Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
Greer will now submit a notice everytime some troll emails him.

Though I guess I do appreciate Greer taking the burden of keeping this case on top of the court's inbox with this crap that I'm sure the magistrate loves to read.
He doesn't notice court orders, but he always seems to notice troll emails
 
Philosopher here again
Upon careful examination of the latest docket entry, I observe that Plaintiff Russell Greee has innovated a bold new jurisprudential category, I shall tentatively name it the supplemental authority of shitposts
In situations where most ordinary litigants would cite precedent and submit case law, Greee adduces vulgar emails from anonymous trolls (notwithstanding the possibility that Greee himself could be behind them) and offers Kiwi Farms taunts
From this observed pattern, I conclude that Greee is persistent in misidentifying the docket as his personal spam folder

If Greee were to keep it up and I had to draw reasonable inference from it, my cautious arithmetick is that, should Greee continue at this pace until the case is closed, the official record of Greee v. Moon will consist of 10% motions, 20% sanctions, and 70% screenshots of (fabricated or genuine) insults
 
So he claimed as a fact this guy is a kiwi farm's user and that him paying late wasn't a fact. Yet it is a fact that he paid late and he has no proof he is a kiwi farms user. And for some reason, the court needed to know about this.

Who was it that accused the other party of needlessly multiplying the proceedings in this case with pointless nitpicky filings? Oh, right. Dipshitforlips. But this is different, since as a pro se litigant, he must explaaaaaain.

And yes, there is zero proof that the email came from a KF user as opposed to literally any other troll on Ye Olde Internette who has followed his drama, or even that he didn't send it to himself. Love that he wasted pages to include a screenshot only of the partial subject line and not the body of the email itself.
 
A few observations:

"Satan's A****" doesn't have enough asterisks to represent "Satan's Asshole."

they are clearly a kiwi farms user because they reference the court filings.
I wasn't aware that we were the only people in the world with access to the court filings.

the paid sanction makes no sense. Regardless, it is paid
I love the bitter whining. I also love Russell's insistence that if he can just prove for real real that Kiwi Farms users are mean bad evil people, like REALLY REALLY MEAN BAD PEOPLE, the judge will side with him on these issues of law. The last 15 times he included a mean email from some random person it didn't accomplish anything, but, hey, that's no reason not to try it another dozen times.

I laughed out loud when I saw that screenshot.
 
LOL what do mean emails have to do with copyright? This is a copyright case, Shit-Lips, not a harassment case.
 
Serious question: Assuming the case does not get dismissed, because Barlow is demonstrably a faggot who will insist on letting the case proceed and slog through discovery to an imagined future trial. Assuming that, would there be any utility in Hardin responding to these "supplemental authority" filings Greer has sent in, to point out for the record that there's no proof any of these abusive emails came from any of the defendants (two of whom are anonymous KF users and one of which is an LLC)? I know how fond we all are of the "anything not raised is waived" doctrine in this thread, and I'm wondering if now would be the time to get ahead of it, instead of waiting for discovery to resume and evidence to be proffered. The judges are faggots after all, and probably believe uncritically that we are sending abusive emails.
 
I so desperately want the judge or someone to demand Greee show proof of where the emails were from (ie proper headers, information from his email provider as to the provenance of the emails etc). Otherwise, for all we know Russ could start putting photos of farm animals in his filings and claim they were from us*. Where’s the proof, Russ?

Can you literally put any old shit in your filings and claim they came from the other side?

* Or soft-core porn and Instagram screen shots.
 
Well, Russell, a few points:
  • Anyone can claim to be from Kiwi Farms. That doesn't mean they are.
  • This website gets thousands of guests per day. Some of them even read this very thread. How do you know it's not one of them?
  • Kiwi Farms has a very strict no-trolling rule, and anyone who violates it gets violated in turn laughed at. Even if it was a Kiwi, they'd never admit to it.
  • How do we know you're not sending these emails yourself to slander the Farms' good name?
  • Lastly, what the hell do your trolls' nasty emails have to do with your copyright case against Josh?
 
This supplemental notice also shows the type of people “criticizing” his works since Defendants insist on using fair use as a defense.

He can't come up with a rebuttal to fair use.

Well, Russell, a few points:
  • Anyone can claim to be from Kiwi Farms. That doesn't mean they are.
  • This website gets thousands of guests per day. Some of them even read this very thread. How do you know it's not one of them?
  • Kiwi Farms has a very strict no-trolling rule, and anyone who violates it gets violated in turn laughed at. Even if it was a Kiwi, they'd never admit to it.
  • How do we know you're not sending these emails yourself to slander the Farms' good name?
  • Lastly, what the hell do your trolls' nasty emails have to do with your copyright case against Josh?

i don't see the words "kiwi" or 'farms" in that screenshot. you shouldn't get sold past the close by greee and debate the issue.
 
There is no mention or picture of Hitler in that email, therefore proving it is not from Kiwi Farms users.

(For the record, I did not send that email, as I was busy producing a Hitler-related meme at the time, therefore proving I could not have sent Russ an email at the same time.)

Assuming that, would there be any utility in Hardin responding to these "supplemental authority" filings Greer has sent in, to point out for the record that there's no proof any of these abusive emails came from any of the defendants (two of whom are anonymous KF users and one of which is an LLC)? I know how fond we all are of the "anything not raised is waived" doctrine in this thread, and I'm wondering if now would be the time to get ahead of it, instead of waiting for discovery to resume and evidence to be proffered.
Without offering information or advice to Russ, I think there's a reason for Hardin to ignore these for now.
 
He doesn't notice court orders, but he always seems to notice troll emails
It probably doesn't matter but this is shit for a motion to strike completely irrelevant, scandalous material. There's no evidence Russ didn't just send himself this shit.
 
Well, Russell, a few points:
  • Anyone can claim to be from Kiwi Farms. That doesn't mean they are.
  • This website gets thousands of guests per day. Some of them even read this very thread. How do you know it's not one of them?
  • Kiwi Farms has a very strict no-trolling rule, and anyone who violates it gets violated in turn laughed at. Even if it was a Kiwi, they'd never admit to it.
  • How do we know you're not sending these emails yourself to slander the Farms' good name?
  • Lastly, what the hell do your trolls' nasty emails have to do with your copyright case against Josh?

And anyone with PACER can see the court filings. The fact that they are referencing the court filings is not proof or evidence those emails he's claiming to get are from a Kiwi. It's also important to note that Russhole has been known to fake evidence in the past. He genuinely could be sending those emails to himself to fake evidence.

And again, none of this has to do with copyright. Russ loves to bang on whenever His Royal Hardship mentions anything Russ feels is irrelevant to a copyright case, but he's more than happy to do so himself.
 
The fact that he files meaningless bullshit like this and his previous filing after Hardin's motion to revoke his electronic filing access... Too funny. There should be another zoom hearing.

I would argue that crap like this is good support for Rusty's electronic access being revoked.
 
Back
Top Bottom