💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Pendulous Dong said:
Obviously he's going to defend KF, he paid $250 to make the Ballwasher board. I'm surprised nobody here has screenshotted any of his posts there and sent them to Jackie yet.
Click to expand...
I very nearly did after what he was saying last night (iykyk) but decided to wash my hands of this entire thing. I still support Pat's crusade against the brown subhuman hordes that make our everyday lives miserable but I'd really rather not associate with someone who's both openly pro-pedophilia AND saying things that are borderline terroristic threats.
 
Screenshot 2025-05-15 at 07.23.56.webp

What? Who says you should go to "the media" if you're being stalked? What the fuck are they going to do?

Screenshot 2025-05-15 at 07.26.40.webp

Suboptimal? Wrong, Patrick. Your life has never been better, as you have stated many thousands of times. Enjoy.

TaimuRadiu said:
Ye does not rape, he is raped. By his cousin.
Click to expand...
1000001711.webp
 
W00K #17 said:
Patposting is ded
Click to expand...
Patposting will never die since Pat lives inside all of us after we've all had some of that mysterious pepperoni at a block party.

ZipDisk said:
Possession of child rape material is in fact a crime. Pat is damn near saying as long as they don't touch kids, leave them peds alone.
Click to expand...
Isn't this the same stance that desTiny has? I'm sure there's a debate where he defends ethical CP.
 
Summer of George said:
In case there was ever any doubt, Patrick S. Tomlinson has officially absolved the Kiwi Farms and its "inhuman monsters" of any responsibility for the swattings. Threads / archive

View attachment 7363152
Click to expand...
If someone identifiably of the Ona board had bragged about swatting Patrick, it would have been blasted all over KF. The only person who’s taken responsibility is torswats, one of whose operators is in prison. (He also said Patrick paid him for self-swats but I guess we’ll leave that out for now.) It also may have triggered an LEO response targeting them. That’s never happened either.

So what the fuck is this fat man talking about? Seems like being forced to be accountable for his past actions is causing him to come up with fresh new lies. A shame he won’t just step away from social media for a little while. Would do him a world of good. But it’s Patrick.
 
Summer of George said:
In case there was ever any doubt, Patrick S. Tomlinson has officially absolved the Kiwi Farms and its "inhuman monsters" of any responsibility for the swattings. Threads / archive

View attachment 7363152
Click to expand...
So what crimes did Josh Moon personally commit by hosting this site?
Facebook was used to facilitate genocide. I'm not even kidding. They tried to get into remote countries with a news app and in Myanmar where ethno-religious tensions are high, the people there used this feature to create fake news that caused numerous ethnic and religion based massacres.
So should Mark Zuckerberg be trialed for war crimes?
Actually, yeah, he should be.
 
You know I'm going full circle now and wondering if the white darkie isn't just trolling at this point

I can't bring myself to believe someone is that retarded. It can't be true
 
AltisticRight said:
So what crimes did Josh Moon personally commit by hosting this site?
Facebook was used to facilitate genocide. I'm not even kidding. They tried to get into remote countries with a news app and in Myanmar where ethno-religious tensions are high, the people there used this feature to create fake news that caused numerous ethnic and religion based massacres.
So should Mark Zuckerberg be trialed for war crimes?
Actually, yeah, he should be.
Click to expand...
No, that's fucking stupid. We have Section 230 protections specifically so you can't arbitrarily hold CEOs responsible for genocide just because of the retardation of niggers. Zuckerberg is a tool but he is not personally responsible for some niggers deciding to kill other niggers because the niggers were so stupid that they thought the Facebook News app was the end-all-be-all for justifying mass murder of niggers.

Judge Holden said:
View attachment 7364296
View attachment 7364299

Well......thats my fucking morning ruined
Click to expand...
I know it's been trotted out before but whenever he brings up his daughter as a cudgel, I enjoy when pests remind him that he willingly gave up his parental rights, has made no effort to get them back, and in fact expressed a desire to kill her when she was in his ex-wife's womb.

Like I feel if he went in front of the court and his ex-wife and was like "I was a fucking retard to sign away those rights years ago, can we discuss visitation?" he could maybe try to work something out, but he doesn't. I guess he either hates her or just doesn't think it's important.
 
The Noise said:
Zuckerberg is a tool but he is not personally responsible for some niggers deciding to kill other niggers because the niggers were so stupid that they thought the Facebook News app was the end-all-be-all for justifying mass murder of niggers.
Click to expand...
I was joking and Myanmar is in Asia, not Africa. :geek:
 
The Noise said:
Like I feel if he went in front of the court and his wife and was like "I was a fucking retard to sign away those rights years ago, can we discuss visitation?" he could maybe try to work something out, but he doesn't. I guess he either hates her or just doesn't think it's important.
Click to expand...

Obviously the records are sealed as it was a family court matter, but a posited theory is that he actively pushed for the termination of rights and must have been very determined about it.

The basis of the theory is that serial losers with histories of drug addiction and frequent enjoyable trips to prison have asked to sever parental rights to be let off the hook for child support, but judges nearly always refuse.
As far as I understand it’s not simply just about them trying to weasel out of existing unpaid support and all future, but to do with ongoing responsibility and if the other parent dies so that the child isn’t automatically placed as ward of the state.

In Fatrick’s case too, PCJ did state that him and Adrienne attempted to arrange a visitation situation even after the severing of rights, but Fatrick outright refused.

My personal theory, based on this and knowing Fatrick’s obstinate nature, he probably thought he could use the withholding of child support as a weapon to introduce control and influence into PCJ and Adrienne’s household.
Adrienne, then free of his piggy rage, likely held her ground but told him that he shouldn’t push this as he would regret not having a relationship with the girl.
 
FinnSven said:
My personal theory, based on this and knowing Fatrick’s obstinate nature, he probably thought he could use the withholding of child support as a weapon to introduce control and influence into PCJ and Adrienne’s household.
Click to expand...

I think he's an autistic retard who viewed children as a hindrance to pretending to be a writer at Hooli's and going to Brewers games.

I also think that he thought, in his infinite (non)-wisdom he viewed severing everything as a powerplay to try and make the missus 'realize' she 'needs' him for support and he is waiting for that day she'll come crawling back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom