Assuming that, would there be any utility in Hardin responding to these "supplemental authority" filings Greer has sent in, to point out for the record that there's no proof any of these abusive emails came from any of the defendants (two of whom are anonymous KF users and one of which is an LLC)? I know how fond we all are of the "anything not raised is waived" doctrine in this thread, and I'm wondering if now would be the time to get ahead of it, instead of waiting for discovery to resume and evidence to be proffered.