US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what I believe doesn't matter, nor was it even a topic when I was talking about posters in said thread being more than sus (as kids say these days), and thus being a shit example in any case.

what it is is another deflection trying to save your own ass getting called out. again, if US law is that simple, show me where the patriot act allows the infringement of your rights - because what it says and how it's used are two different things.
you being naiive enough thinking "obscene" only covers porn when even your glorified US law doesn't have a solid definition, nor thinking that there isn't vested interested in abusing such a law is hilarious tho, just like that MUH LOLI hill you for some reason are willing to die on. hitting too close to home with my initial remark?
Ah, I see. So you do think lolicon is free speech. Okay, you sick gooner.
 
We tor users leave you alone for ONE day and you all talk endlessly about online titties. It's almost as shameful as someone whose only job is to keep a website online failing to set up certificate renewals for one of his domains.
 
Ah, I see. So you do think lolicon is free speech. Okay, you sick gooner.
whatever works for you trying to save face. I'm gracious like that.

We tor users leave you alone for ONE day and you all talk endlessly about online titties. It's almost as shameful as someone whose only job is to keep a website online failing to set up certificate renewals for one of his domains.
it's the weekend, nothing's happening (nothing ever does) and plenty of free time.
 
If that makes me a baby-faced retard to you, then I wear that title proudly.
I'd never call you a retard, bud! Well, maybe as banter...

You remind me of my younger self. I simply think you'll become more jaded as you become older, and you'll probably find the candle of your faith start to dim. Because you'll see the same shit happen, over and over again. The same kind of shitty people will continue to abuse that system, and they will rub your face in it, but only subtly. Just enough for you to pick up on, even if the midwits don't notice or care.

Because you can't legislate human nature away. And yet that has become the goal of government. But, like I said, I'm pretty jaded, and I honestly hope that candle continues to burn bright for you. And I hope the system can be restored to purity, I really do. I'm simply resigned to the fact that it wont. Because there are far more people who don't care and don't want to know. Nobody wants to know how the sausage is made so long as its tasty, ya know?
 
If you are saying that it may cause government overreach boo hoo that's already happening. In fact, you should want this if you are concerned about it. Shit like SOPA/PIPA and COPPA were pushed because we have to operate under the assumption that the entire internet is accessible to children and thus has to be catered towards them. Half the legislation like it would have the wind taken out of the sails if we already age gated adult communities.
The government knows who the kids are because they're all enrolled in school and they're all given school laptops.
Here's the simple solution: make the ID requirement... but only for kids.
If you want to access a computer as a kid, you need to use your student ID or school issued device.
Patents with school-age children can set it up as a authentication cerificicate required to log into Windows or use a phone, with a 2-factor authentication override for the parents so only the children need the ID.
When a student logs in using their cerificate, they only have access to a "sandbox" internet
and can only interact and see posts or websites created by those who are in a similar grade as them (unless otherwise approved). So little Tommy can't join a Discord where he'll get groomed, since from his perspective it would only ever have people around his own age.
Filters are implemented client-side, and learning about / setting up parental controls has one parent-teacher night per school year dedicated to setting this up and updating it for the school year.
 
The government knows who the kids are because they're all enrolled in school and they're all given school laptops.
Here's the simple solution: make the ID requirement... but only for kids.
If you want to access a computer as a kid, you need to use your student ID or school issued device.
Patents with school-age children can set it up as a authentication cerificicate required to log into Windows or use a phone, with a 2-factor authentication override for the parents so only the children need the ID.
When a student logs in using their cerificate, they only have access to a "sandbox" internet
and can only interact and see posts or websites created by those who are in a similar grade as them (unless otherwise approved). So little Tommy can't join a Discord where he'll get groomed, since from his perspective it would only ever have people around his own age.
Filters are implemented client-side, and learning about / setting up parental controls has one parent-teacher night per school year dedicated to setting this up and updating it for the school year.
This honestly would work better
 
whatever works for you trying to save face. I'm gracious like that.
This is not the own that you think it is. Congratulations on taking the disgusting "MUH LOLICON IS FREE SPEECH" line of argument, though.
I'd never call you a retard, bud! Well, maybe as banter...

You remind me of my younger self. I simply think you'll become more jaded as you become older, and you'll probably find the candle of your faith start to dim. Because you'll see the same shit happen, over and over again. The same kind of shitty people will continue to abuse that system, and they will rub your face in it, but only subtly. Just enough for you to pick up on, even if the midwits don't notice or care.

Because you can't legislate human nature away. And yet that has become the goal of government. But, like I said, I'm pretty jaded, and I honestly hope that candle continues to burn bright for you. And I hope the system can be restored to purity, I really do. I'm simply resigned to the fact that it wont. Because there are far more people who don't care and don't want to know. Nobody wants to know how the sausage is made so long as its tasty, ya know?
I am pushing 40. I'm not young. I used to be a lot more jaded as a young man, but then I realized that all the doomer shit was like sucking down a bottle to drown away my sorrows (I did that, too). Trump winning in 2024 is all the evidence I need that the system is working as intended.
 
If this is real then I want every faggot who posted MIGA oh yeah Trump totally will lick Israel's boots MAGA isn't real wah wah wah to be forced into a burger suit.
The number of doomer faggots who said "THEY'LL NEVER LET TRUMP WIN, THE WORLD IS MAGIC RUN BY MAGIC CABAL!" and never put on the burger suit is quite high as well.
 
I realized that all the doomer shit was like sucking down a bottle to drown away my sorrows (I did that, too).
You are absolutely correct, here! And I know I can still live my life well despite what is, and do so. I'm not a doomer, I think. I simply refuse to cloud my objectivity with optimism, because it never worked well for me. Yet, I honestly still hope for the whole gay space communism star trek future like a bloody fool, but you know that already from the trek thread, doncha? And while I think Gene was a rotten sonuvabitch of a person, he was probably deadly accurate on one very important thing:

Humanity will have to go through Hell before we mature enough to get there.

And I think we should all be ready to buckle up, cuz we've barely hit the onramp to the Highway to Hell. I may not have much hope for today or tomorrow or next week or even next decade, but I'll be damned if I don't have it at all.

 
Last edited:
Rights? The Constitution? Free speech? Internet loicense? Nah nah nah. It's a commerce issue. Watch this.

Operate a porn site (bespoke facilitation of media intended to titillate) on U.S. soil? Immediate revocation of the relevant TINs. Class A federal misdemeanor to fiduciaries and operators.

Commercial sale of the same media (furry porn artists and other sickos)? State-imposed fines and jailtime.

Oh, that won't do anything, they'll all move to states where it's tolerated, you say! EXACTLY RIGHT. Shuttle the coom out of at-risk states like Texas all the way back to California.

Vote me for Congress, I'll get your hand off your dick quick!
This is a retarded thing that already exists. Example would be PayPal can and will revoke your account and all funds on it if an invoice or account suggests it might be for "adult" "services", whether its a joke bag of dicks you send to someone or hardcore furry porn etc.

They use the same logic for how they have de-banked Null and the Farms. Its considered high risk or whatever and they just write it off that they are legally not forced to allow you to exchange money.

Assuming it is for a legal service/commodity there should be no reason a bank or service provider should be able to stop you from giving someone else money.
 
based off the books i read about it, it was primarily due to the church's practice of polygamy and the threat of Mormons being more loyal to the Church than to the usa. im not a scholar ofc.

i do think the argument in reynolds v. United States, 1879 about polygamy being a banned religious practice makes sense but why allow native americans to have an exemption to drug laws allowing them to have peyote or the endangered species act allowing them to have eagle feathers
The exceptions do not allow Native Americans to just go pluck feathers. The obtain them through the US government’s National Eagle Repository in the US fish and Wildlife Service. They receive dead eagles and distribute the feathers. They aren’t endangered any more.

As for peyote, the tribes obtain it in sustainable ways. The big threats to peyote are habitat loss, illegal poaching, and destruction by feral pigs. Habitat loss is the most significant of the three.
 
Back
Top Bottom