Charlie Kirk shot and killed at Utah event, no arrest yet

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.

NEW DISCUSSION THREAD




article/archive

This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah on Wednesday.

Bystanders report seeing Kirk shot near his neck during a Q&A with students.

A suspect is in custody, according to a UVU alert sent to students. The campus is on lockdown.



Charlie Kirk has allegedly been shot in the neck during a Utah Valley University event. Retrieving links now.
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1965843808475820324
IMG_20250910_124732_275.webp
Confirmation he was at the event.

Multiple witnesses confirmed he was shot "in the neck".
https://x.com/HeyRonWilson/status/1965846857298628717
IMG_20250910_124854_979.webp
https://x.com/pdubdev/status/1965844906364252411
IMG_20250910_124857_953.webp

Video after shots were fired.



Up close videos of Charlie getting shot. Do not watch if sensitive. It is disturbing.




Video of Charlie being evacuated.

Multiple reports currently say Charlie Kirk made it to the hospital and is currently stable but the extent of his injuries and likelihood of recovery isn't currently known. He is in critical condition.

Charlie Kirk has been assassinated. Trump has confirmed he's dead.
https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1965878289198887177
IMG_20250910_144547_201.webp

The pictures of the detained boomer are not the shooter. The murderer is still at large.
https://x.com/TheInsiderPaper/status/1965868724608778639
Screenshot_20250910_153045_X.webp
Police scanner with possible description.
Here is the dispatch / scanner reporting of a possible shooter and his description.

Sorry I messed it up but here it is.

fgsdbsfgb.mp4

Kash Patel says suspect now in custody.
IMG_20250910_163301_032.webp

Released. Suspect still at large.
1757549191369.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not sure if this was said before, but why Charlie Kirk? If the assassin was aiming to silence the right and its voices, wouldn't it be better to go after someone more radical that just is starting to gain popularity. Not that Kirk and TPUSA had little reach, but it has been stagnating for the past years and especially in 2025. Wouldn't a target like Nick Fuentes be more logical? The only reasoning I can think of, is that there was some sort of beef with some of his donors. I do not believe a lot of people on the left are capable with such a plot and such a shot. But a foreign agency, like the Mossad, would be.

Playing devil's advocate here.
what would killing some lunatic extremist like nick fuentes achieve? that guy isn't convincing anyone to move right, he's not a threat to leftist political power. if anything, he actually helps them by being so grotesque and repulsive that he damages the overall reputation of the right and drives undecided voters away from them.


charlie kirk on the other hand was the type of moderate, respectable, reasonable, soft republican that had the ability to actually reach and convince undecided normies. this guys work was actually increasing the amount of people who support the right. that's what made him dangerous to the left.
 
They'll huff n puff and blow at a brick house for a week.
Then the conservatives will tire themselves out again and go back to sleep.
Such is the way of a conservative.

At any other time I would've agreed, but right now I'm not so sure. We've come to the end of a 60+ year era over the last few years. Things are shifting and realigning, and the left just brutally murdered the most milquetoast, "let's talk it out" figure that young right-of-center men knew, right in front of them.

I've no doubt you're right that the blowhards will go back to their slop cycle quickly enough, but something like this can change the tone of things a lot going forward.
 
Suddenly a guy who can't stand trannies works with them, and not only that, they converse with them
Hating a coworker but being civil with them to get through the day is a concept invented purely to whine about trannies, very astute of you.
 
What really baffles me is that thousands of people can just make videos/posts celebrating this and saying terrible things, with their full name, address, face, workplace and everything, and nothing ever happens to them. But if someone dares to tweet "black people be doing crime" suddenly they lose their career and everyone around them disowns them.

When will this stop? I'm just tired of the unfairness in treatment. Either it's okay or it's not, regardless of political sides.
 
Pretty much everybody here is too heated to be receptive to this but I'm going to say it anyway:

If you think a liberal civilian fired a single round at 200yds, got a clean killshot through the neck and made a clean getaway without being identified, you're getting worked. This is 100% an op. I don't know by who, I don't know why, but I guarantee it was done to incentivize some type of behavior from someone, and it might be you, so you should be mindful of what information you take at face value and how you react to it. This shit glows.

I don't fully agree with you, mate.

I'm not from the USA and my experience with guns is mostly limited to .22 air rifles, plinking at targets at the bottom of the garden.
However, I've been to the US, visited an outdoor range, fired a Winchester 7.62 and hit man-sized targets 800 feet away. It wasn't that hard. Did I hit the centre? Probably not. Heard the delayed bullet strike every single time.

I think a barely trained bastard could easily have aimed for the chest, missed, but managed to hit poor Charlie Kirk's neck. That seems totally realistic to me, from my limited experience with proper rifles.

Not saying your hypothesis is definitely wrong. I just believe that a total nobody could absolutely have taken that shot and hit somewhere on Kirk's body, and it happened to be fatal.

ETA: The same day, my wife consistently hit targets 110 yards away with an AR-15. She hates guns and had never fired anything in her life. I really don't think it would take special forces to make that shot.
Poor man. Poor family.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, true. But it's just the typical horseshit I see on here - like that "I was in a bar and couldn't help overhearing and so I..." bullshit stories to convey a bullshit story. These "trannies at work" commentary are all framed the same. Suddenly a guy who can't stand trannies works with them, and not only that, they converse with them, and they are always gleeful. I mean it is fucking formula storyboard. It is tiresome.
I don’t know why one would even mention speaking to a troon, usually those are the conversations you would want to memory hole.
 
Kash and Bondi are the worst pick ever a pajeet and a stupid whore
Bondi turning what should have been a straightforward deportation of an illegal into a multi-month embarrassing snafu that is still ongoing should have been an indicator of things to come. And the Epstein list that was most definitely on her desk.

Deporting Abrego-Garcia wouldn’t have been difficult had they just opened a new removal case against him, the stay would have been nullified. But they were too retarded and have been paying for that mistake by making more mistakes.
 
Not sure if this was said before, but why Charlie Kirk? If the assassin was aiming to silence the right and its voices, wouldn't it be better to go after someone more radical that just is starting to gain popularity. Not that Kirk and TPUSA had little reach, but it has been stagnating for the past years and especially in 2025. Wouldn't a target like Nick Fuentes be more logical? The only reasoning I can think of, is that there was some sort of beef with some of his donors. I do not believe a lot of people on the left are capable with such a plot and such a shot. But a foreign agency, like the Mossad, would be.

Playing devil's advocate here.
Deranged libs think JK Rowling is a literal neonazi. They were roughing up old church ladies for holding signs outside that spa that had a tranny exposing himself. He's moderate to us but to them a guy like Charlie Kirk is basically Hitler himself for the kinds of things he says.
 
ust going to post some Reddit smug and callous comments that I raged at earlier plus a comic.
1000046177.webp
" :smug: :smug: :smug: " What, freedom of speech and association? Wtf is wrong with these people?
George Zinn, arrested for obstruction after Charlie Kirk shooting, is widely known Utah political ‘gadfly’
The Salt Lake Tribune (archive.ph)
By Paighten Harkins and Sean P. Means
2025-09-11 01:07:04GMT

Zinn, 71, was detained on suspicion of obstruction of justice;
Let's hope he dies in jail. Trying to misdirect the police at the scene of a murder is a serious crime, we can't have that. This Boomer 'gadfly' belongs in a cage until he gracelessly expires.
 
To be fair, the reason someone who can't stand trannies could have a direct correlation to the fact that he works with them and is forced to converse with them as a product thereof.
I think those outside of tech seriously underestimate how many trannies actually work in this space. They're literally everywhere. My hatred for them directly stems from the first encounter I had with one at work years ago.

I don't get why the spastic you're replying to thinks it's so unusual that people on a site that is notoriously tranny critical has such a high volume of people who have first hand negative experiences with trannies.
 
I don't get why the spastic you're replying to thinks it's so unusual that people on a site that is notoriously tranny critical has such a high volume of people who have first hand negative experiences with trannies.
Because they'd have to confront the fact you know what you're talking about in regard to a specific experience and would rather attack you personally than do that.

I expect better from someone with an avatar from one of my personal heroes.
 
I don't fully agree with you, mate.

I'm not from the USA and my experience with guns is mostly limited to .22 air rifles, plinking at targets at the bottom of the garden.
However, I've been to the US, visited an outdoor range, fired a Winchester 7.62 and hit man-sized targets 800 feet away. It wasn't that hard. Did I hit the centre? Probably not. Heard the delayed bullet strike every single time.

I think a barely trained bastard could easily have aimed for the chest, missed, but managed to hit poor Charlie Kirk's neck. That seems totally realistic to me, from my limited experience with proper rifles.

Not saying your hypothesis is definitely wrong. I just believe that a total nobody could absolutely have taken that shot and hit somewhere on Kirk's body, and it happened to be fatal.
Tbf though you were in a controlled setting with no risk to yourself. Imagine trying to make that shot with adrenaline coursing through your body due to the pressure of the situation. With the idea that not only do you have to shoot this guy and down him in the first shot, but you also have to execute a getaway with hundreds of witness and several cameras and cops surrounding you. That is a lot of pressure. That kind of clarity of mind is not a common skill to have naturally. You typically have to train for it. Point being, it's not just the shot that matters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom