💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[The sticky sock]

I suppose the largest question I have at the moment is will the larger meltdown for skelly be once he is sure Josh has the footage but before it’s released OR after it’s public?

Josh is a good person, Nick would be able to swoon him into deleting the video.
Dear feeder would even get access to Nick elusive NO2 stash that Kayla or the kids don't know about.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Nick has just enlightened his audience that using and AI-generated voice of someone and pictures of people without their consent is a protected 1st amendment activity, because it is parody.

This will be his new hill he dies on. His argument is as solid as the "watermark" argument about the video in his case.

I hope we get this as a clip, its hilariously dumb.

 

[Captain Manning]

He has a right criticize a judge

Sure he does, and absolutely nothing will happen with regard to him criticizing Judge Bev.

Nor should it.

That said, you probably shouldn't do it to the one that's handling your civil case though. That could cause problems. Also, it's probably a bad idea if that same judge also hears criminal cases, and you decide to do criminal bullshit in their jurisdiction. Then you would have to file a motion to get a new judge if the docketing computer assigns your criminal bullshit to her.

I mean, I'm just saying.

 

[Oxyjen]

I am proud of Nick for finally admitting that the sex he had with Aaron wasn't consensual. Because consensually having sex with a man is gay.

We’re all just memeing that he’s talking about gay sex between him and Aaron, right?
He’s talking about Aaron and Kayla or Aaron and April?
Surely???

 

[Lian Xing]

That said, you probably shouldn't do it to the one that's handling your civil case though. That could cause problems. Also, it's probably a bad idea if that same judge also hears criminal cases, and you decide to do criminal bullshit in their jurisdiction. Then you would have to file a motion to get a new judge if the docketing computer assigns your criminal bullshit to her.

You should because it's funny and weird.

 

[Soapmore]

Whoa Buddies, I just woke up to multiple pages of Nick gesticulating wildly into the night and looking precariously close to the edge of breakdown in his stream. I want to say watching him spiral in real time is instructive, cautionary, and sad, but what really comes to mind is that it's entertaining.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Sure he does, and absolutely nothing will happen with regard to him criticizing Judge Bev.

Nor should it.

What I said, which Sean replied to, was not aimed at the content of the message, but using her likeness and voice for this kind of stuff.
If you can't do it for some small youtuber, you sure as hell can't do it with a Circuit Court judge.

You can give people the impression some of the things could have been actually said by her.

 

[Sneed Force One]

Nick has just enlightened his audience that using and AI-generated voice of someone and pictures of people without their consent is a protected 1st amendment activity, because it is parody.

This will be his new hill he dies on. His argument is as solid as the "watermark" argument about the video in his case.

I hope we get this as a clip, its hilariously dumb.

I'll refer back to this when Melton bitches out and folds on multiple C&Ds

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Nick has just enlightened his audience that using and AI-generated voice of someone and pictures of people without their consent is a protected 1st amendment activity, because it is parody.

This will be his new hill he dies on. His argument is as solid as the "watermark" argument about the video in his case.

I entered the stream merely to see what was going on, only to witness him pausing his “insightful commentary” to offer heartfelt thanks for a grand total of five gifted memberships. Nothing inherently wrong with that, of course—but truly, how far he has fallen.

Still, I remain grateful for those who are valiantly threading their way through this mind-numbingly dull livestream.

 

[Necrosan]

I suppose the largest question I have at the moment is will the larger meltdown for skelly be once he is sure Josh has the footage but before it’s released OR after it’s public?

This IS the meltdown, it's a nightmare scenario for a narcissist. The footage is coming and he doesn't have a say in it, he doesn't even know when it might drop. Imagine having a ticking time bomb in your hands that you know it's active but you don't know when it will go off. No wonder he is huffing whatever he can find and admitting to having been buttfucked.

The footage itself is going to be spectacular but I do enjoy seeing him stressed.

 

[Botchy Galoop]

his county sucks, pretty much all manual labor; Nick thinks he would be much better at hosting an AA group; he's very good with interpersonal communication

Put that Hi-Viz vest on, Nick, and get to picking up highway trash. Since you are such a slave to fashion, be sure to wear your snazzy Hot Topics belt, too.
Humble yourself. You might yet save yourself.

He says tomorrow he'll be 30 days sober.

What do you want, Nick? Your month chip?
The Internet is not an AA meeting or sponsor.
Someone who cares about this man needs to chop down his internet.

He's a regular Emma Sulkowicz.

Instead of carrying a mattress on his back, he is carrying Aaron.
No means no, Aaron.

 

[AltisticRight]

He says tomorrow he'll be 30 days sober.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

Still, I remain grateful for those who are valiantly threading their way through this mind-numbingly dull livestream.

It is my first Nick streams in multiple years. I relied on clippers, but today I wanted to see his behavior myself. Clips are fine, but they can't show his demeanor for an entire stream.

Honest question, if he asked you for change, would you give him some or take one look at those pin-prick eyes and assume he is a junkie?

 

[Vibralldo]

Been kinda slow on the front page this week. I wonder if Null is saving the next featured post for the bodycam.

Wonder if he'll release ASAP or debut/release on MATI.

When it's released he should pin it at the top of every page

 

[DemsBNutz]

We need to preserve nicks brain in a jar so future scientists can figure out what the fuck he's thinking.

Nah him and the nixon, obama and clinton heads, ( you decided which one) would argue for all Eternity about rape, dongs and deep throat... No thanks.. Unless he has a mute box installed day 1.

 

[Maude Snew]

This will be his new hill he dies on.

As the saying goes weird hill to die on but at least he'll be dead.

 

[Chazzed Up]

Nick has just enlightened his audience that using and AI-generated voice of someone and pictures of people without their consent is a protected 1st amendment activity, because it is parody.

This will be his new hill he dies on. His argument is as solid as the "watermark" argument about the video in his case.

I hope we get this as a clip, its hilariously dumb.

God Nick, you need to not tempt me. I've already been dabbling a lot with generative AI, and it has your retarded psych profile down pat. Would be a shame if that could be used to make first-amendment-protected parody.

 

[Swole McPole]

He'd never even get to them. He's never even going to get past 1.

I admit that I am powerless over my desire for Aaron Imholte and my life has become unmanagable.

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

Unless he has a mute box installed day 1.

Sounds like a short story. "I Have No Mouth and I Must Seethe"

 

[AnOminous]

Nick has just enlightened his audience that using and AI-generated voice of someone and pictures of people without their consent is a protected 1st amendment activity, because it is parody.

Just invoking "parody" like a magic word doesn't mean it legally is.