💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 170 24.3%

  • Total voters
    700
I think a lot of Nick's anger about the requests for bodycam footage stems from the fact it places him in this lose-lose position. On one hand, if the footage is made public, people will see the state of his house, his pathetic arguments with the police and how badly he neglected his kids. That's obviously something that would be very humiliating for him. But on the other hand, his obstinance towards not wanting it to be public draws far more attention to it and has galvanised an entire community of people eagerly awaiting and supporting legal motions that publicise something that most people would've probably forgotten about if it had been released a year ago. It's also probably very frustrating for him because he's a narcissist who likes to control narratives, which means he really hates those second hand accounts of what the footage was from K and others but he's also can't release the footage to "exonerate" himself.
 
View attachment 7441490

I wouldn't put too much stock in this AI detection tool.
i won't say it's 100% accurate, but i have been playing around with it all afternoon and i think it's biased to calling things real, because every time it's gotten it wrong (3 times out of I'd say 30-40 photos for me) it's by calling an AI generated photo real and never calling a real photo AI.

would it be admissible in court? no, but it's consistent enough for me to believe it when it says something in the photo is AI.
 
Kiwilawyers I propose one, or many, of you draft an official looking tongue in cheek letter to Null demanding rekieta be in the running for lolcow of the year 2025. We must work together to correct this injustice.
 
We laugh about it as a joke but unironically I think Nick has permanent brain damaged from drug, alcohol, and now nitrous abuse
 
Don’t store medicines (even OTC ones), vitamins, etc. in the bathroom like this fucking retard does. It gets too hot and steamy in there and they degrade more quickly.

Just hoping the Advil have been rendered completely ineffective for his next headache. (As if he won’t pop a narcotic anyway.)
 
Conveniently off camera.
7428119-575c4a2f9a1ae1e8d9495faccfd5724b (1).webp
images (1) (5).webp
Fatherless behavior
Add it to the list of crimes
Nick's being sardonic about his kids living in a drug den - which he's just spent the last 5 minutes admitting they were.

He just doesn't care.
Get out of here cop!

I'm reminded of the time 6 days/250 pages ago when Nick did a comedic riff on what his Coked out daughter sounded like answering the cops in order to entertain a pedophile.
 

Attachments

  • images (1) (5).webp
    images (1) (5).webp
    4.6 KB · Views: 20
Nick is a Chris Chan level retard where random trolls on the Internet can get him to do retarded shit that makes him look bad for no reason

Soon we're gonna see the Julaaaay video we were teased at with the Mandy saga
Once he has the footage, Null is in a very real position to be able to do that. I don't expect he will because he's not a lunatic, but the opportunity is definitely there. A nice subtle torture would be obtain it, announce that it's in possession, then wait a few times while Nick spirals. The only sad thing there is he'll take it out on his family.
 
The message is clear:
Just keep laughing at Nick here. He has no inhibitions anymore and will just react to ridicule by embarrassing himself even more
 
Guys, the EXIF on the lounge photo isn't legitimate. It took him 20 minutes to get it because he went to Google and did this:

1748828755798.webp

It's an obvious mix of arrest day photos and non arrest day photos. Sprinkle a few images of some cops in there and call it good.
 
i won't say it's 100% accurate, but i have been playing around with it all afternoon and i think it's biased to calling things real, because every time it's gotten it wrong (3 times out of I'd say 30-40 photos for me) it's by calling an AI generated photo real and never calling a real photo AI.

would it be admissible in court? no, but it's consistent enough for me to believe it when it says something in the photo is AI.
I think people are way over thinking the AI thing. He can't plan shit out like that. And if he did he would have had the photos stacked up ready to go on his PC.

While fumbling around he said the photos where on his PHONE and he was trying to get them to his PC. Why wouldn't they already be on his PC with all his other court stuff?
I think someone hit the nail on the head by saying the clean photos are the photos he took, on his phone, when applying to get his kids back. After the house was cleaned. He fumbled around to shuffle those in with the few real raid day photos with the messy junkie looking living room and the shitfloor/cop photo to try and validate all the photos. These photos where clearly not all in the same folder ready to go, if they where he could have just showed them one after the next.
 
Guys, the EXIF on the lounge photo isn't legitimate. It took him 20 minutes to get it because he went to Google and did this:

View attachment 7442137

It's an obvious mix of arrest day photos and non arrest day photos. Sprinkle a few images of some cops in there and call it good.
people noted that the images were sent via signal. i'm pretty sure that almost everything has wiped EXIF data when you send images since the early 2010s because people were ripping GPS coordinates from facebook posts and shit.

edit: maybe it wast just location data. it's been a long time since 4chan sleuthing people's shit by checking exif data on uploads. maybe resolution and time still stay. that's how a lot of anons used to get dox'd when they got a little brave with personal photos.
 
Back
Top Bottom