US Trump DOJ Deliberates Over Gun Ban For Transgenders - The Justice Department is "actively considering a range of options to prevent mentally unstable individuals from committing acts of violence."

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
By Mary Margaret Olohan • Sep 4, 2025 DailyWire.com

1757013354501.webp
Getty Images

WASHINGTON — In the wake of the latest deadly attack on a school by a transgender-identifying individual, President Donald Trump’s Justice Department is considering blocking trans-identifying people from buying firearms, The Daily Wire has learned.

“Individuals within the DOJ are reviewing ways to ensure that mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to obtain firearms while they are unstable and unwell,” one source inside the Justice Department told the Daily Wire.

The DOJ’s discussions center on the fact that those who identify as transgender suffer from gender dysphoria, a mental disorder, the DOJ source familiar with the conversations shared with The Daily Wire. Gender dysphoria describes the sense of unease that a man or woman may feel if he or she thinks that their biological sex is mismatched with their so-called gender identity.

A DOJ spokesman would not comment on specific measures being considered, but said that a “range of options” are on the table.

“Under Attorney General Bondi’s leadership this Department of Justice is actively considering a range of options to prevent mentally unstable individuals from committing acts of violence, especially at schools,” the spokesman said.

Given the rise in transgender violence over the past decade, particularly aimed at school children, many on the right have argued that authorities should be taking a much closer look at the warning signs exhibited by transgender shooters.

Last week’s deadly shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church in Minneapolis, in which trans-identifying shooter Robin Westman killed two children and injured many more, has prompted calls from the right to investigate transgender domestic terrorism. The Daily Wire reported this week that the White House’s draft national security strategy on domestic terrorism will specifically address transgender violence.

1757013302233.webp
US Department of Justice (DOJ) headquarters building on January 20, 2024, in Washington, DC. (Photo by J. David Ake/Getty Images)

Westman’s actions came only two years after another trans-identifying killer, this one a woman who identified as a man, targeted Christian school children in Nashville. One week later, leaders of Catholic and independent schools in Minnesota had called on Governor Tim Walz to help prevent similar shootings, as The Daily Wire reported earlier this week.

They feared that the next shooter would target one of their schools, but the security funding was never authorized. That same year, Walz was working to protect transgenders, signing legislation establishing Minnesota as a “trans refuge,” and promising to “protect those seeking gender-affirming care.”

On Tuesday, Walz shared that he is talking to legislators about calling a special session to address gun violence, telling CBS News: “The things that make America unique in terms of shootings is we just have more guns and the wrong kinds of guns that are on the streets.”

The fact that the DOJ is considering blocking trans-identifying individuals from owning guns suggests that the Justice Department views the situation very differently. A review by The Daily Wire found that the Annunciation school shooting and the Covenant Christian school shooting are just two examples of a steady stream of transgender-related violence over the past decade.

“Democrats have called for common sense gun laws for a long time,” the DOJ official shared on Thursday, adding, “This seems pretty common sense to me.”

The move would undoubtedly infuriate those on the left who believe that men can become women and women can become men — and that people who identify as transgender are not mentally ill but merely living in the wrong body. These critics argue that transgender identification is irrelevant when discussing school shootings and that even discussing the topic puts trans-identifying people in danger and should be off limits.

In recent years, doctors, therapists, activists, and even President Joe Biden’s administration have argued that people experiencing gender dysphoria will benefit from so-called “gender-affirming care” — transgender surgeries, hormones, and puberty blockers — claiming that these gender dysphoric people are more likely to kill themselves if they don’t receive such “care.” Opponents of these measures, including young people who underwent the procedures as teenagers like Chloe Cole, argue that “gender-affirming care” does not mitigate the distress that gender dysphoric people have, but actually often exacerbates mental health issues.

Democrats like Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey have criticized “HATE being directed at our trans community” in the wake of last week’s shooting, claiming that “anybody who is using this as an opportunity to villainize our trans community or any other community out there, has lost their sense of common humanity.”

Sebastian Gorka, deputy assistant to President Donald Trump and senior director for counterterrorism, argued on CNN earlier this week that there was an ideological component to the Annunciation school shooting.

“What we should do is we should look at the early warning signals, the signs,” he told CNN’s Brianna Keilar. “We should be providing off-ramps, we should be providing mental health options for these individuals.”

“I find it hard to believe that an individual goes from getting his mother to sign a change of name certificate, age 17, and then just a handful of years later is mowing down innocent children in a church pew during a Catholic mass, and nobody realized there was a problem,” Gorka argued. “That is what we have to address to save the next children from the next atrocity. It’s not about the sexual proclivities of the individual, it’s the fact that nobody seems to notice a very disturbing pattern towards violence.”

Source (Archive)

1757013508560.webp
Source (Archive)
 
So what actually happens, based on every single ShitLib activist and Regime urinalist who tries to do a "gotcha" story about how easy it is to buy a Semi-Fully Automatic High Capacity Assault Kalashnikov-15, is that the gun store owner sees him coming from a mile a way and says, "No sale, faggot."

Or the 4473 trips them up because half have been diagnosed with something and the other half are criminals. But the larger point is that while no system is perfect, there are ways to filter out a large part of society's problems, or make it a bit harder to do something bad. A troon having to act like its actual sex for 15 minutes in front of a MAGA-chud gun shop clerk is a dealbreaker for nearly all of them.
One tranny figured it out.
1757033985467.webp
1757034015726.webp
 
what's more likely is that they'll start officially making not just troons but also otherwise abnormal people mental defectives, and they also won't repeal any gun control laws.
The first half of that is going to be hard to do, if we're going off of the 'targeting undesirables for THEIR side' rant.

What's important here is that there's valid criteria in existing gun laws with regards to mental illness -- a schizo can't buy a gun, for example -- and there's well established criteria regarding troons as being mentally ill.

What is a matter of legal argument is whether or not troons fall under the criteria under existing gun laws. An anorexic, for example, isn't going to be planning a shooting spree anytime soon (likely because they lack the caloric intake to do anything besides surf the web for thinspiration, but I digress) even though they are pretty damn close to the mentally unwell criteria that troons fit.

It's why I noted it is a good thing that troons = mentally unwell is getting into public discourse. They've tried reaaaaaaaaally hard to scrub any and all psychologically dangerous criteria for trooning in favor of being able to rubber stamp 'gender affirming care', and I'd love to see, as part of the ongoing pushback against these freaks, ongoing discussion of the dangerous behaviors that are comorbid with these freakshows and criminal behavior. We're sort of dancing around it right now with the troons in women's bathrooms arguments, but it's not outright being stated by the general populace.

The fact that a lot of the heckin valid and true behavior troons have been trying to normalize is clustered around aberrant and in some cases criminal behavior shouldn't be ignored and there should be exploration as to why serial killers like Dennis Rader also love dressing up in women's clothing. Or why there's a strong incel --> troon pipeline and how there's a lot of concerning anti-social behaviors (which leads to shit like school shootings.)

I am really hoping that the door gets kicked right open with the mountains of criminal psych evidence that overlaps with troon behaviors and why there are so many similar patterns to be found with dangerous criminal offenders and heckin valid and true troons and pooners.
 
This is a terrible idea. When TRAs go on about "transgender rights are human rights" I cringe and roll my eyes, but this shit is actually denying a constitutional right to people. Im not in the habit of turning my enemy into a actual victim.
As a lolbertarian-leaner, I agree. As anything within the Bill of Rights is considered a natural right that the government has no say over, I am against this.

However, I'm also not going to turn down the opportunity to laugh at trannies, so I went over to r/transguns. Nothing too funny yet, just panic.
 
I'm amazed how unaware americans are of their very own luck.

Freedom is a gift from god. Mental wellness is a gift from god.

You people don't know how censoring "anti propaganda" laws fuck your life up. You don't know what war is. You don't know how it feels to live in a country where police can easily kill you and nobody will blink an eye. You don't know how it feels to live in a country in which you can go to jail for 15 years for self defence from a killer or a rapist.

Living in a country where I can protect myself and say whatever I want is one of my biggest dreams. And it's really challenging to get there. And when I see people who already live there without any problems saying how much they love "based" eastern european holes for draconian laws it makes me seethe and dilate. Bitch, you have no idea what you ask for. And when you'll understand it it'll be too late. As soon as you get freedom you fuckers want more control.

So, schizobrothers, troonsisters and other American citizens alike - don't let the government grab you by the balls, whether your balls are male or female.

1757034255885.webp
 
No true pro 2A admin would even float this idea as it would set a clear precedent for future administrations to ban gun ownership for undesirable groups (i.e. "far-right", "anti-vaxxers", etc.) None of this is even logistically possible without an Orwellian police state and enormous privacy violations that would no doubt be used against conservatives if they become problematic in the future. All this gender war bullshit will likely be a footnote in the history books anyway. Potentially debasing the 2nd amendment over a bunch of terminally online retards who are dependent on hormones and SSRIs and will likely off themselves in the next decade seems like a terrible idea.
 
Banning our political enemies and violent trannies from owning guns is a good thing actually.
View attachment 7871140

So what's to stop the Democrats from using this as a template to enact gun restrictions in general?

And this is putting aside the fact that there is little chance the Supreme Court will sign off on this less they want to basically blow up their stretch of gun right rulings. Keep in mind that regularly in courts, you have to have been adjudicated as mentally defective in a court of law in order to have your gun rights restricted under 18 USC 922(g)(4) . This does not apply to mental illness at all, let alone transgenderism. And the kicker? Thanks to New York v. Bruen, it would likely be ruled unconstitutional even if it were to become policy because it would not be consistent with this Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation.

 
You know this would be more fun if things actually happened, but I think everyone in this thread, pro and anti, knows deep down that this shit ain't going anywhere kek

It's just a whole lotta hulabaloo for us to kvetch over and forget about when nothing comes of it, just like a million other things in politics.
 
You know this would be more fun if things actually happened, but I think everyone in this thread, pro and anti, knows deep down that this shit ain't going anywhere kek

It's just a whole lotta hulabaloo for us to kvetch over and forget about when nothing comes of it, just like a million other things in politics.
This literally this. Nothing is going to happen. It's all performative.
That is why I can easily not give a fuck about "Setting precedent" or banning anything; because nothing ever fucking happens. If we were to get serious-serious about this; sure maybe I'd allow some level of nuance, but until then; I could give a shit less who gets a gun.

How about this? I get all the guns. No cops get guns, no militaries get guns, no criminals get guns. I'll keep them all in my bathroom and closet. If you guys want a gun; you have to ask me for a gun, I'll give it to you on a pinkie-swear that you'll be a good guy.
 
Last edited:
>Let's shit on the 2nd amendment to own the libs!

You trumpfags really need to kill yourselves if you celebrate the erosion of rights.
 
>Let's shit on the 2nd amendment to own the libs!

You trumpfags really need to kill yourselves if you celebrate the erosion of rights.
Anyone who thinks this is creating or implementing new gun laws and not just recategorizing trannies as mentally ill so they can be barred under gun laws that are ALREADY enforced should get a threadban.

:bogged:
 
Awful idea, for reasons already stated here. It would set a horrific precedent for legal gun owners.

Oh, you took some Prozac for a few months 10 years ago? You don't pass the mental health check, so no guns for you.

Oh, you're a rape victim and you go to therapy for it? You don't pass the mental health check, so no guns for you.
 
I'm pretty sure me posting this will get me all sorts of alarm clock reacts, but as much as I like this because its always a great day when trannies are BTFO, what are the odds this would be used against right wing groups, or Republicans, or red states in general when Trump is inevitably out of office, one way or the other?

I say this because I know too well that its all fun and games to set a precedent until the other boot drops into power.
 
Why should Robert “Blaire” White be exempted? He’s mentally ill too. There’s nothing “based” about Bob - he’s a subversive trying (thankfully failing, but still trying) to get trannies accepted on the right wing.

Nah. He's a good dude.

I don't have a problem with transgender people. I have a problem with troons. There's a difference.
 
To be fair, trains are pretty sick
Yeah, but sadly all the autistic people have moved on to video games and messed up fetishes.
Stop shaming the Duke with your retardation. You're being almost as bad as the voice actor.
You wouldn't think that 2A types wouldn't really be interested in lining up to suck any politician's dick, because 2A is practically anti-government on its face. He even fucking said he wanted to take people's guns without due process.


Has anyone at least criticized him for this?
I should be allowed to play with hand grenades if I want. Machine guns are a given. Give me a tactical nuclear device for above my fireplace.
I'm completely on board with all of the above and see no possible down side.
All y’all faggots need to move to Europe.
If 2A is abolished, I'm leaving the country for sure.

Europe will probably be a caliphate by then though, so count me out.
I still think nothing is going to happen other than some very hilarious stances by the Democrats. Again, I'm cooking popcorn.

I feel Ike I'm at an Autism Speaks meeting where we need to fear the Autism. Nigga. Every day is a choice. I live with it. I have not chopped my dick off. Why? Because tranny shit is gay and abhorrent. It's clearly a sterilization program. Fuck that shit nigga. I'm not getting my Darwin Award that easy.

The autists that troon out are the weakest of the lot, who have no sense of self, who cannot learn from their mistakes or ever accept fault. There's a reason all these killers are 6'5" tall troons with rock hard jaws: lots of brawn, not much going on inside. They are low functioning dimwits.
Even if it is bait, it's probably not a good idea to give the grabbers ideas of their own. Popcorn sounds good though.

As an autist myself, I have failed as a man and will never get a girlfriend, but I adamantly refuse to become the girlfriend.
 
I agree with all the lolberts that guns should generally not be taken away from any demographic. Even people who are somewhat mentally unwell because having depression once should not end your right to self-defense in this violent world. This is the fastest way to get those on the Left to understand this concept as well. They have to call THEIR representatives and beg DEMOCRATS to defend gun rights. Fantastic.
 
Back
Top Bottom