US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder how they handle that argument when it comes to Palestine Judea?
They don't care. They use what ever is handy to attack and ignore anything sent back their way. You will never convince them of anything. The goal is to convince the spectators. But how many real independents are left at this point?
 
A man drives an Ineos Grenadier in Pershing Square in DTLA, then climbs onto the roof of the vehicle and waves a Mexican flag, drawing cheers from the crowd

1.mp4
Oh, a $100,000 British luxury SUV.

So another Marxist subversive violent protester is a wealthy privileged white kid. Imagine my shock.
 
They don't care. They use what ever is handy to attack and ignore anything sent back their way. You will never convince them of anything. The goal is to convince the spectators. But how many real independents are left at this point?
This.

And remember, Leftists don't KNOW anything. They actually don't BELIEVE anything.

They just parrot the talking points. They exist and are fed media, so that's what they repeat without understanding any of it.

Video from cringe but it does show exactly how leftists think and operate.
 
View attachment 7490074

Yeah, I think they get off on slave labor. I could probably think of two solutions that COULD work over illegal immigration.
Why the fuck do they all think this is some kind of vicious "own" against conservatives? They're literally admitting to modern slavery. There's no way to sugarcoat that statement. "Now that we can't get this back-breaking labor done illegally by illegals for $5/hr -- well below the federal minimum wage, subjecting them to actual slave wages -- you might have to do it. Also lolno, we're not doing it ourselves either."

Fucking. Idiots.
 
and their little dogs too
Not caught up but kudos to the "Wizard of Oz" ref!

Thread tax:

It's odd when change happens so quickly
(Debridement can make one feel sickly)
Though bad it might feel
We're ready to heal
And thin out what once spread so thickly
--------------
If you must wave a flag in the air
It's best that you choose it with care
It's really not hard
You fucking retard
But Mexico's all you had to spare?!
 
Daily reminder
1749672389848.webp
He has risen!
c3I4V0RP (1).webp
Jesus, the King of Kings, the Prince of Peace, has died on the cross for the forgiveness of all sin. And just three days later, through his resurrection defeated death for all (yes, even us kiwifarms posters) who are baptized and follow him.
God bless America!
 
Targeted advertising is really good:
View attachment 7490559
response to riots, by ethnicity
spic:
>VIVA LA RAZA VIVA MEXICO
>NOOOO DONT DEPORT ME TO MEXICO AAAAAH
>*sets fire to random electric vehicle*

white:
>WHY AREN'T THEY BEING MOWED DOWN BY MACHINE GUNS ALREADY?!
>MORE TROOPS! MORE WEAPONS! MARTIAL LAW! TMD NOW NOW NOW!
*shitposts impotently on the internet*

black:
>haha time for free shoes and tvs again
>police best stay outta my way muhfugga
*robs the corner store for a pack of newports*

jew:
>legal troubles, goyim? deportation orders looming? criminal charges for rioting and looting?
>attorneys rosenberg and shekelstein are ready to take care of business for a modest fee!
>*rubs hands*
 
Why the fuck do they all think this is some kind of vicious "own" against conservatives? They're literally admitting to modern slavery. There's no way to sugarcoat that statement. "Now that we can't get this back-breaking labor done illegally by illegals for $5/hr -- well below the federal minimum wage, subjecting them to actual slave wages -- you might have to do it. Also lolno, we're not doing it ourselves either."

Fucking. Idiots.

Joke's on those urbanoid bugmen, I already harvest my own crops in the hot sun. Pasty-white soft hands could never.

I'm also sure the $5.50 an hour is a bit of an exaggeration. Maybe in the late 1980s. When I was growing up, I helped pick crops as a summer job in high school for $11 an hour and a meal from the farmer's wife. I also worked with a lot of Hispanic guys who would come over on work visas and work in the fields during harvest season, enjoy their beer and food at the end of their shifts, and then fucked off back to their home country to live relatively well until they came back next year to do it again.

The problem is over the years, they've come to just cut off that last step and just overstay their visas, since enforcement in this country has been lax for at least a decade.
 
This is retarded advice.
No, it isn't.

Prosecutors throughout the US have successfully argued (and won convictions in self-defense cases) that because a person didn't mag dump into their attacker, they didn't fear for their lives. e.g. "you weren't really terrified he was going to kill you; you just wanted to stop him, and you were so calm and collected you were able to stop yourself from mag dumping, ergo you weren't so terrified that you had no conscious control of your actions."

Always mag dump. Not just because it helps your legal defense later, but also because if you're going to shoot some asshole for trying to kill you, you want to make sure the fucker is dead. Partly to prevent him testifying against you later, but mostly to prevent him fucking killing you if your first couple of shots don't kill him first.
 
No, it isn't.

Prosecutors throughout the US have successfully argued (and won convictions in self-defense cases) that because a person didn't mag dump into their attacker, they didn't fear for their lives. e.g. "you weren't really terrified he was going to kill you; you just wanted to stop him, and you were so calm and collected you were able to stop yourself from mag dumping, ergo you weren't so terrified that you had no conscious control of your actions."

Always mag dump. Not just because it helps your legal defense later, but also because if you're going to shoot some asshole for trying to kill you, you want to make sure the fucker is dead. Partly to prevent him testifying against you later, but mostly to prevent him fucking killing you if your first couple of shots don't kill him first.
only downside to magdumping is if there's another enemy then you're kinda screwed with an empty mag
 
No, it isn't.

Prosecutors throughout the US have successfully argued (and won convictions in self-defense cases) that because a person didn't mag dump into their attacker, they didn't fear for their lives. e.g. "you weren't really terrified he was going to kill you; you just wanted to stop him, and you were so calm and collected you were able to stop yourself from mag dumping, ergo you weren't so terrified that you had no conscious control of your actions."

Always mag dump. Not just because it helps your legal defense later, but also because if you're going to shoot some asshole for trying to kill you, you want to make sure the fucker is dead. Partly to prevent him testifying against you later, but mostly to prevent him fucking killing you if your first couple of shots don't kill him first.
This is absolutely retarded advice. I suggest you listen or read some books by self defense attorneys on the matter.

Edit: It's 4am and I really don't care to argue, you'll most likely never end up in a self defense situation regardless, but.... Do you think it would've helped or hurt Rittenhouses case had he magdumped into any of his attackers?
 
Last edited:
That nigger hit the back of his head real hard.
That's how that other guy died a few days ago.
The white bro seemed to have hit his head too. If not, close to it.
That was a dangerous move for both of them.
I completely agree with the sentiment but it's not worth it to go to jail for accidentally killing a nigger like that, or seriously hurting yourself.
There are much better targets if you're feeling like ruining your life for justice.
If every white guy spear tackled one nigger to death America would be an ethnostate yesterday.
 
> on a random podcast
>"Omg you're all, like, soooooooooooo misogynistic~"
>"Uh... okay. How do you define misogyny?"
>immediately starts acting like she's being held hostage by ISIS where if she speaks out of turn or raises her voice she'll be raped and/or beheaded by her captor
>literally begging to go home and silently weeping

Screenshot 2025-03-11 152139.webp

Nigga wtf
 
Last edited:
Why the fuck do they all think this is some kind of vicious "own" against conservatives? They're literally admitting to modern slavery. There's no way to sugarcoat that statement. "Now that we can't get this back-breaking labor done illegally by illegals for $5/hr -- well below the federal minimum wage, subjecting them to actual slave wages -- you might have to do it. Also lolno, we're not doing it ourselves either."

Fucking. Idiots.
Leftists think they are still fighting boomercon style Republicans.
 
Based legal Beaners are backing Trump's war on illegals. Currently 300 comments in reddit thread on a very progressive and pro-riot subreddit r/LosAngeles.
The vast majority are saying that the MAGA Beaners are backing the crackdown. Those comments are heavily upvoted.

Redditors' only explanation is that everyone who doesn't think like a progressive redditor is an idiot.
Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.15.51.webp
Link
Archive
A few examples
Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.17.05.webp Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.16.53.webp Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.16.37.webp
Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.16.10.webp
Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.18.45.webp
Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.18.01.webp Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.18.30.webp
Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.20.39.webp
Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.21.22.webp
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.16.27.webp
    Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.16.27.webp
    42.9 KB · Views: 22
  • Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.15.51.webp
    Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.15.51.webp
    85.4 KB · Views: 23
  • Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.17.23.webp
    Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.17.23.webp
    13.7 KB · Views: 21
  • Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.18.59.webp
    Screenshot 2025-06-12 12.18.59.webp
    10.4 KB · Views: 31
Why the fuck do they all think this is some kind of vicious "own" against conservatives? They're literally admitting to modern slavery. There's no way to sugarcoat that statement. "Now that we can't get this back-breaking labor done illegally by illegals for $5/hr -- well below the federal minimum wage, subjecting them to actual slave wages -- you might have to do it. Also lolno, we're not doing it ourselves either."

Fucking. Idiots.

Kind of an aside, but I suspect the current arrangement might actually be cheaper than 19th century (and prior) slavery.

Yes, they're paid 5 dollars an hour, but the responsibility of feeding/clothing/housing/providing medical care to the illegal immigrant has been pushed onto the taxpayer, and there's no upfront cost of purchasing them. There's also no liability on the part of whoever employs them because they aren't considered the employer's property. If a slave were to damage someone else's property or commit a crime that would require a fine, I imagine the slave owner would ultimately be responsible for the penalty (the way I might be liable if my dog bites a child or tears up someone's yard).

So really it just seems like the most corporatized form of slavery that could exist without allowing companies to advertise on specific Juans and Robertos like it's fucking NASCAR.
 
Back
Top Bottom