2025 Jeffrey Epstein Files

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So what's the catch, the real stuff in the files was never submitted to a Grand Jury? The list of names?
 
If this card does exist, that's definitely not good for Trump. So...they didn't publish photos of the genuine article because?
 
A Deer In Headlights said:
I'm imagining this how Trump is reacting right now
NOW.webm
Click to expand...
I just imagine Trump walking into the head of the FCC office acting like this. "CUT DOWN THE INTERNET NOW NOW NOWWWWWW!!!"
fsdfsd.webp
"Yes Mr. President!"
 
Lonjil said:
How many times are they going to flip flop on this. Does anyone genuinely believe these files will ever be released?
Click to expand...
At this point I'm completely convinced that whatever is released will either be tampered with or purposefully incomplete. With how deep Epstein infiltrated high society, releasing the full evidence would effectively decimate the political and business classes of America, especially if it implicates Trump. If they give us some bullshit list with a few sacrificial lambs on it, I'll be livid.
 
There's probably no simple list to release. Why would there be? It's a massive net of corruption involving hundreds of people with varying levels of guilt and involvement.

We all know who flew to Epstein's diddle island from past records released. That's why they can flip flop on it so much. The names are out there, everyone is just working together to muddy the water while using it as a political talking point when convenient.

Trumps going nuclear on this particular story because it's another strike against the idea that he was just a distant friend and not a frequent diddle island visitor.
 
Return of the Freaker said:
If this card does exist, that's definitely not good for Trump. So...they didn't publish photos of the genuine article because?
Click to expand...
Does anyone remember Roy Moore? The Senate canidate that lost because of accusations with cards and stuff?
Look at how this article is written, and everything in it, even a video.

And they don't even have a picture? What the fuck is this?
 
thebigdream said:
With how deep Epstein infiltrated high society, releasing the full evidence would effectively decimate the political and business classes of America
Click to expand...
It really makes you wonder if every political side is against releasing this, the rot must be exceptionally deep
 
Frankoid said:
There's probably no simple list to release
Click to expand...
Doesn't mean that no one investigating Epstein didn't create a list of implicated individuals. It seems suspect that people who are privy to the evidence have spoken about there being a list. Pam Bondi even spoke about it 'being on her desk', which would be very odd to say if there isn't one. Wouldn't it be an easy win for them to say 'there is no list for us to release, sorry!'
 
BibiLivesMatter said:
This should've been done from the beginning, instead of calling it a democrap hoax! :story:
I don't believe the Wallstreet article, but Trump and AG Bondi have done such a terrible job handling the Epstein stuff that it could've easily prevented all this drama. Like all of this drama could've been prevented with such ease, even if they just drip fed shit about Epstein.

Shouldn't have flip flopped on the topic saying it's real/not real and cashing ones check too early saying a "list" is on their desk ready to be signed for release.
Click to expand...
I dunno, when the POTUS and former presidents and royalty are all involved it's not easy. After the influencer bullshit scam with Pobosiac and others this is a lot for MAGA folks to handle. It's not a left/right issue. It's the 1% getting away with shit deal and Trump is in that 1%.
 
thebigdream said:
With how deep Epstein infiltrated high society, releasing the full evidence would effectively decimate the political and business classes of America
Click to expand...
it's going to end up being like 50-100 men, most of them obscure financial types no one has ever heard of

idk where people got the idea that epstein was some kind of monopoly in the hookers for rich dudes and politicians industry. there are literally hundreds of escort services and less savory types who work in the high-end retail portion of that market. he's suspected of pimping out 1,000 girls and young women - the real number is certainly more but not much much more - over 2 decades, that's a drop in the bucket even at the high-end
 
Pennypacker said:
The list of names?
Click to expand...
I don't think there's a "list" in the sense that this entire collective Epstein had been organizing "events" for are completely bipartisan in nature and there was likely a lot of conversations behind closed doors effectively agreeing to decentralize any details on congregations and prevent as many people from being simultaneously outed as possible. If you're one of the names named, you go under the bus to protect the rest unless you want to also die. Epstein got killed (or at least unpersoned) so he wouldn't name names, Maxwell took the hint and has been concisely shutting the fuck up beyond what she's permitted to say.

Is this the most boring and gay answer? Yes, because this world is ultimately incredibly boring and gay.
 
draggs said:
it's going to end up being like 50-100 men, most of them obscure financial types no one has ever heard of

idk where people got the idea that epstein was some kind of monopoly in the hookers for rich dudes and politicians industry. there are literally hundreds of escort services and less savory types who work in the high-end retail portion of that market. he's suspected of pimping out 1,000 girls and young women - the real number is certainly more but not much much more - over 2 decades, that's a drop in the bucket even at the high-end
Click to expand...
the diddy list would be more likely to have names most people would recognize than epstein's particular list imo. he was a finance guy on the surface, so a lot of his clients were extremely wealthy businessmen, the odd name people recognize here and there at the normie level is unique in comparison to the likely majority of epstein's clients I.E. finance people whose names are attached to those gargantuan holdings companies and investment firms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom