💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[lIllllIiiiiLLLLiiiiIIIIll]

LOLSUIT TIME. NULL PROMISED.

Maybe the real lolcow content will be the content we make along the way.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Even at the time that ending was hamhanded, the whole "homophobic Nazi turns out to be gay himself!" shit. Even Falling Down handled that one better and it was actually funny.

I kinda intentionally take things at face value when it subverts subversion, like how in the end of The Believer, the dude gets everyone out of the synagogue but goes to hell anyways because Jews don’t believe in Jesus

 

[Schpoots]

I'm in kandiyohi counties walls.

 

[Meat Target]

he has no money though. hed have to ask his dad for thousands just to avoid looking like an idiot.

His parents let the crack whore stay at their house, I wouldn’t put it past them funding a lolsuit

Therein lies the problem. The skelly faggot just so happens to be the deadbeat son of boomer oil barons, and that kind of money is what gets you the best lawyers.

 

[MeltyTW]

His parents let the crack whore stay at their house, I wouldn’t put it past them funding a lolsuit

i would, passive enabling is easy " i need several thousand dollars minimum so the internet wont mock me or my already ruined reputation and josh null doesnt get a dubya" is a lot harder even if youre wealthy. also if josh makes good on his promise then they covered for a child abuser nick without even avoiding legal trouble anyway. and unlike nick null still actually has a platform and friends with platforms so theyd be better off having nick screaming his little helium fag voice out on his 2 view shithole.

Therein lies the problem. The skelly faggot just so happens to be the deadbeat son of boomer oil barons, and that kind of money is what gets you the best lawyers.

heres the thing, nicks parents are enablers, i cant imagine even they would spend ten grand minimum even if richest of rich to protect their son on this particular angle, its like if he sucked aaron's dick live but wanted to sue someone calling him a fag. theres no point wasting money on that even if youre a faggy enabler.

 

[AnOminous]

Because Jersh likely has more native american blood than Elizabeth Warren maybe he could wrangle a treaty with the Federal government as a sovereign Indian tribe and the Farms could be funded by legalized gambling.

I demand Candy Yoshi declare me a Lakota Sioux or else I'll Lakota Sue. I once knew a Lakota Sioux guy. That basically makes me one myself.

 

[RaptInPlastic]

None of those records drops by MNPublicRecords were illegal. The records that person dropped were difficult to access. They were not on the internet and required physical presence at a court-house to access. But they were public records at the time.

This is why I put "illegally" in quotes since the faggot Rekieta was whining in his high pitched voice how MNPublic broke the law (lol) in releasing them

 

[SigmaBalls]

PotentiallyPennyLawyer Sean is covering the news tonight in an hour, So this thread can stop blind guessing and infighting over the implications now

https://www.youtube.com/live/nq6ilPEr9Mc?si=lILQyGD5h559QkAc

 

[not william stenchever]

IT'S NOT TRUE!!
HE HAS A MANLY DEEP VOICE NOW FROM ALL THE WHIPPETS.
View attachment 7428090

 

[Brian Oblivion]

This is especially true since he's responding to a direct request "to detail what your exhibits are", since it's possible to interpret "get rid of" in the sense of detailing them quickly and moving on. This interpretation is aided by the fact that he then says they are "not particularly relevant" which is distinct from "irrelevant".

Yeah that seems to be the most obvious explanation as he follows that by saying they relate solely to a single issue which was just raised and discussed (i.e. "we've already covered/agreed on what the body cams would be used for ostensibly so we can just move on from any further discussion of them for now").

 

[lIllllIiiiiLLLLiiiiIIIIll]

Therein lies the problem. The skelly faggot just so happens to be the deadbeat son of boomer oil barons, and that kind of money is what gets you the best lawyers.

Then if they insist, their generational wealth continues to pour out into the soil for useless love of their spoiled, retarded son. If they insist that's the best use of their money, that's what happens and karma does take its due in that way instead. What could have been a great family becomes an unremarkable one because Rackets is that retarded and egoistic and his parents are enablers who get exactly what they deserve from him.

 

[AnOminous]

Yeah that seems to be the most obvious explanation as a follows that by saying they relate solely to a single issue which was just raised (i.e. "we've already covered/agreed on what the body cams would be used for ostensibly so we can just move on from that any further discussion of them for now").

It sounds to me like Pierce was reserving the right to enter them as evidence, which is different from a formal listing of them in a disclosure of exhibits to be used at trial. This motion (if granted) may remove one ground for disclosure of the footage, but certainly doesn't foreclose other avenues for disclosure.

So this thread can stop blind guessing and infighting over the implications now

But we're so good at it!

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Before the thread is nuked due to Nick super winning all of the cases and being allowed to do meth as compensation for being illegally reported I wanna say that it has been a pleasure being retarded and wrong with all you wrong retards. Semblar Fo, silly Billys.

 

[sneedem&feedem]

But it's also entirely possible they just want to avoid skellysuits.

So to avoid a lawsuit from Rekieta they're risking a lawsuit from Null? Is this Kandiyohi county calling Null bitchmade and that he won't sue? "WELL ACKSUALLY WE ARENT RELEASING JACK SHIT WUT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT BISSSH?"

 

[Meat Target]

Then if they insist, their generational wealth continues to pour out into the soil for useless love of their spoiled, retarded son. If they insist that's the best use of their money, that's what happens and karma does take its due in that way instead. What could have been a great family becomes an unremarkable one because Rackets is that retarded and egoistic and his parents are enablers who get exactly what they deserve from him.

...but wait...
"We can remain retarded longer than they can remain solvent".

Dear Feeder should set up a drive for the warchest. Bankrupt those enabling fucks.

 

[SigmaBalls]

But we're so good at it!

You were good son, real good. maybe even the best.

So to avoid a lawsuit from Rekieta they're risking a lawsuit from Null? Is this Kandiyohi county calling Null bitchmade and that he won't sue? "WELL ACKSUALLY WE ARENT RELEASING JACK SHIT WUT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT BISSSH?"

"I DON'T THINK YOU DESERVE THAT BODYCAM TO TELL YA THE TRUTH ABOUT IT"

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

If this motion prevents the bodycam footage from going out, then Nick Rekieta and Kandiyohi County have unfortunately sentenced Ethan Oliver Ralph to death. This is because when Ralph receives the $5,000.00 owed to him by Null, he will immediately die from an overdose. Nick, why would you do this to your friend?!

 

[Joggin Noggin]

Retard question here, so is this the county directly countering Josh to say he doesn't have a right to the bodycam due to not being public record on that account?

In effect, kinda, but I think of it more as them at least saying "Null's not entitled to it under this specific subsection".

It could be because the prosecutors actually care and don't believe that Null is entitled to the footage at all, or it could be them realizing that this is a fight that will happen regardless between Nick and Null and they want to make sure the record is as accurate as possible so no fault can be placed at their feet if the footage is released. It takes very little time to draft this and given how public this case is, I wouldn't want some ambiguity from my hearing resulting in footage being released under an inapplicable statute. Hard to tell based solely off the filing what the prosecutor's motivations actually are.

This would simply get rid of the easiest argument for Hardin to get the footage under Section 13.82(7), but 13.82(7) still allows for inactive investigation data to be gotten, including images and recordings, photographs, video, and audio records, unless the data is "clearly offensive to common sensibilities" in which case it's classified as private or nonpublic data.

For an investigation to become inactive, one of the following things has to happen:
1) A decision by the agency or prosecutorial authority to not bring charges (inapplicable);
2) expiration of the time to bring a charge or file a complaint under the applicable statute of limitations, or 30 years after the commission of the offense, whichever comes earliest (inapplicable); or
3) exhaustion of or expiration of all rights of appeal by a person convicted on the basis of the investigative data.

Minnesota Criminal Procedure 28.05 gives you 90 days to file a notice of appeal after the judgment has been given and sentence imposed, so Nick's case can't become inactive until at least July 17, 2025 since he was just sentenced on April 18th.

So 13.82(7) appears to still be an avenue for Hardin to get the bodycam, even with the state clarfiying that the bodycam footage wasn't an exhibit, but first it'd have to become inactive and then it becomes contingent on if the court believes that the release of the bodycam footage (even if heavily redacted) would clearly offend the common sensibilities of their shithole state. The court also has to weigh the benefit to Null vs any harm to the public, the agency, or anyone identified in the bodycam footage that would be released. I'm not going to waste time reading cases to find out where the "common sensibilities" line has been drawn in the past regarding bodycam footage of a guilty man's arrest while in his home, but I imagine that Minnesota is probably not as keen on releasing it compared to the average state.

 

[Chazzed Up]

The fact that even the county is sweeping for Nick at this point is hilarious. What kind of karmic lottery winner do you need to be to slip out of consequences this consistently? The sacred geometry of lolcows is truly beyond mortal understanding. It's staggering. They suffer, but only ever because of their own narcissistic bondage. External reality can never touch them.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

It sounds to me like Pierce was reserving the right to enter them as evidence, which is different from a formal listing of them in a disclosure of exhibits to be used at trial. This motion (if granted) may remove one ground for disclosure of the footage, but certainly doesn't foreclose other avenues for disclosure.

It was the Barneswalker who cited the footage in his motion to dismiss and uploaded the footage as exhibits prior to the hearing. White and Pierce do not appear to be on the same page throughout the hearing about what she was "conceding" to, and she has to come in at the end to clarify what she actually agreed to.

Yeah that seems to be the most obvious explanation as he follows that by saying they relate solely to a single issue which was just raised and discussed (i.e. "we've already covered/agreed on what the body cams would be used for ostensibly so we can just move on from any further discussion of them for now").

The transcripts also reflect that White wanted to get it on record that he raised it in the omnibus hearing because he concluded that there was a case where a similar issue was found to be harmless error because it was raised later in the proceedings.