Business More than 1,000 Starbucks baristas go on strike to protest new dress code - Management and staff continue to be completely retarded

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Source: https://apnews.com/article/starbucks-dress-code-baristas-strike-3a39bbf41247d2090afa9b487ccf3d97
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/2025051...istas-strike-3a39bbf41247d2090afa9b487ccf3d97

More than 1,000 Starbucks baristas go on strike to protest new dress code​

By DEE-ANN DURBIN
Updated 3:00 PM PDT, May 14, 2025

More than 1,000 Starbucks baristas at 75 U.S. stores have gone on strike since Sunday to protest a new company dress code, a union representing the coffee giant’s workers said Wednesday.

Starbucks put new limits starting Monday on what its baristas can wear under their green aprons. The dress code requires employees at company-operated and licensed stores in the U.S. and Canada to wear a solid black shirt and khaki, black or blue denim bottoms.

Under the previous dress code, baristas could wear a broader range of dark colors and patterned shirts. Starbucks said the new rules would make its green aprons stand out and create a sense of familiarity for customers as it tries to establish a warmer, more welcoming feeling in its stores.

But Starbucks Workers United, the union that represents workers at 570 of Starbucks’ 10,000 company-owned U.S. stores, said the dress code should be subject to collective bargaining.

“Starbucks has lost its way. Instead of listening to baristas who make the Starbucks experience what it is, they are focused on all the wrong things, like implementing a restrictive new dress code,” said Paige Summers, a Starbucks shift supervisor from Hanover, Maryland. “Customers don’t care what color our clothes are when they’re waiting 30 minutes for a latte.”

Summers and others also criticized the company for selling styles of Starbucks-branded clothing that employees no longer are allowed to wear to work on an internal website. Starbucks said it would give two free black T-shirts to each employee when it announced the new dress code.

Starbucks said Wednesday that the strike was having a limited impact on its 10,000 company-operated U.S. stores. By the union’s own count, less than 1% of Starbucks workers are participating in the strikes, and in some cases the strikes closed stores for less than an hour, the company said.

“It would be more productive if the union would put the same effort into coming back to the table that they’re putting into protesting wearing black shirts to work,” Starbucks said in a statement. “More than 99% of our stores are open today serving customers — and have been all week.”

Starbucks Workers United has been unionizing U.S. stores since 2021. Starbucks and the union have yet to reach a contract agreement, despite agreeing to return to the bargaining table in February 2024.

The union said this week that it filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board alleging Starbucks’ failure to bargain over the new dress code.
 
Was there a trend of starbucks employees dressing slutty or something?
 
Was there a trend of starbucks employees dressing slutty or something?

The unionized franchises have marxoid and tranny issues. Those types of freaks have issues dressing in a presentable manner befitting an employee of a functioning business so the company is forcing the issue under the guise of some marketing gobbledygook.
 
The stricter the dress code usually means the better the place. I worked at a fast food place with an extremely strict dress code, cleanest place ever and we all worked hard as a team, everyone pulled their weight and took it seriously. Food is delicious too.
 
I would've agreed with them if the issue was having to spend additional money to conform to a company uniform code, but they made it all about crap like "self-expression" and the "Starbucks experience".
 
I said this in the other thread, but it bears repeating:

Unions are for when you work in an 1890s factory and the boss tells you to stick your arm in a machine and everyone knows full well that your arm won’t be coming out in one piece, if at all. A union for losers who pour coffee is exceptionally homosexual and needs to be scoured from existence. Especially when they throw a tantrum and strike over being told to wear a normal shirt and pants.
It's been a hundred years and unions still boil down to just another level of bureaucracy. A big club you aren't permitted into.

Unions are especially funny because in practice they're meant to leverage on behalf of their members (the regular joe; forgive the Starbucks pun) but instead prefer to rub elbows with the people who actually have something (money, power) worth bartering for. Instead of one soulless corporate entity who views you like a bead on an abacus, you now have two. Then one of them does something stupid like formally endorse Joe Biden, directly leading to your job disappearing:
unions lol.webp
“It would be more productive if the union would put the same effort into coming back to the table that they’re putting into protesting wearing black shirts to work,” Starbucks said in a statement. “More than 99% of our stores are open today serving customers — and have been all week.”
I would never endorse an employee using their key to light their place of employment on fire in protest. I also would not be surprised if it starts happening, considering the political affiliation of your average Starbucks barista.
 
Probably just a coincidence but according to someone I know who manages a fairly big local coffee chain they recently implemented the same type of dress code change as well as no piercings allowed or excessive tattoos. I honestly couldn't believe it but I guess after all the tiktoks of crying barista pooners and palestine bullshit these corpo niggers are tired of it.
 
I hate uniforms. But honestly the dress code doesnt sound so bad. I think they should try to advocate for a small raise in order to pay for their uniforms which I am certain are expected to come out of their own paycheck.
Starbucks is giving them the black shirts. Pants just need to be full length unadorned Khaki's or Jeans. This is the least oppressive dress code ever put out by a corporation. It is literally "employees must wear pants" the policy.

I suspect even the NLRB will tell the Union to Fuck Off over something this stupid.
 
It's been a hundred years and unions still boil down to just another level of bureaucracy. A big club you aren't permitted into.

Unions are especially funny because in practice they're meant to leverage on behalf of their members (the regular joe; forgive the Starbucks pun) but instead prefer to rub elbows with the people who actually have something (money, power) worth bartering for. Instead of one soulless corporate entity who views you like a bead on an abacus, you now have two. Then one of them does something stupid like formally endorse Joe Biden, directly leading to your job disappearing:
View attachment 7366976

I would never endorse an employee using their key to light their place of employment on fire in protest. I also would not be surprised if it starts happening, considering the political affiliation of your average Starbucks barista.
You’re not wrong, unions have outlived their usefulness in the modern day. Which is why I specified an 1890s factory.
 
Honest question, does anyone know someone who's a regular Starbucks visitor who's not also irritating?

I have only met a few in my life and every one of them drove me mad eventually. Costa drinkers who are just as addicted to their life giving fix never turned out to be as aggravating in my experience.
The guy that comes in and orders an espresso with a couple bucks and some change.

Vs

Dumb fat milkshake seekers.

Vs

Matcha asians

Vs

"my order is 100 percent specific to me, upside down, dry, ristretto shot with cold cream in a hot beverage"

Vs

"Do you have retarded tiktok order?"

Vs

"this is too foamy" (its standard)
 
The unionized franchises have marxoid and tranny issues. Those types of freaks have issues dressing in a presentable manner befitting an employee of a functioning business so the company is forcing the issue under the guise of some marketing gobbledygook.
My 90s teenage job required a pretty strict dress code because one fat slob would wear the same gross T-shirt that had baby spit up on it. She threw a tantrum about it and eventually the boss "found" an XXL dress shirt for her to wear, which she would try not to. It's the same reasoning behind school dress codes. Some kids ruin it for everyone between gang shit and sluts and gang sluts.

There is a very fancy coffee roaster locally where the baristas all look like luxury hotel staff. Starbucks wishes they had their clout and cool. Requiring some semblance of uniformity would help. In contrast, there's another great roaster where everyone is a happy hippy who wears their own style, there's trannies too unfortunately, but they get away with it because they're all very "aesthetic" and the talent required there seems to weed out lazy gross troons.
 
Starbucks has spent a decade courting the unwashed freaks. They should’ve known any attempt at making these people publicly acceptable would be an issue.
 
I have never noticed a Starbucks employee's clothing, but I have been massively annoyed by all the pro-gay, pro-trans, pro-leftoid signage and flyers in their stores. Maybe it would be a smarter business move, rather than saying the t-shirt has to be black, to instead stop alienating the majority of the country with political activism. Just put the coffee in the cup.
 
Starbucks has spent a decade courting the unwashed freaks. They should’ve known any attempt at making these people publicly acceptable would be an issue.
Of course they know. They very quickly figured out that offering free Neuter and Spaying Services for deranged troons as part of their day 1 employee benefits package was the height of stupidity. Making them all wear boring pants and a dress code that doesn't allow them to celebrate themselves is an exercise in outraging them and getting them to go elsewhere.
 
Starbucks put new limits starting Monday on what its baristas can wear under their green aprons. The dress code requires employees at company-operated and licensed stores in the U.S. and Canada to wear a solid black shirt and khaki, black or blue denim bottoms.
These niggas sperging out about having to wear jeans to work? The fuck were they wearing before?

t. unlimited free coffee at work therefore no need for goybucks
 
I said this in the other thread, but it bears repeating:

Unions are for when you work in an 1890s factory and the boss tells you to stick your arm in a machine and everyone knows full well that your arm won’t be coming out in one piece, if at all. A union for losers who pour coffee is exceptionally homosexual and needs to be scoured from existence. Especially when they throw a tantrum and strike over being told to wear a normal shirt and pants.
It also makes sense when there's 100+ people working at a factory, not a dozen working a single store. There are lots of Starbucks locations, if one store goes on strike, it's not going to inconvenience people much.
I have never noticed a Starbucks employee's clothing, but I have been massively annoyed by all the pro-gay, pro-trans, pro-leftoid signage and flyers in their stores. Maybe it would be a smarter business move, rather than saying the t-shirt has to be black, to instead stop alienating the majority of the country with political activism. Just put the coffee in the cup.
They tried that. Employees had an even bigger hissy fit.
 
You’re not wrong, unions have outlived their usefulness in the modern day. Which is why I specified an 1890s factory.
I dunno. I kind of like all the safety measures, free PPE, free boots, mandatory training and all the other shit the union forces the company I work for to provide and implement. It's not like industrial facilities aren't still horribly dangerous and working at them definitely still puts you at a pretty high risk of life changing injuries or death even with modern equipment and modern workplace standards. It's also not like big companies wouldn't still love to cut out as many safety programs as possible and work people to death because it costs a lot to do otherwise.
 
Back
Top Bottom