US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nothing wrong with settling so long as you have a realistic perspective. People don't want to be alone, we were made for each other, not to simply live for ourselves. I know lots of people who hitched up because they're old and being old and alone is NOT fun. To my mind there's nothing wrong with this but lets not pretend that we're still young/naïve enough to think we're in a Disney fairy tail meeting our prince/princess. Evolutionarily we don't couple for 'love' but rather as a survival strategy first and foremost.

If you're lucky and good to each other, maybe the love can come later.
I don't think there's anything wrong with settling either, especially if there weren't many options to begin with.
I'm more so pointing out that Taylor Swift getting married at 35 is not the same as Taylor Swift getting married at 25, if that makes sense?

Like, at 25 she can have any man she wants and she has plenty of youthful years left, so deciding to settle down in that position would sort of a be a statement that it doesn't matter that there could be better, or that she's giving up on years of freedom.
Now to be fair, 35 y/o Taylor Swift might still technically be able to pull any man she wants because 35 isn't really old, and she is still attractive, for most people this isn't the case, and I'd argue that any man willing to be with 35 y/o Taylor would've preferred the 25 y/o version of her, even if they wouldn't admit it.
 
The purpose for the 600,000 chinamen is to keep the colleges afloat. They would collapse without the funding from all those students. (Unless I heard something wrong?)

I mean well if you ignore the fact that they started freaking out over the federal funding being cut because they are openly retarded.
Along with the fact that we are being extra harsh on those coming in this time around.

But no, clearly he's trying to keep them afloat.

Now, do ignore the tariffs that were just levied against China as well.
I mean he's definitely trying to save the colleges and China as well by these measurements right?

That's what was being said last night right?
 
Take the 'wealth inequality' issue that seems to be the number 1 issue for these people.

. . .

The world is unequivocally improving, but they, in their insulated little bubble, are simply too shortsighted to comprehend it.

They don't care if everyone in the world is better off materialy if some person is getting more wealthy than someone else. It doesn't matter to them one bit if ten million people are sitting on the dirt floors of their hovels eating some slop that couldn't even be sold in the US instead of dying of exposure and starvation if someone like Jeff Bezos grew ten million dollars richer at the same time.

Their envy on behalf of the poor is morally reprehensible and entirely hypocritical as they will never give freely of their own wealth, but will instead demand you be robbed to satisfy their desire to appear virtuous. If the world were more just they would all be deported some some other place where they could freely institute their grand design and starve to death.
 
One advantage of postpartum abortion coming to Canada is that it may provide more dead babies for Bill Gates to exploit:
View attachment 7835078

View attachment 7835081

In addition to the demented plutocrat Gates, the comparably repulsive United Nations is implicated:


Jon Fleetwood describes this as…
View attachment 7835099


No dystopian science fiction movie was ever as dark as our future if neoliberalism prevails.
Just come on out and say it man,
You're a little peckish, a little hungry, just say it man
 
For the past six hours, nearly every single ping on the Windows 11 news ticker is this bitch getting engaged. You'd think she was marrying Bill Gates with how Microsoft is deepthroating her.
1756252250264.webp
 
The purpose for the 600,000 chinamen is to keep the colleges afloat. They would collapse without the funding from all those students. (Unless I heard something wrong?)
Why would you assume Trump is bailing them out then, when he’s just continually putting them through financial hardship? And it’s not like they’re equivalent to the companies who got bailed out after 08, they don’t employ so many people that their bankruptcy will have effects on the entire economy.

I see no reason to assume that if the Fed pulls the funding they’re going to also bail them out, except for so many politicians being the products of the Ivies.
 
For the past six hours, nearly every single ping on the Windows 11 news ticker is this bitch getting engaged. You'd think she was marrying Bill Gates with how Microsoft is deepthroating her.
View attachment 7835264
I mean the girl that sings about all her break ups is finally settling down. It IS news. Spergs on KF don't care, normies do.
 
Righhhttt..

Lisa Cook said that she would not step down from the Federal Reserve, hours after President Trump said that he was taking the extraordinary step of removing her from the central bank’s Board of Governors.

Mr. Trump announced the firing, which he said was effective immediately, earlier on Monday. He cited allegations that Ms. Cook may have falsified records in order to obtain favorable terms on a mortgage, even though she has not been charged with wrongdoing or convicted of a crime.

In a statement released through her lawyer on Monday evening, Ms. Cook said that “no cause exists under the law” for Mr. Trump to fire her.

“I will not resign,” she said. “I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022.”
A leftist Shaniqua lifetime deep stater claiming to be above such petty concerns as "bosses" or "being fired for corruption?" It's also a day ending in Y.

Now she will find a leftist traffic court judge to agree the President doesn't have the authority to do anything if the people involved say no, the SCOTUS will kick that down, and Trump will gain even more power.
The President of the United States has commented on the Cracker Barrel rebrand:
View attachment 7833593
Source (Archive)
This being one hundred percent solid advice is somehow funnier than if he just flamed them.
This keeps going:

1756252290423.webp

1756252320494.webp
1756252295514.webp


1756252390375.webp
1756252402906.webp

He KNEW they were going to capitulate. Of COURSE they were going to capitulate. So he stepped in with polite business advice from a marketing legend and now gets to claim "he saved Cracker Barrel."

1756252441779.webp

1756252471360.webp

He's a fucking genius and the left are going to lose their shit over this. One of their brands one of their hive workers was about to "fix" is flinching and backpedaling and Trump gets to claim to be the one that did it with all the boomers.
 
Some reporting from CNN of all places:
"The Democratic brand right now has about the appeal with the American voter as the Cracker Barrel rebrand has with the American consumers. Bad bad bad... Republicans looking pretty darn good!'
Registration does not neccesarilty indicatate voting patterns.
He KNEW they were going to capitulate. Of COURSE they were going to capitulate. So he stepped in with polite business advice from a marketing legend and now gets to claim "he saved Cracker Barrel."
Trump is so petty jesus. But hey, that's politics now.
 
Back
Top Bottom