- Joined
- Feb 13, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do agree with the work force and the general state of economics and the job market being part of the problem. Good luck dismantling feminism or anything feminist adjacent though. I don't see it happening at all.Snipped
Even if I didn't play it as much, I still had fun memories in town of robloxia and driving people off the map as the worst taxi driver. All I want is a big spotlight to be put on Roblox which seems to be happening. I would be concerned about the amount of clones that could pop up like with what happened to Club Penguin and how those clones resulted in something nasty like CPO, and having NSFW servers in those. But something like Roblox should be much harder to clone as Club Penguin was flash.It's like putting down a family dog that used to be beloved because something in it suddenly changed, and it just nearly killed your child. Its not worth keeping something like that around if its actively putting your children's life in danger, even if you have fond memories. Please let this be the end of Roblox as a whole, nothing is worth keeping this site up if so many children are being endangered on a daily basis.
And nosediving it appears to be as it's lost over 12 billion dollars in market value since August 6th.They're living on borrowed time, the company is overvalued as it is, and all its going to take is one big mess after another to send the stock prices into a nosedive.
Voting never matters but money does and it has more power.The US will use this as the opening for a similar UK censorship bill![]()
I will second this with my own anecdote.While yes, parents should be more engaged, the liability is squarely on the company offering a children experience.
Its like saying "wow, the kid drowned in the pool at the kindergarten? The parents should have paid more attention!"
This just leads to those fucking annoying ID verification laws that are happening right now. Parents need to have consequences for letting their children access the Internet unfettered instead. If a parent neglects their child and allows them to do drugs or drink or abuses the kid, they lose their parental rights. Same shit should happen for neglecting to keep the kids in some sort of safeguard online.What is needed is a law that requires special compliance parameters for companies making digital products for children, including direct personal liability for the leadership of the company. Right now companies can just claim "game for kids" and nobody actually checks if that is true.
You are a literal fucking retard dooming about nothing.This just leads to those fucking annoying ID verification laws that are happening right now. Parents need to have consequences for letting their children access the Internet unfettered instead. If a parent neglects their child and allows them to do drugs or drink or abuses the kid, they lose their parental rights. Same shit should happen for neglecting to keep the kids in some sort of safeguard online.
The fact that parents aren't parenting and haven't for a decade is the literal reason these ID laws are happening, my guy. Because the parents aren't do their jobs and cannot be held accountable the platforms need to do this to avoid liability. Just harvest everyone's ID in the name of safety. Fucking 1984 shit.You are a literal fucking retard dooming about nothing.
You cannot even logically explain how my argument that companies and the people working there have to be held liable for failures to protect children would lead to ID laws.
Hey Roblox, show me on the stock market where the pedos you're protecting touched you.
to further this comparison.Point being the park offered a safe environment for everyone to enjoy,
You replied to my post in which I pitched the idea of harsher laws and penalties for companies and the people responsible at those companies if they create a product for children and fail to keep children safe.The fact that parents aren't parenting and haven't for a decade is the literal reason these ID laws are happening, my guy. Because the parents aren't do their jobs and cannot be held accountable the platforms need to do this to avoid liability. Just harvest everyone's ID in the name of safety. Fucking 1984 shit.
You honestly believe that the lack of consequences for parents who don't parent and leave their children to parent themselves on the Internet has absolutely nothing to do with the state intervening? I can't even imagine being this naive.You replied to my post in which I pitched the idea of harsher laws and penalties for companies and the people responsible at those companies if they create a product for children and fail to keep children safe.
The content of your reply had nothing to do with what I said, you did not explain your reasoning or by what logic ID laws would even come into play regarding what I suggested should happen.
My idea does not require any form of ID verification at all, and simply forces companies to comply with existing law and protect children, instead of sacrificing them on the altar of profits.
Not only do you fail to actually reply to the post you quote, you fail to establish a logical explanation for your baseless claim or contribute to the discussion in a productive manner. Fuck off.
"The problem isn't that this company has been openly protecting repeat-offending pedophiles grooming children on their website, that they acknowledge themselvesBecause the parents aren't do their jobs and cannot be held accountable the platforms need to do this to avoid liability. Just harvest everyone's ID in the name of safety. Fucking 1984 shit.
I have no idea how you're getting this from what I wrote."The problem isn't that this company has been openly protecting repeat-offending pedophiles grooming children on their website, that they acknowledge themselves
But instead the parents for rightfully going after these pedophiles and the company that actively protects them"
Bold strategy Cotton
You're complaining about Digital IDs when this has nothing to do with the ID problem.I have no idea how you're getting this from what I wrote.
No, I'm not. I'm saying that companies being liable for the shit on the platforms is how you get the ID laws. Pedophiles can also be awful pieces of shit and should be expelled. You are trying to act like me asking a parent to parent is sympathies with pedophiles which I have to assume is bad faith.You're complaining about Digital IDs when this has nothing to do with the ID problem.
People are rightfully pissed off at the company that has openly declared their game a pedophile sanctuary.
You are protecting the company.
"I am not defending the pedo company, but if you go after the pedo company you will end up with ID laws, so don't do it!!!!11"No, I'm not. I'm saying that companies being liable for the shit on the platforms is how you get the ID laws. Pedophiles can also be awful pieces of shit and should be expelled. You are trying to act like me asking a parent to parent is sympathies with pedophiles which I have to assume is bad faith.