fggt_mcdckface
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2024
Nick RamaRama spiralling and it’s not even bodycam time yet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm aware, I'm just entertained by that. Probably something about how long I've been around PDF documents and never once connected the terms phonetically, so it's unexpected or some nonsense.This is something I keep seeing people post in the forums, and I just have to say it: this is not TikTok, Twitch, or YouTube. You can say "pedophile" instead of "PDF file", you can say "kill yourself" instead of "self delete", and "murder" instead of "unalive."
This site allows the worst slurs with basically no limit of words you can say outside of fedposting, for fuck's sake.
I think it would also be very blatantly be retaliatory. The nanny presumably has an ok to good reputation in the community and church. Nick's is worse than an unwanted pile of roadkill on your doorstep. It's best if he laid low until the stench blows over but god help him if he does an actual day of work, and his narc tendencies cannot help but sperg on social media. So back to streaming it is.He isn't going to report Jack shit, because it didn't happen. As brain damaged as Nick is at this point he understands full well that the biggest issue is the child neglect stuff and just who those people were who reported him.
The cops will do fuck all even if he tries. A year after the nanny left, whom also happened to have been a witness to trigger that mandatory reporter, Nick suddenly discovers the nanny was a thief and child abuser all along. Nobody is going to buy that.
I think Nick walks a dangerous path. So far those offline types have kept their mouths shut publicly. There will be a line there. Not only does he risk defamation, but he risks further stories of his balldoing ways coming out.
Is Karen Read the only lawsuit going on right now? I did some reading on the case and it seems like the most boring case possibly ever, yet every law streamer seems to be covering itCurrent thumbnail. It's week four, not five, btw
You know where he's getting this from, right?"Why do you caaare? It's so weiiird!"
Oooooh. I didn't think of that!Maybe he has learned that the "Rekieta Curse" is a thing and that by not predicting that the footage will never be released, he won't activate the curse in which his legal takes are almost always wrong.
My theory is Rekieta has no clue what is going on with the bodycam, and is so unsure of what is happening he is lost, reverting to his real, childish, nature full of insecurity and yellow streak fear. He has no plan for this situation, no lie big enough to tell. And he doesn't know how the bodycam has been surfaced. He is waiting for the notice from the authorities that it is being released and he said that he hasn't got that yet, and that was the closest he came to an outright cope. But he also knows that the notice will come and the bodycam footage will be released. And it is not looking good for Rekieta and his disgusting wife.Oooooh. I didn't think of that!
Though I dunno. If he's saying maybe like he's doing here, how does that affect his chances? Does it become a 50/50 thing?
No child carer in their right mind would give a child an energy drink; you're metaphorically gassing them up with jet fuel. Sure, God willing you'll get a sugar crash; but it's everything that happens between then and now that will be painful. It's double-plus retarded to think a child carer would even pay money, $150 at that, to create their own headache. I wouldn't be surprised if Nick tried to have some house rule or something about "No X-thing after Y-hour;" but the girls were having a sleep over and begged and pleased, and the nanny did a "Don't tell your dad." To me that's the most logical; if there's any truth to the nanny giving energy drinks to two adolescents. I also wouldn't be surprised if this is Nick getting as close as he can to the nanny being bad, without saying she legitimately broke the law; though he already did that by saying they also gave the kid alcohol. He's trying to shift focus off himself; because anyone with two brain cells to rub together should be saying "Your nanny wouldn't be abusing your children if you or your wife were more attentive."otherwise i will never belive that nanny would spend 150dollars on something so retarded, tho i wouldnt be surprised, if his daughter and her friend did drank monsters, after witnesing skelly drinking them.
Hoping for a sugar crash is like hoping for the kids to have a hangover. Them passing out from sugar crack doesn’t result in a cherubic, well rested and agreeable child in the immediate future.you're metaphorically gassing them up with jet fuel. Sure, God willing you'll get a sugar crash;
Seems like he's aping Juju's cutie's defense ofAfter a year of copesplaining to anyone who would listen, this is his new go-to.
Archive/Link
View attachment 7386670
Nick is such a clear-cut case of narcissism that psychology students should be lining up to interview him for their PhDs. Most narcs I've known have been able to approximately understand why people project care onto others, even if they don't experience the sensation themselves, but not so for him. The concept bewilders him, and he even feels a need to correct people of what is originally his own error, so deep does his solipsism run.After a year of copesplaining to anyone who would listen, this is his new go-to.
Archive/Link
View attachment 7386670
"Why do you caaare? It's so weiiird!"
Archive/Link
View attachment 7386680
that. I also feel he is terrified that the release of this footage is some sort of bridge too far for Lady Gollum, or someone else who he has previously told that the footage will never come out. If he breaks that promise or whatever he may suffer consequences previously promised but delayed
Who could've drank the booze in a house with 5 kids, while the parents are away for the weekend? After 4 or 5 years watching the father of the house get black out drunk every night after drinking 5 in the morning? It must be the nanny. Nobody else could've even fathomed that drinking alcohol is a fun pastime.
The balloon was filled with nitrous oxide.He tried, but the balloon was heavier than air
I love this new metric. Tweets per stream. It just shows us what gainful employment looks like.tweets During Stream (approx): 23
Exactlyshe paid 75dollars to each of them to drink monsters"
By Nick’s own logic, the nanny drinking liquor in the bedroom means that it’s impossible for it to have negatively impacted his kids in any way. She was after all, in a bedroom, where different rules apply. And according to Nick, intoxicated adults are more than capable of looking after children. What’s the issue? Because she wouldn’t fuck him?The nanny was hammering your hard liquor but you never noticed Nick? Are you that dense or away so often the Nanny had time to sober up?
Classic child abuser Nick, everyone else's fault, false or misreported, but yours.
Did you forget that April was "the nanny"?
For anyone who ever wants an answer to "Why do you care?" or "So what?" It's because we're locked in this house/city/county/state/country/planet together.