Is this some jank-ass decompilation or actual source code? What is this?
he does realize that if the goal was just to call kony a bitch ass nigger like we do pirate then most of what people mocked that movement for wouldnt have been said right? or if they actually just went there and hanged the fucking nigger then people would just say based right? that hes comparing himself to a child molesting pedophile warlord and insinuating that honkeys be bullying him and kony right?
Holy shit, I've never done anything with Game Maker, but after a few Google Searchers the function definition syntax seems to be the same. I refuse to believe that even this furry is this retarded.
Because as long as it remains in an unfinished state, he can cope about it being "great when it's done", once you release it and let it go off, people will start to judge it, start to make videos saying "it took him 9 years to make THIS?", etc. In addition, what will he stream, and what will he receive money for, once he releases the game? It's literally the same trap yandere fell into. It is much more profitable and ego-affirming for him to never finish it. He probably doesn't realize this consciously.
I really think the only surefire loophole free way for stop killing games to work (and this is turbo-based and make Mald cry but unfortunately will never happen) would be to mandate every online game allow for community servers even while the official ones are still running. Otherwise even if there is some mandate the devs release the final patch of the game to the public who knows how much content got ship-of-Theseus out'd over time for some of these decade+ running games, and that is before the possibility of the devs in bad faith making the game worse in the final patches
dead ferrets?
What gets me the most is the for loop being hardcoded to go from 0 to 1,000 rather than just using the length of the array. I don't even know what that'd do. I'd imagine in C it'd seg fault but maybe the GML compiler is smart enough to just stop at the end of the array?
It's actually fucking real... And he brags about it... His idea of "easy to understand" is hundreds and hundreds of assignment statements to all the values inside an array with some half-assed comment on the side explaining which integer value does what supposedly.
Maybe you didn't graduate from Computer Science Hogwarts, but it's digitally impossible to document or tell your community what each entry in your retarded array is if each member hasn't been separately initialized in your source code. If you put this into a loop, it's possible that a future version of Gamemaker will optimize the loop and change the order of operations, meaning you're not going to be sure which of the zeroes in this array is which by the time you exit the loop. Insane undefined behavior.
BRO YOU PUT THAT SHIT IN A COMMENT BLOCK OR IN A SEPARATE DOCUMENTATION FILE. THERES NO NEED TO REDECLARE EVERYTHING LMAO
Of course people should push for IP reform, show me where to sign.
You should post the properly EQ'd audio
This is interesting, because, like, I can see the logical throughline there, but if I were in his position, I'd probably still insist on trying to make something more beautiful and scalable, maybe something that checks the actual 2D space in the cardinal direction selected from the center or origin point of the selected button, breaking exact ties with preference to the higher index of those selected, etc, if for nothing else but because I like coding. If you resent what you do, that resentment will bleed into the work you produce, and here's a great example.
Holy shit, I looked at his "coding" in that video, besides this huge array stuff. He just has shit like
if (options_state == 0)
All I can figure is that maybe Game Maker is forgiving enough that he can get away with initializing the array-to-be as an int of some sort, and also that it's so idiot proof that any time you try and assign a value to an index that exceeds the array size it automatically appends?What gets me the most is the for loop being hardcoded to go from 0 to 1,000 rather than just using the length of the array. I don't even know what that'd do. I'd imagine in C it'd seg fault but maybe the GML compiler is smart enough to just stop at the end of the array?
I'm also not sure what global.storyline_array = 0 is supposed to do. Is that an attempt to set every index of the array to 0? I'm a bit rusty but I believe the "name" of an array is just a pointer so setting it to zero should just clobber your pointer in any language that doesn't have training wheels on it. I'm tempted to try compiling this in C just to see how many compilation errors I'd get
