Charlie Kirk shot and killed at Utah event, no arrest yet

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.

NEW DISCUSSION THREAD




article/archive

This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

Charlie Kirk was shot at an event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah on Wednesday.

Bystanders report seeing Kirk shot near his neck during a Q&A with students.

A suspect is in custody, according to a UVU alert sent to students. The campus is on lockdown.



Charlie Kirk has allegedly been shot in the neck during a Utah Valley University event. Retrieving links now.
https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1965843808475820324
IMG_20250910_124732_275.webp
Confirmation he was at the event.

Multiple witnesses confirmed he was shot "in the neck".
https://x.com/HeyRonWilson/status/1965846857298628717
IMG_20250910_124854_979.webp
https://x.com/pdubdev/status/1965844906364252411
IMG_20250910_124857_953.webp

Video after shots were fired.



Up close videos of Charlie getting shot. Do not watch if sensitive. It is disturbing.




Video of Charlie being evacuated.

Multiple reports currently say Charlie Kirk made it to the hospital and is currently stable but the extent of his injuries and likelihood of recovery isn't currently known. He is in critical condition.

Charlie Kirk has been assassinated. Trump has confirmed he's dead.
https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/1965878289198887177
IMG_20250910_144547_201.webp

The pictures of the detained boomer are not the shooter. The murderer is still at large.
https://x.com/TheInsiderPaper/status/1965868724608778639
Screenshot_20250910_153045_X.webp
Police scanner with possible description.
Here is the dispatch / scanner reporting of a possible shooter and his description.

Sorry I messed it up but here it is.

fgsdbsfgb.mp4

Kash Patel says suspect now in custody.
IMG_20250910_163301_032.webp

Released. Suspect still at large.
1757549191369.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I see people saying "well the two minnesota lawmakers...paul pelosi's attack ... you didn't speak out then!" pretty sure both topics were well talked about at the time here and elsewhere and both of them were memoryholed very quickly by the MSM once the stories started to go the wrong direction.
My memory of discussion of those instances were all pretty much "dude what the fuck?!" no celebrating. Closest snark I remember was some people suggesting the guy that assaulted Paul Pelosi was actually a gay prostitute that he'd hired but was hopped up on meth.
 
Another roof sniper? Regardless of me agreeing or disagreeing / liking or not liking Kirk's actions and beliefs, that's quite an impressive shot if the distance and accuracy is to be believed. Israel confirmed I guess?
 
Political violence in any form is very scary and a sign that there are deep, deep flaws bubbling in a country. Liberal fucktards will be all righteous and quote Charlie's beliefs as a justification, MAGAts will whine about the left being violent despite their inability to be any better or admit firearms are an issue; at the end of the day, we're all the losers when people start dying over political debate.
I completely agree.

If this breaks the way it's looking, I guess it will be a consolation prize.
 
Since we don't know the motive of the shooter yet, he's the potential motives of who did it I've seen around
-Left wing democrat who hated how much influence and power he had/ feared he'd be president someday
-Right wing republican who hated Charlie for some esoteric reason or hated his Israel stance
-Groyper or some other far right extremist who hated him for not being as ideologically pure as their in group
-Israel or some doesmtic glowie org pulling some 4D chess move to distract from the Epstien stuff by giving the right a martyr
Am I missing any perspectives?
Generic crazy person, perhaps the least interesting of options.
 
It’s especially funny to see this from T&H people, who donate to a man that’s 1000x the shitlord chud Charlie Kirk would’ve ever been. Charlie cried over niggo abortions; Josh would nuke Africa, India and the Middle East without losing a second of sleep over it. Financially supporting an open admirer of Adolf Hitler so you can get special stickers is what a principled liberal does, I guess.
T&H are almost universally the worst posters here. Only ones who even come close are clueless newbies who post without understanding site culture.
 
We don't even need to argue that as speculation. It is a provable fact you can put on a map that the vast majority of gun violence occurs in the areas with the least legal gun ownership.

Well of course he did. He was U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and therefore was in charge of prosecution for basically the Mafia Capital of the whole country.
A lot of people fail to understand that with more policing you can lower gun crime drastically. Presence is a contributor but if you have the ability to investigate and recover things from house robberies, drug networks, etc. a whole lot of illegal gun crime goes down. Then it's just a matter of actually treating the mentally ill like they are mentally ill and not fragile troons and shit.
 
It's incredibly stupid how half of this thread is people moralfagging about leftists cheering at this, while they themselves would cheer if Hasan got jfk sniped instead, and how the other half is 2nd degree moralfagging by pointing this out and calling it hypocrisy. People in general like it when bad things happen to people they dislike, and dislike it when bad things happen to people they like, why is this such a hard concept? Are you gonna go up to a solider in a warzone and say "oh you don't want to get shot by the enemy? but you would shoot them? hypocrite much?" It's not hypocricy, it's just how things work. I''m not gonna clutch pearls at the leftsit reaction to this, it's only notable in how stupid it is as a strategic descision to gloat about killing somebody this lame and milquetoast. Ask yourself how you'd feel if some random leftist pundit got shot, honestly. My only geniuene emotional reaction would be in relation to how it'd potentially fuck up optics, but I really wouldn't care about the person themselves. If you're like that then don't be surprised leftists feel the same about Kirk, you can still dislike them for it, but it's not some epic own to point it out. If you're like that but do genienly care about Kirk it's not hypocricy either. You can have different reactions to people being hurt depending on how much you like them, that's normal.
Yeah ok Carl Schmitt
 
GBATemp is still around? That place was a beehive of niggas getting groomed and trans'ed hard ( staff will never admit it). Talked to quite a bit of them personally until I was deemed an "untouchable" (meaning you asked the question of why is everybody under 21 changing their gender to female?). One of the closer Sodom experiences on the internet.
 
I see people saying "well the two minnesota lawmakers...paul pelosi's attack ... you didn't speak out then!" pretty sure both topics were well talked about at the time here and elsewhere and both of them were memoryholed very quickly by the MSM once the stories started to go the wrong direction.
HA!

I just heard that come up IRL.

Yeah, they were widely talked about with the Minnesota lawmakers being another mystery box shooter situation from what I recall. Those two were Dems, but they also voted against giving migrants healthcare. Pretty sure the shooter worked under Walz for a bit and there was heavy back and forth about him being a carryover from the previous governor and how involved he was with the VP candidate. The main thing for Dems to latch onto was the shooters list which I believe included some pro-abortion subjects.

Fuck…It’s hard to keep track anymore as you have the media approved story and the Kiwi story which run different courses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom