- Joined
- Jul 18, 2025
It’s an obvious misrepresentation of the argument people are making about Angel Dust’s sexual abuse. People are criticizing how it was done, not that it was done in the first place. Vivzie and her guntguarders don’t know how to counter the critics so they have to rely on strawmanning.Look the top person is right but it depends ON HOW you fucking write it you daft cunt. Take Lolita by Vladmir Nolvov for example. The story is written to demonize what Humpert does. And it's written pretty well. Compared to Lorchos Stolkholm which is just plainly disgusting fetishization of children.
Viv's writing comes off as immature and even extremely uncouth. I don't like the shit you listed but I'm free to call out the terrible romanticizing of pedophile junk rats that should be casterated and sent to brazil. Or some seanigger country.
Of course, this is coming from the same fandom whose creator drew beastiality shotacon and defended sexual predators in her company while comparing critics to people who likes cat snuff. You cannot make this shit up.
Sometimes I wonder how these retards think that being openly degenerates without showing actual trauma and development is considered good writing, if Viv had her way, she'd probably make Angel Dust a child sexual assault victim and fuck it up somehow.![]()
These niggers are straight up lying. They might see more hate against Vivzie, sure, because they are fans of Hazbin Hotel and Helluva Boss rather than Harry Potter. However, it should be extremely obvious if you’re not retarded that J.K. Rowling has received far more hate than Vivziepop can ever dream of getting.
Even if Rowling and Stonetoss were actually committing mass genocide right now, it doesn’t mean you can’t criticize Vivziepop; claiming so is like being in a shitty cramped apartment but pretending your living conditions are good because you’re not homeless. Clear instance of the defenders grasping at straws.