Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Goofy Logic]

View attachment 7417989
"Your honor the defense is wrong because I have no evidence that proves they are wrong."

https://youtube.com/watch?v=4Ru8DMW-grY

You need to hang onto your tax returns for 7-10 years. Russ is just a very poor record keeper

 

[Harambe]

How does he not get that protesting increasingly loudly that he had money and used it to pay for expenses in 2020 makes unsealing the IFP application essentially necessary?

Also, I'd like to point out, in the last few filings greer has consistently typed IFP (in forma pauperis) as IPF. what a fuckin dummy

 

[and six goriilion others]

Those are a lot of typos. That combined with it being 3 filings while it could've just been one, it really seems like he was shook and trying to get this out ASAP.

Honestly I'm kinda doubtful there was fraud on Greer's side, and more tardguarding from the court's side and them just granting IFP based on the true facts Greer gave.

 

[Unknown God]

Hardin's argument that he didn't qualify for IFP based on his income alone assumed $14/hr. Greer now confirmed that he earned $16/hr.
I will also need some legal clarification: is going through a very temporary and mild financial hardship such as moving enough to qualify you as a pauper as far as courts are concerned? I'm going to guess no.

 

[Hweeks]

My favorite part is where he has a screenshot of his book title now officially in the court records. I don't know if he has done that before, but it's ... chefs kiss...

 

[GaryGray]

Yuh honuh, I was too busy spending my money to use it to pay my court fees. The defense is clearly using my own lawsuit to harass me, it's supposed to be the other way around!
View attachment 7417995

Who is Ben Done and why was he helping Greer move?!

 

[lol cow supreme]

318-320 are some of the weirdest filings yet! "Yuh honnah I waited too long to sue the creepy stalkers on kiwifarms so I had to do a fraud to get IPF (i pee freely?) status so I could file in time! It wasn't my fault I did the fraud it was the creepy statute of limitations!"

 

[DavidS877]

You need to hang onto your tax returns for 7-10 years. Russ is just a very poor record keeper

Luckily, if it becomes necessary the IRS will provide copies for at least 7 years.

 

[obsdj]

My favorite part is where he has a screenshot of his book title now officially in the court records. I don't know if he has done that before, but it's ... chefs kiss...

My own favorite is where he included a screenshot of a Facebook post of a U-Haul truck as "proof" that he "was moving" and by implication that he must have paid some unspecified amount of fees to U-Haul in order to move. (The data retention policy is a red herring. He absolutely would have bank records from that time, or at the very least the bank would.)

 

[oh no its pipkun]

Hardin's argument that he didn't qualify for IFP based on his income alone assumed $14/hr. Greer now confirmed that he earned $16/hr.
I will also need some legal clarification: is going through a very temporary and mild financial hardship such as moving enough to qualify you as a pauper as far as courts are concerned? I'm going to guess no.

seems like ifp status is a fluid designation so it seems like you can get it depending on your finances at the start of trial?

im not seeing a tax return which would prove his actual income. and he can go to a uhual center to get the contract or dig through his emails for a copy.he does one thing and called it quits when it doesn't work out

My own favorite is where he included a screenshot of a Facebook post of a U-Haul truck as "proof" that he "was moving" and by implication that he must have paid some unspecified amount of fees to U-Haul in order to move. (The data retention policy is a red herring. He absolutely would have bank records from that time, or at the very least the bank would.)

for all we know it was someone else's uhaul.

 

[Terrifik]

Yuh honuh, I was too busy spending my money to use it to pay my court fees. The defense is clearly using my own lawsuit to harass me, it's supposed to be the other way around!
View attachment 7417995

bold move to test the the box.
please continue you might push IFP wish.

 

[Debbie Macomber]

So Russ admits he had the money on hand and only filed In Forma Pauperis to save money for moving, which I'm pretty sure isn't an excuse to go years and years without ever paying the filing fee

...then admits he had other infusions of cash since then, could afford to spend it as he "had Ben [sic] done" moving, but spent it on trying out for and suing America's Got Talent instead of paying Utah's court fee

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

To prove that plaintiff was saving money

Disposable income.

he didn’t think he could squeeze out the money to meet the filing deadline and also having adequate funds for everything previously explained with regards to moving.

Disposable income.

The December 2020 pandemic stimulus check went to the audition.

Disposable income.

The March 2021 stimulus check went to the AGT lawsuit

Disposable income, for another lolsuit too!

Contrary to defendants’ false accusations, plaintiff doesn’t just file things for the thrill of it, he researches.

Your research leaves a lot to be desired. For example, the insistence that you're entitled to IFP because you've earmarked your disposable income for luxuries such as filing other lolsuits and moving home is sadly incorrect.

 

[Pee Cola]

It is just me, or does this most recent tranche of Russhole filings (ECF 318-320) come across as desperate, if not crestfallen?

It's almost as if Russhole knows he screwed the pooch so badly that no amount of judicial tard guarding and incantations including but not limited to "bizarrely", "excusable neglect" and "10th Circuit" could possibly save him from having this lolsuit dismissed.

 

[Harvey Danger]

My favorite part of 318 is it isn't even an objection to the unsealing. He doesn't even ask for Hardin to be denied in his conclusion. He's just writing out what is (supposedly) contained in ECF 1. He could have just written "I don't object to unsealing because I will be vindicated", but he can't stop himself from plightsplaining.

 

[Swole McPole]

Also, I'm not seeing how Hardin 'got my IFP status revoked.' Judge asked if he could afford to pay. Russell immediately insisted he was rolling in coin and could happily pay,

Surely that's just Greer finally being honest about his financial status? What does that have to do with Hardin -- other than his raising the question about how he can afford to be opening brothels while claiming to be a literal pauper?

Also: is it just me or does anybody else think it's weird that he hoards random photographs of U-haul vans, but his important court documents are just lost to the fucking wind? Despite Dropbox, Google Drive, etc. offering mountains of free space in the cloud.

Seems to me to be something the court would want to pay attention to.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Also, I'm not seeing how Hardin 'got my IFP status revoked.' Judge asked if he could afford to pay. Russell immediately insisted he was rolling in coin and could happily pay,

Mr. Hardin did motion for that, though

 

[Harvey Danger]

It is just me, or does this most recent tranche of Russhole filings (ECF 318-320) come across as desperate, if not crestfallen?

I don't know that he understands what's really going on. He thinks it's strictly a question of backing up his numbers in ECF 1, and that's it.

His sole "argument" in 318 comes closest to being a reasonable expectation of how things work:



"I told the Court I had the money but asked for IPF anyway, and they said OK." Considering the retard asking and the retards passing judgement over in the 10th, I consider this a plausible sequence of events. But it assumes Greer was telling the truth, both now and back then; and that's an assumption huge enough to drive a Uhaul truck through.

And because I can't get off my CITE SOMETHING bit, I'll note that Greer says he "was relying on case law" saying he didn't have to spend all his money on court... without citing the fucking case law.

 

[GaryGray]

My favorite part of 318 is it isn't even an objection to the unsealing. He doesn't even ask for Hardin to be denied in his conclusion. He's just writing out what is (supposedly) contained in ECF 1. He could have just written "I don't object to unsealing because I will be vindicated", but he can't stop himself from plightsplaining.

The filings seem to help Hardin in his argument to be allowed to see ECF 1. Greer admits to having saved up at least $3700 which he then spent in December 2020. Not a stretch to assume that in order to accrue $3700 he would have at least ~$400 in September 2020. Does this mean Greer was close to the IFP threshold who know? It does throw mud into the water around the state of his fiances in 2020. Which was the point Hardin made in ECF 317 on why he would like to see ECF 1. Great to see Greer and Hardin working together.

 

[Bogliacci]

Great to see Greer and Hardin working together.

They sure do make one hell of a team!