Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
Time for another poll?

How much will Null be awarded in sanctions against Greee pursuant to ECF 330?

- $720, being the full amount claimed viz. 2.4 hours of Matthew Hardin's time @ $300 per hour
- Greater than $0 but less than $720 viz. some BS amount Judge Barlow pulled out of his ass as per ECF 230
- $0
Positive Pollies will say 720
 
Now, this does require somebody to have to cognitive capacity to understand that issuing subpoenas to your opposition is an activity that you would undertake during discovery. Russ' extensive paralegal training has unfortunately not allowed him to parse such matters.
No, we're missing the forest for the greees - the 10th clearly has indicated that time travel is acceptable - so Greee just issued the subpoena now but it's still after the motion to dismiss.
 
Time for another poll?

How much will Null be awarded in sanctions against Greee pursuant to ECF 330?

- $720, being the full amount claimed viz. 2.4 hours of Matthew Hardin's time @ $300 per hour
- Greater than $0 but less than $720 viz. some BS amount Judge Barlow pulled out of his ass as per ECF 230
- $0
how bout $1000 :shit-eating:
ngl it would be extremely funny if the judge would just auto grant every sanction against greee for each instance of his obnoxious bullshit and wasting the courts time and slap him with exactly $1000 each time. how many grand in sanctions is this lawsuit worth to you rusty? 4? 12? 26?
 
"WOOHOO! I'm gonna spend my winnings all on (legal) hookers. Ooh la la! 😜😎"
It would be funnier if Kiwi Farms, a website, made a donation to the lady who is buying up and demolishing 'historic' brothels.

Greer is either incompetent to represent himself or is malicious.
Your 'either/or' is redundant. It's both.

I had never come across the highly legal term 'flyspecking' before. I now understand it to mean 'no evidentiary or factual basis is required to be stated in actionable legal filings'.

I agree that Greee is working unsociable hours. He's submitting emails while watching 'Suits' on his break. I look forward to him dropping 'I don't get you Meghan Markle (I loved you for your sparkle)', the song of the summer of 2029.

Russell no longer has his IPF sanctions shield so I look to the future with a very, very small amount of hope.
 
I really wish some big normie pandering lawtube channel would pick it up not to discuss the case itself, but the fact that several courts will gladly accomodate for a total mushmouth retard sped shitlips litigant, up to and including doing plaintiff's work for him, and drag the case on for years, seemingly only because everyone involved in it from the government is incompetent and should be disposed of.
The vast majority of Lawtubers worship the Judiciary. The only ones that don't are 2A Advocates and Constitutionalists but even THEN there are exceptions.
The system can be criticized, but it can't be doubted, and it always has to be respected. If it isn't, well, everything falls apart you see.
It's in the Constitution, after all.
The Judiciary REALLY has two jobs based off of who they're dealing with. If it's "The Government" their job is "interpret" Law in a way most favorable to the Government. Only when the SC steps in and says "We LITERALLY can't find a way to give the Government deference here. Like.. There's literally a line in the Constitution that expressesly forbids this in this exact way" do they limit Governmental power.
For squabbles between commoners and corporations they get free reign to do whatever they want. If it's a bad ruling an appeals court basically gives deference to lower courts unless it's so egregious they can't ignore it. The SC basically doesn't like doing anything, hoping their bad children in the lower courts can handle it. Only when it's obvious a lower court has fabricated law (also known as POWER) from thin air do they step in and do something. They really don't like it when Districts start forming little fiefdoms that ignore decades of settled law.

I'm beginning to think this court ain't great at the whole judiciarying thing.
It's Nulls money, and the Judge gets paid either way. He's got no dog in the fight so why would the Court care? To be fair this is kind of how you'd LIKE it to go when some normie with no legal experience or money sues a corpo. It never DOES, but ideally you'd want the Courts to be kind of favorable to you when you're in appeals court over of a summery dismissal for Qualified Immunity when a cop mag dumps you because you reached did your wallet.

What the fuck is Utah's problem where they blatantly disregard law? This entire process has become such a mockery and a shitshow. Does the judge not care? Do the courts not care? Are these morons in Utah just that apathetic? Do they seriously not see the legal rammifications already shaping up from their blunder (ISPs v Sony). Are they seriously bending over backwards for a "man" who has repeatedly defied and failed to produce evidence?
To be fair Judges will do shit like this when they REALLY don't like you and don't want to have your case back on appeals, or disagree with an issue being challenged in court.
Like they'll give you the benefit of the doubt or guide you down pathways to questioning so you can argue multiple points, even if they suck or are bad. It removes it as a pathway to appeal and solidifies precedent.
 
Don't say that, Scaven win in the lore! (Don't they? Been a looooong time)
Well he is one now
images.webp file_00000000d55462468f14b8e071da00fd.webp

P.S. I hope I don't derail thread with this.
 
Russ seems to think that since Hardin "discovered" information, discovery is open again. They really did give this idiot a pity paralegal degree.


Reading a trashy legal thriller gives you a better legal education.
 
At this point I'm convinced Greer could just assault Hardin in the parking lot and the judge would simply tell him not to do that and keep the case going. Feels like the court is willing to let anything happen because "Kiwi Farms Evil!!!"
 
At this point I'm convinced Greer could just assault Hardin in the parking lot and the judge would simply tell him not to do that and keep the case going. Feels like the court is willing to let anything happen because "Kiwi Farms Evil!!!"
The frustrating thing about facing off against a stupid, brazen, shameless legal opponent is that they’re not wrong to keep pushing the envelope. Judges frequently coddle them at every pass, thereby actively incentivizing the assholes to keep doing it. Literally nothing surprises me anymore when it comes to judges getting it wrong and rewarding those who act exclusively in bad faith.
 
I have realized we have entered the phase of this case that could best be described as

SANCTIONKRIEG

Also considering Russel's love of Adolph Hitler I went looking for a funny propaganda poster to celebrate SanctionKrieg.

This is funny without any edits.
1749215317118.webp
 
I have realized we have entered the phase of this case that could best be described as

SANCTIONKRIEG
Monsieur, of all people, you should know that this is more like Russell's battle of Sedan: He's stuck "in the chamber pot and about to be shat upon".

Also considering Russel's love of Adolph Hitler I went looking for a funny propaganda poster
Russell would be an ideal poster child for Aktion T4. Or Planned Parenthood.
 
When I woke up today, I was thinking "I wonder how they actually went about getting the subpoena issue fixed, did the judge have to get involved or was it just explaining things to the clerk?"

I didn't expect to log on and find out Russ had committed YET ANOTHER fraud on the court, already up for sanctions. Good God what a fuckup :story:
 
My guess is Greee figured he did his part by telling the court fees are needed for the SPO application, null plz pay, and with that he was free and clear to do his subpoena-ing.
 
Last edited:
My guess is Greer figured he did his part by telling the court fees are needed for the SPO application, null plz pay, and with that he was free and clear to do his subpoena-ing.
You know, if Greee wasn't a few R's short of retard, he'd realize he could have just had the clerk issue a subpoena to the Utah State Court for the documents needed ....

Checkmate, jurists!
 
I'm going to give Mr. Greee some credit, his emails do make me chuckle with glee(e).

"Matthew is a pro hac vice attorney, whose credentials im highly skeptical of. These pestering emails are an example."

Yes. Mr. Greee, (who is a pro se litigant), the pro hac vice attorney is totally below you on the pecking order. These emails to the clerk of the very court your case is in, relating to a matter of that case, is pestering.
 
Last edited:
I don't mean to get greedy, we got a sanction already even before breakfast, but...

1749220366992.webp

Where's the motion, Russ? You've got the Clerk's attention, surely they'd be quick about filing it. So where's the good faith honest pro se demand for clarification of a cut-and-dry issue? I'm grabbing a sandwich in an hour, I better have something hilariously stupid to read!
 
Back
Top Bottom