US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
literally the meme about "Jesus said to be compassionate someplace so you should let us keep treating you like shit a bit longer" and maybe the one about "Christianity just means being a heckin' wholesome based on the standards of the time." Even has the soyface.
The best thing to do is just to ignore them because they are only trying to force you to do something or think a certain way. Leftist use morality as a weapon and the best defence is indifference.
1000001881.webp

smug atheist 2.webp

smug atheist.webp
 
And now we're back again at the abortion/having kids is such a burden cycle of the thread. It's all so tiresome.

Here, have some Kamala being Kamala from the other side of the world. She still makes zero sense, and she's still being platformed. This too, is all so tiresome.
 
Do you feel they have a mentality of numbers equating to might? Like a swarm of ants trying to collect a crumb.
I think many Chinese legitimately believe they are a military peers to the US. The Battle at Lake Changjin isn't the highest grossing film in China for no reason. Nevermind the fact that the Chosin Reservoir was a massive military blunder by the Chinese, who should have destroyed the 1st Marines. Instead, the UN coalition (with the US 3rd and 7th Infantry) killed a shitload of communists and successfully withdrew from complete encirclement.

"We did it, Wang! We saved the city!"
 
Last edited:
Notice how that retard jew sperging about symbolic chicken sacrifice didn't bother to rebut my post
If you really want an explanation:

Biblically there are three domains. Private, semi-public, and public.

Private domains would be like a house, or a fenced yard. (Apartment buildings require an eruv chatzerus...a different subject)

The parameters for Public domain are probably not what you think. Generally, it has to be a busy market place. The definition of "busy" is a subject of debate, but the generally accepted definition is that 600,000 people (the number of adult males at the time of the giving of the Torah) have to regularly pass through, and that the area is never closed off to civilians. Examples given in the Talmud are roman street markets.

Using those parameters to define "public" (obviously there is more to it, but for simplicity sake, we'll go with just that) there are a lot of areas that fall between private and public. According to the strict biblical law, carrying in a semi-private domain, like a suburban side street, is ok. The rabbis decided that carrying in a semi-private domain might lead to carrying in a public domain. Anyway, in order to mitigate the risk of carrying from a semi-private domain into a public domain, the rabbis decided to forbid carrying in a semi-public domain, unless there is an eruv. The discussion about why and what is mostly found in Gemara eruv in, although it's hard to learn practical law from it. Remember, that biblically, carrying in a semi-private domain is ok. So the rabbis did not permit something that was forbidden. They forbid something that was permitted, and then made conditions for exceptions.

Now, what's with the strings, you might ask. The simple answer is that in order for a semi-public domain to be considered "like private," it must be walled off. Like a walled city. But even walked cities have gateways. So the rabbis permitted doorways and gateways. What about a wall made completely of doorways? Yes, that's ok. What is the absolute minimum that you can call something a proper doorway? At least two poles with a string attached. And that's where the idea of an eruv being a string around an area comes from. But it's not as simple as four posts with a string connecting them. The land also has to be private. Usually the Jewish community will "lease" the land in the eruv from the city for a few dollars. There are strict rules about how far each pole can be from the next one to still be considered a doorpost, and strict rules about how the string has to be attached to be called a lintel.
>bible allows you to carry in semi public place on the Sabbath
>rabbis say dont carry in a semi public place unless there's an eruv because accidents can happen
>follow the safe way where the worst failure is still ok biblically
>be accused of not following the obligations set in the bible

Anyway there was a call between Bibi and Trump

From N12: A heated phone call between PM Netanyahu and President Trump. During the conversation, Trump made clear to Netanyahu his direction on the nuclear issue. The two had major disagreements about Iran during the talk.

According to two different sources familiar with the contents of the conversation, Trump made it clear to Netanyahu that he wants to promote the diplomatic solution with Iran and that he believes in his ability to bring about a favorable agreement—one that also meets Israel's security needs. An agreement that will achieve the common goal of both countries.
 
Why is the GOP color red and the Democrat color blue?

One may think it'd be the other way around because of the association of red with communism and socialism.

:thinking:
"We hate Communism and Marxist ideology, but we're called 'Republican' and our color is red."

Yet another example of American politics being kabuki theater. Every other developed country in the world uses the reverse colors for leftist (red) and rightist (blue) parties.

EDIT: Somewhat ninja'd by @mlanguishi
 
I said this before elsewhere and I'm gonna say it again:
Little known fact, if you say "nigger" enough times, thermodynamics bend and neuton's laws loosen, the reason those sjw cucks don't want us saying it is because they are trying to keep da hwuite man scientifically down. Its also why those filthy nwahs are allowed to say it, sjw BETAS want them to advance faster and overtake us. Wake up hwuite man.

^

This is actually how the average a&h user thinks physics work.
 
Do you feel they have a mentality of numbers equating to might? Like a swarm of ants trying to collect a crumb.
This is how the chinese, and most asian cultures, do everything. Throw a shit load of darts at the dart board without aiming and hope one will stick.

Thinking problem? Train tens of thousands of people in that field and throw them at 500 different random interpretations at the problem and hope one of them works. Don't think about it just do it and do it a lot.

Need shit built? Have millions of people start building. Where? With what? For what purpose? Stop asking questions.

Being invaded? Throw millions and millions of people armed with whatever weapons you can find at the enemy until they leave.

Nothing has changed really.
 
They have a navy. A big one. If they can control the seas they can attack and isolate a lot of countries. Then use ground forces like the Zerg.
He who controls the air controls the battlefield. The Us has 3 of the top 4 worlds largest airforces. It will be fine.
 
Why is the GOP color red and the Democrat color blue?

One may think it'd be the other way around because of the association of red with communism and socialism.

:thinking:
Like @Candlelight Desolation said, the Republicans let their political opponents control the narrative.
Red has always been the color of leftists. It became associated with the Republican Party in the late 90s because the Democrats didn't want the mask to slip.
 
Then use ground forces like the Zerg.
Doesn't work well overseas. Even if you can ship them all there the real problem is logistics, even chinese need to eat something and they need some kind of ammo even for human wave tactics.

This worked in korea and their mainland wars because they could drive trucks there, much harder to do by ship.

Also "wave management" has gotten a lot better since korea. The didn't have a-10 warthogs and spectre gunships back then. Even third world shitholes have much more resilient lmgs than we had in korea, and a lot more of them.
 
One hilarious thing to me was their response to the Golden Dome announcement. They really didn't like Trump making a nuke shield. Gee, I wonder why?
In their defence, the defacto rule of the past 70, certainly the last 30, years, has been MAD. Everyone has more nukes than anybody else can reasonably shoot down, and everyone has second strike capabilities, therefore everyone has incentive not to launch the first strike.

Building the ability to defend against nukes means the USA no longer has to worry about being hit back and could feasably nuke other countries. In that sense china would have a point... but....

That entire balance was also predicated on the assumption that world powers wouldn't completely fucking disregarded the international order system which china has wiped their ass with every day for the past 30 years in more ways than I can count, and russia gave the middle finger to when they invaded ukraine.

If you want to use a "we should all get along" approach you can't chimp out every chance you get.
 
Everyone thought it was /pol/ that would genocide the jews, instead it's /lgbt/. ngl I'm surprised myself.
I've been telling people for years the the left projects what they are on to the right, so every time those leftists were screeching about nazis they were basically giving everyone a heads up that they are actually nazis
 
I've been telling people for years the the left projects what they are on to the right, so every time those leftists were screeching about nazis they were basically giving everyone a heads up that they are actually nazis
I saw a guy once suggest it's because Fascism (see: Franco and interwar Germany) was the one thing really effective against Communism/Anarchism. Also political bogeymen reasons.
 
Maybe it's just where I live, but there are no healthy looking white children anywhere. The kids running around and going to the corner store and going to the park and mall are all broccoli haired mullato abominations in pajama pants and crocs. The only white child I've seen was my coworkers son and she's a fat single mother.... it's pretty obvious he's never gonna procreate.
Healthy white people avoid living around "diversity." It's just trailer trash and other rejects that will tolerate third worlders around them. This is consistent globally. As the diversity of a community increases, the more racially segregated communities form. LA, for example, consists of white, asian, black, and hispanic neighborhoods. It's pretty clear on a map.
1748289596818.webp

It's all part and parcel of high trust, ethnically homogeneous nations being annihilated by multicultural globalism. Whether you look at France, the UK, Canada, etc., it looks the same way. Third worlders show up, shit up an area, white population flees, country becomes segregated. Asians are just as harmful to white countries too. By outcompeting white children in schools by merit of overworking their kids to death in pursuit of white collar jobs, white students are forced to work harder to stay at the top of the school's academic ladder. It's a big reason why covertly discriminatory private schools are the way to go when educating your kids once your area gets diverse.

I'd like to see the autistic home school crowd stop being retarded and just make their own legitimate private schools with strict membership limitations. Hold it out of your church if you must, but never let the diversity in.
 
Back
Top Bottom