✨ Celebrity Meghan Markle / Rachel Meghan Markle / Meghan, Duchess of Sussex / Meghan Sussex / The Alliterate One - Markle Snarkle

[Fish and Chips]

Interestingly, I read that Archie was the code name security used for George.

I always wondered if Rachel = "R" + "Ch" + E" = Archie.

 

[Free the Pedos]

But the pro-Sussex brigade bring the cray just as reliably as their counterparts. They will frequently comment that William “obviously hates his wife,” that it’s a loveless marriage, etc

I remember when an ambulance was seen at their home before Kate retreated from public life due to her illness, people were out here saying Will had killed her in a rage.

 

[Fapcop]

This is sort of evergreen but a very important point about Harry is that his experience was that when he was wronged (by his mother’s untimely death), millions of people sympathized with him and gave him a lot of credit for his suffering. So it makes sense that as an adult, Harry would gravitate towards cultivating a renewed persona of a son who has been wronged again and expect to get that same sympathy, credit and goodwill. I think he’s genuinely baffled it hasn’t worked out that way.

Chase Hughes makes the point more eloquently here:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xw2dyqFaSMI

That’s a good point.

I hate to be this blasé, but lots of kids lose a parent like Harry.

Most of them don’t turn out to be assholes, nor do they reorient their entire lives around one night when they were 13.

 

[nigel p poppycock]

Interestingly, I read that Archie was the code name security used for George.

You mean William's George? So they took his first son's code name for their son???

Cabbage is a cute nickname, ngl.

 

[Rich Evans Simp]

When Catherine, the Princess of Wales was pregnant her roots started showing and it became known that she had gone gray in her 20s.

View attachment 7355656

That is far from “completely gray”.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

I always wondered if Rachel = "R" + "Ch" + E" = Archie.

Meghan has said she was a big fan of the Archie comics as a kid. But yes, Archie was George’s security moniker.

Harry claims his grandmother gave her blessing for the name Lilibet to be used, but according to those close to her it was presented as a fait accompli and she felt she didn’t have much choice but to go along with it. Royal biographer Robert Hardman quoted a staff member saying that QEII was “as angry as I’d ever seen her” when she found out Harry and Meghan had publicly claimed she had approved the name:

"I don’t own the palaces, I don’t own the paintings, the only thing I own is my name. And now they’ve taken that.”

It was all very on-brand for those two.

 

[MongInTheMirror]

What do you guys make of the idea I've seen repeated elsewhere, that Meghan stalks the comment sections of articles/forums etc replying to criticism of herself? I've seen speculation that she comments on NYT articles under the screen name 'Guest Speaker', but it was this reddit user that made me wonder yesterday. It was on a sub meant for women to rate female celebs' attractiveness, for whatever reason

First of all, holy Freudian title Batman, the entitlement leaps out at you even from the phrasing used here, and it was immediately noticed:



hmm... Seems unnecessarily salty about some random aging bit-part actress, but maybe just a particularly aggrieved Sugar?




Extreme ass-chapping detected...




'Ever'? Why would anyone be discussing men's attractiveness in a thread explicitly about Meghan Markle, in a sub for rating specific people?? Also, 'ever': have you stalked this person's entire post history just to ineffectively defend the non-annoyingness of a complete 'stranger'? I doubt even the most ardent sugars care this much.

She's also veeeeeery indignant about their reputation for being shit employers:



Obligatory inaccurate Diana comparisons, because this pathetic ratchet skank is obsessed:



of course, then she brings up Andrew, because they're comparable somehow, and it's definitely relevant in - one again - a thread specifically devoted to rating individual celebs. This dumb bitch is literally getting her back alley rhinoplasty out of joint that commentators aren't attacking Prince Andrew before daring to comment on her... in a thread... about her.

Meghan, this is why people think you're barely above the intellect of your inbred troglodyte husband.




I also suspect that the number of people other than MM who have ever contemplated Suits' cable ratings are in single digits.



picturing her expression in response to this one made me laugh. Sucking an entire orchard of lemons.

"Round? Round??!? After 9 months of dosing myself with Mounjaro?? Harry, get the Catherine voodoo doll, I need to stab something!"




"She's not problematic, she's just African- American!"

 

[John Andrews Stan]

What do you guys make of the idea I've seen repeated elsewhere, that Meghan stalks the comment sections of articles/forums etc replying to criticism of herself?

It wouldn’t surprise me but the fact is the internet is awash in stupid women with nothing better to do than defend some celebrity who wouldn’t give them the steam off her piss.

You know the type: has to quibble with every detail of what someone says, can’t accept “I don’t agree with you” and gets infuriated if you’re not willing to debate or try to persuade her. The sheer number of these MATI harpies is incalculable. Meghan doesn’t need to do it herself with so many willing to do it for free.

 

[AssignedEva]

If, by perchance, the kids were born via surrogate, what does that actually mean wrt their legitimacy in the BRF? In the hypothetical situation that Megan explodes or something and Harry begs nicely enough to be welcomed back into the fold. They're still his and her kids, right? Would they be eligible for whatever they would hypothetically be eligible for, or does using a surrogate negate that?

The biological mother (assuming her eggs were used) has to sign a parental order, which from a "legal fiction" perspective is viewed similarly to adoption. An adopted child or a child born out of wedlock would not count towards royal succession. In this scenario even if Harry is on the birth certificate, he wasn't married to the surrogate and so the child can never be heir, as royal bastards are barred from being legitimised.

That assumes the surrogacy happened in the UK, where surrogates cannot be bought (you can only pay expenses). If they'd done surrogacy in the USA then they could have paid for a surrogacy agreement which automatically made them legal parents from day one. This would then create a legal headache because if the child was recognised as their child in the USA due to a difference in law, does that trump British Royal succession law? Probably not but it's not cut and dry. Then again, at least Archie was born in the UK where an American surrogacy agreement would not be legally binding or automatically engaged with.

I don't buy that Meghan used a surrogate. Archie was conceived and born in the short window where Meghan was vaguely attempting to half-ass royal protocol and lived on Palace grounds; it would have been immensely difficult to fool the royal household staff and she must have had at least one check up with the Royal doctors even if they're not the ones who ultimately delivered the baby.

 

[squidward tentacles]

The biological mother (assuming her eggs were used) has to sign a parental order, which from a "legal fiction" perspective is viewed similarly to adoption. An adopted child or a child born out of wedlock would not count towards royal succession. In this scenario even if Harry is on the birth certificate, he wasn't married to the surrogate and so the child can never be heir, as royal bastards are barred from being legitimised.

That assumes the surrogacy happened in the UK, where surrogates cannot be bought (you can only pay expenses). If they'd done surrogacy in the USA then they could have paid for a surrogacy agreement which automatically made them legal parents from day one. This would then create a legal headache because if the child was recognised as their child in the USA due to a difference in law, does that trump British Royal succession law? Probably not but it's not cut and dry. Then again, at least Archie was born in the UK where an American surrogacy agreement would not be legally binding or automatically engaged with.

I don't buy that Meghan used a surrogate. Archie was conceived and born in the short window where Meghan was vaguely attempting to half-ass royal protocol and lived on Palace grounds; it would have been immensely difficult to fool the royal household staff and she must have had at least one check up with the Royal doctors even if they're not the ones who ultimately delivered the baby.

Oh, I don't believe it either, but it's really really funny to see it pop up on places like saintmeghanmarkle. Thank you for your explanation!

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Oh, I don't believe it either, but it's really really funny to see it pop up on places like saintmeghanmarkle

M’s loony half-sister Samantha said on loony Dan Wootton’s show that she and her father now think Meghan used a surrogate. It’s annoying that so many of her critics are obviously mental and her family’s shenanigans are the only thing that has ever made me feel sorry for her. Having your lunatic relatives run to the media has got to be the worst part of being famous.

 

[Stupid Lisa Garbageface]

M’s loony half-sister Samantha said on loony Dan Wootton’s show that she and her father now think Meghan used a surrogate. It’s annoying that so many of her critics are obviously mental and her family’s shenanigans are the only thing that has ever made me feel sorry for her. Having your lunatic relatives run to the media has got to be the worst part of being famous.

On this subject, what's the true story with Meghan's dad? The Palace Papers made it sound like he's a hapless (and maybe a little dimwitted) patsy but I haven't really dug into it any further than that.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

On this subject, what's the true story with Meghan's dad? The Palace Papers made it sound like he's a hapless (and maybe a little dimwitted) patsy but I haven't really dug into it any further than that.

Her father and half-siblings are disgusting trash. It runs in the family.

 

[MongInTheMirror]

Her father and half-siblings are disgusting trash. It runs in the family.

Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if that's exactly why she despises them as intensely as she does. They're all grifting, attention-vacuum narcs with no empathy and room temperature IQs.

She's a chip off the old Markle block, and she doesn't like being reminded.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

She's a chip off the old Markle block, and she doesn't like being reminded.

There is a rumor in pro-Meghan circles that she told her father that one of his friends/her half-brother molested her and he didn’t do anything about it and THAT’s why she cut him off. No, this makes no sense.

Speaking of theories, the latest are that Harry was ringing doorbells because he was looking for his drug dealer OR because he’d been up drugging all night at a stranger’s house and was trying to find it after leaving something behind and going back for it.

 

[Fapcop]

Her father and half-siblings are disgusting trash. It runs in the family.

Meh… Her dad might have pulled some stupid stunts but sounds like he had his heart in the right place when it came to her.

There was nothing about that that couldn’t be prevented by sending some courtiers and either scoop him up in a plane or babysit him 24-7.

My guess is that Meghan, ever status/appearance conscious resented the idea of having her, let’s be honest: Not quite royal, dad walk her down the isle, and started planting the idea of having Charles do it, very early.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Meh… Her dad might have pulled some stupid stunts but sounds like he had his heart in the right place when it came to her.

Except that he’s pulled so many stunts, often at the urging of his OTHER lunatic children and always for financial gain, deliberately fucking with M on multiple occasions. But his shady shit isn’t limited to milking his Meghan association for money. He and his kids have organized multiple GFMs for “medical bills,” netting over $60,000. Then he moved to Thailand where he and his son have been photographed with young Thai women (or Thai people who look like women). Because oh yeah, he and his son also have a history of sex tourism in Asia.

Not to mention that he falsely claimed to have had multiple heart attacks. It’s very transparently manipulative behavior and I can see Meghan learned well at his knee.

TL;DR I think her father did right by her for her entire childhood. But he’s been dodgy as hell over the past seven years. I also don’t think it’s a coincidence that all of his children (by different women) are all such garbage.

 

[Fapcop]

Except that he’s pulled so many stunts, often at the urging of his OTHER lunatic children and always for financial gain, deliberately fucking with M on multiple occasions. But his shady shit isn’t limited to milking his Meghan association for money. He and his kids have organized multiple GFMs for “medical bills,” netting over $60,000. Then he moved to Thailand where he and his son have been photographed with young Thai women (or Thai people who look like women). Because oh yeah, he and his son also have a history of sex tourism in Asia.

Not to mention that he falsely claimed to have had multiple heart attacks. It’s very transparently manipulative behavior and I can see Meghan learned well at his knee.

TL;DR I think her father did right by her for her entire childhood. But he’s been dodgy as hell over the past seven years. I also don’t think it’s a coincidence that all of his children (by different women) are all such garbage.

I don’t know if he’s a POS. Maybe.

(Shit, let’s assume that he’s a bit of a scumbag. We all know a family member or know someone who has a family member who doesn’t put them in a good light. Stuff like that, and some clips of a teary eyed Megan saying that she loves her father and has no comment besides that, would make her hella relatable. She’s too dumb and too much of a narc to see that.)

All I’m saying is, they could have handled it much better. Why the F is the brides father waddling around alone in Mexico shortly before the wedding and getting propositioned by paps?

Instead of having some minders on his ass or spending a couple of months in one of the queens numerous properties?

The reason as to why that didn’t happen I bet you, is that the dad, in Megan’s mind never was supposed to be at the wedding.

Otherwise, why not discretely tell some courtier: “BTW… There could be some problems with dear papa!”

 

[John Andrews Stan]

they could have handled it much better.

Understatement! I know they didn’t have the ability to force him to do anything, but the courtiers should have insisted on getting him tf out of Mexico and away from inevitable disaster as he was already being trolled pretty hard by media until he started colluding with them for money. The whole thing was a spectacular own goal.

 

[Fapcop]

He and his kids have organized multiple GFMs for “medical bills,” netting over $60,000. Then he moved to Thailand where he and his son have been photographed with young Thai women (or Thai people who look like women).

Meh, I ain’t going to judge. Is it scummy behavior? Sure. But I’m sure being a boomer surviving on a pension, seeing your daughter marry a multimillionaire and living the high life, and suddenly getting offers for thousands of dollars for a picture does something to you. Especially if you worked your ass off to deliver the best for her.

I know they didn’t have the ability to force him to do anything

That’s where a fat check, for wedding expenses obviously, and an offer of a three month vacation in Britain would have done the trick. “Her majesty would love it if you stayed in one of her castles!”