💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

Where's the lie?

Gabe's "research" could have amounted to a post here. He managed to stretch that out over a 5 hour smug fest where he talked mostly about himself and got frustrated at trying to 'tard wrangle Keanu.

She is an idiot, but Gabe should have realized that and went to a competent streamers show.

It falls on Gabe for not picking a better host and not realizing that the audience is aware of most shit, but I blame Keanu for not really preparing either. @Friend of Dorothy Parker mentioned her being open or adaptable and honestly to use a vulgar term, Keanu was a dead fish when she wasn’t interrupting shit. Camelot and Xia are clowns and she can’t just say “it’s fucking gross that Nick and Camelot are putting Xia in a position where she’s saying she’ll masturbate to extremely creepy, pedoshit hentai”. That’s the proper response when you want to avoid calling one friend out. Instead she waffles and Gabe got pissed.

I think Gabe expected her to have some knowledge of who Rekieta is and her knowledge was “narcissist, LawTuber who did drugs while in a polycule with her former friend”. It forced him to explain more basic background than he needed to and he was already doing that.

I think he was pissed because she didn’t give him feed back before the show. She did not put out the Green M&Ms and like an idiot he went out on stage. He brought her numbers and money and she couldn’t even read off questions properly. He was high on his own supply, but I can see why he brought some stuff up.

The Sophie Long case he got emotional and as I understand it, it’s still not clear cut and the step-Dad has some allegations still floating. Gabe was right that Nick acted like a fucking retard about it though and probably should have been disciplined. As a lawyer he did something retarded.

The bigger thing Gabe could have brought up is how anytime Rekieta is wrong about something, he punts it and ignores it. Vic and number of shit he covered and advocated for are ignored by the time the next big thing comes up. That’s typical of any creator, but Nick tends to involve himself. He’s often never just a commentator and fundraiser. In both the Long case and Vic case he involved himself and ultimately caused harm.

Edit: @Dr Naomi Hunter I feel like Keanu had nothing to add or even attempted to really contribute to the conversation. Gabe was controlling, but she kept fucking up.

 

[PixarsTedKennedy]

Gabe shows her audio of ralph threatening to kill his wife and the next day she's trying to make nice with him

She's pretty vile. Every single person in the dabbleverse is just disgusting and I'm still unsure as to why I'm supposed to hate Stuttering John. He's a retarded liberal who drinks all day but at least he's not a pedophile.

 

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

It constantly amazes me that a man with such a poor grasp of female anatomy had 5 children. I know he's attempting to be humorous here, but female ejaculate ('cum') is distinct from squirt fluid. Ejaculate contains next to no urine. The joke doesn't make sense.

Maybe he should order female ejaculate off the Denny's menu next time he's there.

Well, he is the guy who was *proud* of making a woman bleed during sex because she was so dry.

 

[demicolon]

TL;DR - Nick Rekieta is almost nine-times more retarded than the UK and I can prove it with graphs.

Nick Rekieta - more gay than the uuu kay.

 

[Fag Albert]

She's pretty vile. Every single person in the dabbleverse is just disgusting and I'm still unsure as to why I'm supposed to hate Stuttering John. He's a retarded liberal who drinks all day but at least he's not a pedophile.

It's probably just a wings/DSP situation. But just in general from my time lurking around forums and such. a lot of the people that were fans of/involved in this whole 90's-early 2000's shock jock craze are some spiteful motherfuckers

 

[daffodils]

From yesterday's stream.


Nick talks about the secrets of Youtube success (it's the wine moms).

 

[Hitlerswag420]

What stake does the government have in fighting this? I don't understand. They arrested Nick and charged and convicted him, but he has enough pull with them that they won't release body cam of his arrest?

 

[Vect]

Nick talks about the secrets of Youtube success (it's the wine moms).

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

"When I was using."


"This is fine."

 

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

What stake does the government have in fighting this? I don't understand. They arrested Nick and charged and convicted him, but he has enough pull with them that they won't release body cam of his arrest?

It was probably part of his plea deal that the bodycam would not be released.

 

[ZipDisk]

I tire of plea bargains. Nail scumbags to the wall.

Take the kandyass out of kandayoshi.

 

[ParisOfTroy]

One thing that I appreciate that Gabe emphasized (that many still don’t get) is that Rekieta was never an experienced attorney, and he had no business giving out legal advice or legal opinions (either back during the genesis of Lawtube or during his trial streams now).

He graduated law school at age 33 (in 2015) and passed the bar exam during the same year. I have no compunctions for late bloomers or career changes in one’s 30’s (especially for a pivot that requires the courage to undertake the significant time investment of education and licensing), but he seems to have immediately gone into solo general practice after passing the bar. He then only took on a low volume of legal work for 2 - 3 years, before he felt comfortable LARPing as Alan Dershowitz on YouTube. Now, for a profession that is apprenticeship-oriented and relies SO much on courtroom procedure, accumulated legal knowledge, crystallized intellect, and experiential wisdom in general (derived from ACTUALLY PRACTICING LAW rather than listening to a professor’s lecture in law school), it seems dishonest to present yourself as an informed legal voice to the public, when you don’t have the background or experience to actually provide informed legal advice.

He’s not the only person to do this (many congressmen have touted their law degrees and legal knowledge, even though they never practiced more than a year or two), but it is just sort of shocking that so many people fell for this initial grift of him as an informed legal expert (when it was obvious that he was not from a cursory glance at his LinkedIn profile).

This is also why I shake my head when people tell him to “just do his legal analysis” or “put his head down and practice law”, like those are actually realistic options. The YouTube market is now saturated with channels with ACTUALLY EXPERIENCED attorneys (that would make Rekieta’s analysis look entry-level in comparison) and there is no way he will be retained as a private attorney, given his limited practice and his recent criminal history. If anything, he needs to lean into this gonzo “shock jock” entertainment domain of online Lawtube (where the lack of respectability serves a barrier of entry to all of his potential competition - respectable lawyers), provided he can keep within the limits of his probation. I just don’t see his former career of PG-13 legal analysis being a potential avenue for him anymore (unless he finds some improbable way to clean up, repair his burnt Lawtube bridges, genuinely apologize to the public, and use his platform to serve as a talk-show host for other legal influencers).

I have a feeling that he will start to lean into Innocence Project type work (where they are likely more accepting of criminal backgrounds), and try to mine clout from the legions of true crime housewives online. It would probably be his best chance of regaining online success.

 

[SterilizedGlowsticks]

I tire of plea bargains. Nail scumbags to the wall.

Take the kandyass out of kandayoshi.

Agreed, I hate them. It allows the guilty to get away with a lighter punishment, and pressures the innocent to feel they have to admit to something they didn't do.

 

[ZipDisk]

The harsh light of day is not kind. I feel this, like every other fucking lolcow case, is damaged by the police or courts trying to engage in "kindness" or "Let's keep this quiet because there are children involved." In reality, they are trying to serve silence, and make their county seem less exciting than these outlier fucking moron mutants have made things.

I want the trust to run dry.

Also, I now realize it's kandiyohi, not kandiyoshi. Kandiyoshi county is much cooler than this fucking shitberg.
DONUT PLAINS MOTHERFUCKER,

 

[Melty Butter]

Gabe's "research" could have amounted to a post here.

Gabe should have stopped sperging about old info and nothing burgers.

PPP is probably correct. He mentioned tonight that Gabe was trying to present a case to get funding for a documentary. (Didn't someone else here mention that? @RaptInPlastic?)

And, that's fine. If true, that's a noble project. The issue is that if there was any evidence to back up his implied pedo claims, this thread would have been all over it. A few dozen posts here have already listed the "smoke" to that possible fire.

• Nick's remarks about American Beauty & Redo the Healer
• Nick's favored porn stars
• Who he associates with (rumored pedos/pedo sympathizers, documented abusers)
• Nick's favorite kid who sometimes slept in the master (I can't even remember where that came from but I recall it being reliable)

Why Gabe factored Sophie Long into this is beyond me. There were accusations from both parents that she was being sexually abused by the other. It was all a debacle associated with custody issues. Gabe clearly didn't do his research. Katie from WithoutACrystalBall would have spoken to him; she's a problematic person but she knows her facts on this case. She'd have probably sent him her (now privated) videos on the case.

Anyway, if Gabe needs evidence to present to a rainmaker for a documentary, there are better ways to find it. They exist in these almost 10,000 pages.

 

[Necrosan]

View attachment 7501170
View attachment 7501173
archive
ghostarchive

What the fuck is this? The only people I've ever heard talking like this are trannies. I know he has holes in his brain but I can't believe this is what they think passes for humor. Imagine overhearing a conversation like this between two men at a bar.

 

[ZipDisk]

e mentioned tonight that Gabe was trying to present a case to get funding for a documentary.

Too late. No content. Fucker burned his time candle.

 

[Swole McPole]

Nick talks about the secrets of Youtube success (it's the wine moms).

He should offer up the Cokestream as a paid lesson in how to build engagement:

Stream content like this and all of your local law enforcement and child protection services will immediately subscribe to your channel!

 

[Permanent Resident Cope]

Seems a bit anti-semitic

You know, with Rekieta, the more I learn about that guy, the more I don't care for him. There's nothing redeeming about the guy. How on earth can these viewers follow this lunatic? And they're like oooh he's soo funny and knowledgeable and I tune in to the guy and he's yelling at a fella just cooking a meal.

 

[Sneed Force One]

9th - 14th of June
It’s been a week of highs and lows , from unprovoked confessions of child suplexing, to shoddy reporting and hundred-pages motions.
Nick Rekieta himself has admitted that his channel is shrinking, but how bad is it? Lets find out!
(Data from Playboard is limited to roughly 30 days, because it costs $99 a month to see 90 days.)

Peak Concurrent Viewers (Per Week)

Week	Peak Viewers	Change (#)	% Change
12/05 – 18/05	1,577	Data Limit	Data Limit
19/05 – 25/05	1,937	+360	+22.82%
26/05 – 01/06	1,631	-306	-15.80%
02/06 – 08/06	1,664	+33	+2.02%
09/06 – 15/06	1,430	-234	-14.06%

Total Peak Viewership loss from 12/05 to 15/06: -9.32%
Nearly 1/10th of peak virality lost in a month.

Avg. Concurrent Viewers (Per Week)

Week	Avg. Viewers	Change (#)	% Change
12/05 – 18/05	1,341	Data Limit	Data Limit
19/05 – 25/05	1,335	-6	-0.45%
26/05 – 01/06	1,134	-201	-15.06%
02/06 – 08/06	1,065	-69	-6.08%
09/06 – 15/06	987	-78	-7.32%

Total Peak Viewership loss from 12/05 to 15/06: -26.39%
Over a 1/4th of viewership lost in a month.

 

[and six goriilion others]

What stake does the government have in fighting this? I don't understand. They arrested Nick and charged and convicted him, but he has enough pull with them that they won't release body cam of his arrest?

Assuming you're talking about the release of the bodycam, I'd guess the state either fucked up something and want to hide illegal actions, it being a part of the plea deal would be illegal since they should've mentioned it to the judge among other things. If it gets released, maybe it'll come out that it was part of the plea deal (probably via Nick).
Or they just don't like people looking over their shoulder when they're doing their job. Being scrutinized like that isn't fun, but then they took the wrong profession by working for the government.

There's a chance they're doing it because they think they have to protect the privacy of Nick, that they think that that's Nick's right, but I think it's not his right at this point and I don't think they'd go through these lengths to do that. Also with how sure Nick was that it wouldn't be released, I can only imagine they had talks before the plea deal about if it would be released.