.

As I see it, it doesn't matter who's grave you're dancing on, nor who's misfortune you're celebrating, the common denominator is cruelty. Why not be kind instead?

I'm unashamedly left-wing, but I am completely saddened by Kirk's death. His young life was robbed from him, and his loss is immeasurable, not just to him, but to his family. There is no excuse for violence like this.
 
Team TERF said:
Are you retarded? There's a difference between not wanting whores using abortion as a means of birth control and subjecting a 10-year-old child to a biological process that her body is not ready for. That will physically and emotionally traumatize her, possibly kill her. After a pedophile raped her.

Kirk was a lot of things but "mild" and "not extremist" isn't one of them.
Click to expand...
Shut the fuck up.
 
I think people who immediately jump to political violence, without considering every option first, have no theory of mind, no understanding of the intricacies of bureaucracy, or the process of implementing policy or change. Just no plan at all. And that's the problem. You act like Dylan Roof, go to a church, and a shoot a bunch of people praying. Then what? We get a race war? It's just fucking stupid.

The grave dancing doesn't bother me as much as the violence does because I can see it acting as a valve release to make people cope with their frustrations. I'd rather have that than just people dying for dumb shit that accomplishes nothing.
 
Divine right to rule said:
This is a fucking false equivalency from the beginning and faggots are trying to gaslight you, it is not even in the same universe.
The first two are tasteless, the third one is support of the dissolution of society through political violence.
Click to expand...
Case in point:

1757624625686.webp

I think someone would HAVE to spell out the difference. I think they know, they just don't care.
 
rapefugee said:
Charlie Kirk said the 1964 Civil Rights act was a mistake, and that gays should be stoned to death. These might be normal views for KF and /pol/, but they aren't mild for normies.
Ironically, he also said that kids should watch public executions, that empathy was a bad thing, and that gun deaths were worth it.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry he wanted you stoned to death, but you have to get out of your box and think in terms of realpolitik. Think about history and consider that maybe normies are closer to hating faggots than loving trannies like you.
 
rapefugee said:
Charlie Kirk said the 1964 Civil Rights act was a mistake, and that gays should be stoned to death. These might be normal views for KF and /pol/, but they aren't mild for normies.
Ironically, he also said that kids should watch public executions, that empathy was a bad thing, and that gun deaths were worth it.
Click to expand...
I love having to sort through 200 pages of political schizo babble about what someone said, instead of just linking to what they said. Or better yet, clip it here and embed. If you had to see an opinion that wasn't filtered through some mainstream media source, would you die?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom