Disaster Candace Owens Sued By President and First Lady of France - Turns out defaming the first lady of France might be a bad idea

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron, the President and First Lady of France, are suing the far-right podcast host Candace Owens for defamation, among other claims.

For over a year, Owens, without presenting credible evidence, has been alleging that Mrs. Macron was born a man, along with a raft of salacious allegations, which include but are not limited to the Macrons engaging in or being part of a conspiracy involving identity theft, fraud, and murder.

It is an extraordinary, unprecedented step for a head of state to take against a citizen of another country, but Mrs. Macron has told friends that these allegations, which have been spread across the globe, have traumatized her, two sources close to the Macrons told me.

The Macrons are represented by the defamation law firm of Clare Locke, which has a history of representing conservative media figures.

Owens has dedicated a great deal of time over the past year and a half spreading the conspiracies about the Macrons, including the airing of a YouTube series with the salacious claims.

Over the past three years, Owens, who has a long history of disseminating transphobic rhetoric, has increasingly fallen into a pit of antisemitism.

She has used her platform (she has millions of subscribers on YouTube alone) to spread some of the oldest and often debunked conspiracy theories about Jews and Jewish power, including dangerous conspiracies about Jews and Israelis being responsible for 9/11 and the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

Owens’s rhetoric is often pulled straight from that of Neo-Nazis, although she softens it for YouTube so that she does not get demonetized or have her distribution limited.

Gwjf-IKaIAAo36w.webp

________

Hope this schizo nigger finally gets hit hard with reality
 

Attachments

Suppose Michelle Obama and Brigitte Macron got DNA tests and published results showing they were female. How many of the true believers would accept those tests as anything but Photoshopped fake news?
It worked for Obama's birth certificate though. The schizos were left by themselves while they whined it was a forgery.
 
makes sense
as frogs they should be surrendering , not killing and frauding
so you can see why it's a claim they'd fight
Kek. But seriously. They'll sell it with "you called my wife a tranny" to the public, when it's really about more serious, but boring, bullshit
 
Why would they sue her for offering such a wonderful compliment? Or do they think trans women aren't stunning and brave and joyous and cute and beautiful and women?
Suppose Michelle Obama and Brigitte Macron got DNA tests and published results showing they were female. How many of the true believers would accept those tests as anything but Photoshopped fake news?
People still think Obama never showed a birth certificate and that Trump never showed his income tax forms - because all presented ones didn't back up the conspiracists preconceived notions of what was in them.

You can't win against conspiracists because their ideas aren't born of facts and thus can't be dispelled with them.
It worked for Obama's birth certificate though. The schizos were left by themselves while they whined it was a forgery.
I would never trust any documentation presented by people that rich and powerful. They can fake anything and make anything go away.
You want me to believe Michelle is not a tranny, she'd have to stand naked, spread eagle, in a public plaza for at least a whole day so people can freely examine and document her snatch independently.

I don't want to see it but it's what it'd take.
 
Last edited:
1- France has no "first lady". Jean-Michel aka Brigitte is just an ordinary citizen. The fact that they use the presidency and the administrations to help her is already corruption.
2- if you follow the most serious guy who has investigated Brigitte aka jean-michel's past (Xavier poussard) he has noticed a list of weird things that proved that there is something hidden. No direct smoking gun, but a lot of really strange things or coincidences.
3- my opinion is that Brigitte is a man who was active in the 70's in the underground trans scene. Maybe under the name "Véronique". And he was a friend of a priest who was murdered by police after he threatened to blackmail people in power.
4- man or woman, "Brigitte" was an adult when she groomed a 15 years old macron, and that's a crime she can be prosecuted for until december 2025, but no french judge want to ruin its career or be suicided out of the blue.
5- right now many whistleblowers in France have been found dead, no reasons for their "suicides". Especially people who worked on the Alstom scandal involving macron.
6- in a funny way, Algeria has confirmed that nobody under the name Brigitte was studying in alger in 1963. Just a guy named jean-michel...
 
What idiot is representing the Macrons in American court? I don't care one way or another about the podcaster but.... these are definitely public figures, and it is nearly impossible for a public figure, especially a political figure, to win a defamation lawsuit under American law.
Billable hours are billable hours man. Unless you work on commission like a dope
 
She's a French groomer who seduced a student and somehow Owens had to make up that she's a tranny. It's stupid.
Candace Owens is fucking stupid so that checks out. I just told my brother about this lawsuit and his response was "She could have just called her creepy and they'd have no lawsuit." It would be hilarious though if Owen's defense gets mama Macron to take a DNA test to prove she's not a tranny.
 
I think Trump gave Macron idea to sue her. It's a move straight from his playbook, and he already asked Candace to shut the fuck up.
 
How can two french citizens sue an american on the ground of speech?
 
The fact that the journos point out she's transphobic and antisemetic tell me they're running defense so it must all be true.

Journos never mention the transphobia or antisemitism of the blacks and browns who do terrorism for the left, it's 100% reliable
 
How can two french citizens sue an american on the ground of speech?
Defamation is a tort. And the US courts, both state and federal, are open to pretty much any plaintiff. The alternative would be requiring that foreigners who have grievances against US citizens file suit in their home country, which would be far worse for Americans.
Instead of a jury of 6-12 TRVE and HONEST PVTRIOTS asking "why the fuck is this limey frog tranny here suing an American, they should go back to africa or whatever?" you'd be forced to fly over to France where some frog judge would go "HON HON HON Ve do not like filthy Americans and love Trannies, to jail with you," or however the frog legs are fried.
 
219 pages in a complaint means Candace Owens is going to be out a ton of money just having a lawyer read and analyse the complaint, before even responding. They issued her a demand for retraction and her response was to double down and create a multi-episode series about how she’s a tranny, there’s incest going on, she’s a rapist, and they’re part of a Jewish conspiracy. And it’s in a Delaware state court which is very likely unfavorable to Owens from the outset.

She’s fucked, in my humble opinion.
 
219 pages in a complaint means Candace Owens is going to be out a ton of money just having a lawyer read and analyse the complaint, before even responding. They issued her a demand for retraction and her response was to double down and create a multi-episode series about how she’s a tranny, there’s incest going on, she’s a rapist, and they’re part of a Jewish conspiracy. And it’s in a Delaware state court which is very likely unfavorable to Owens from the outset.

She’s fucked, in my humble opinion.
She and her husband are both rich. they'll be fine.
 
And it’s in a Delaware state court which is very likely unfavorable to Owens from the outset.
Eh, she'll absolutely remove on diversity grounds.
I'm inclined to think she'll win since I don't quite think she's gotten to recklessness under Sullivan, but it may have to go to a jury to decide that, which will be costly.

This is why you don't host a podcast as a crazy schizo, Children.
 
People still think Obama never showed a birth certificate and that Trump never showed his income tax forms - because all presented ones didn't back up the conspiracists preconceived notions of what was in them.

You can't win against conspiracists because their ideas aren't born of facts and thus can't be dispelled with them.
Conspiracies only persist because people dismiss them, and theres something there. In actuality transparency is easy as hell. The easiest way to dispel a conspiracy is bombard people with the truth.

Suing people doesn't prove anything.
 
Way I see it, it ends in one of two ways:
-A tranny pedo from the upper echelons of world politics gets unmasked publicly.
-Candace Owens, grifter who tried to create a child-doxing website and only pivoted to the right because the SJWs didn't let her cut into their territory, is ruined by the lawsuit.

Win win.
 
Back
Top Bottom