US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mBvWTf3B5h4
You guys remember when we fought World War 2 the Germans started and ended the war with may more advanced tech and fancy military toys but at kinda low volume and America beat them by just Mcdonaldsing their ass and bringing 11 Shermans to fight every 1 tiger, basically we destroyed them with production and logistics

some know me one here, im a retard but I know a little history, I ask all willing to engage with this point seriously, if china started, tommorow making these with bombs on them and tells us

"we are going to start sinking ever single navy vessel under a US flag we find within our territorial waters, This includes the Island of Taiwan, any use of nuclear weapons from any nation will result in a total use of all Chinese Nuclear weapons onto American citys, however we will not use a 1st strike nuclear policy"

Short of us using nuclear weapons how do we credibly go up against a never ending supply of cheap drones? Only strategic bombers could reach as far as China from US soil and we have less than 200 of those, they would be gone in a month of continuous strikes. Hell we allow the use of modern strike aircraft and it only buys us another 1,500 or so.

I think we might have been outmaneuvered on this one and its kinda just a matter of time but Im open to be shown another perspective, if you wanna ad hominem me thats fine just please have a concrete reason why my logic is wrong aswell please
China is a paper tiger. Their power is mainly based off of appearances. The People's Liberation Army hasn't fought a war since 1979. Who knows how drone warfare would work against Taiwan or any of China's neighbors.

China's Achilles Heel is the 3 Gorges Dam. I've already mention that one bad rainy season could cause it to self destruct. A powerful explosive could take it out. With it, a lot of china.
 
China is a paper tiger. Their power is mainly based off of appearances. The People's Liberation Army hasn't fought a war since 1979. Who knows how drone warfare would work against Taiwan or any of China's neighbors.

China's Achilles Heel is the 3 Gorges Dam. I've already mention that one bad rainy season could cause it to self destruct. A powerful explosive could take it out. With it, a lot of china.
They also don't have a blue water navy of any significant size. Their airforce is outdated even though they've been trying to upgrade it to modern standards. Their nukes are probably at least half filled with Water. If the Soviets/Russians are any indication, they have corruption all throughout the military and most of their soldiers are probably not up to Western standards in terms of fitness, training or overall skill.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mBvWTf3B5h4
You guys remember when we fought World War 2 the Germans started and ended the war with may more advanced tech and fancy military toys but at kinda low volume and America beat them by just Mcdonaldsing their ass and bringing 11 Shermans to fight every 1 tiger, basically we destroyed them with production and logistics

some know me one here, im a retard but I know a little history, I ask all willing to engage with this point seriously, if china started, tommorow making these with bombs on them and tells us

"we are going to start sinking ever single navy vessel under a US flag we find within our territorial waters, This includes the Island of Taiwan, any use of nuclear weapons from any nation will result in a total use of all Chinese Nuclear weapons onto American citys, however we will not use a 1st strike nuclear policy"

Short of us using nuclear weapons how do we credibly go up against a never ending supply of cheap drones? Only strategic bombers could reach as far as China from US soil and we have less than 200 of those, they would be gone in a month of continuous strikes. Hell we allow the use of modern strike aircraft and it only buys us another 1,500 or so.

I think we might have been outmaneuvered on this one and its kinda just a matter of time but Im open to be shown another perspective, if you wanna ad hominem me thats fine just please have a concrete reason why my logic is wrong aswell please
You are really underestimating the capabilities of a bog standard surface warships to do everything from close in defense to, to electronics warfare to just being to able to take hits and keep fighting anyway.

That entire drone swarm could easily be shredded by one of the Sea Wizards, incidentally.

 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=mBvWTf3B5h4
You guys remember when we fought World War 2 the Germans started and ended the war with may more advanced tech and fancy military toys but at kinda low volume and America beat them by just Mcdonaldsing their ass and bringing 11 Shermans to fight every 1 tiger, basically we destroyed them with production and logistics

some know me one here, im a retard but I know a little history, I ask all willing to engage with this point seriously, if china started, tommorow making these with bombs on them and tells us

"we are going to start sinking ever single navy vessel under a US flag we find within our territorial waters, This includes the Island of Taiwan, any use of nuclear weapons from any nation will result in a total use of all Chinese Nuclear weapons onto American citys, however we will not use a 1st strike nuclear policy"

Short of us using nuclear weapons how do we credibly go up against a never ending supply of cheap drones? Only strategic bombers could reach as far as China from US soil and we have less than 200 of those, they would be gone in a month of continuous strikes. Hell we allow the use of modern strike aircraft and it only buys us another 1,500 or so.

I think we might have been outmaneuvered on this one and its kinda just a matter of time but Im open to be shown another perspective, if you wanna ad hominem me thats fine just please have a concrete reason why my logic is wrong aswell please
Those drones won't even be able to reach a ship before running out of battery.

Also, that's literally a CCP propaganda video of a light show.
 
I noticed that leftist humor often focuses on "shock" humor. But, in this post-internet world, very little is actually "shocking" compared to the perversion and gore we've already seen, so leftist "humor" just comes off as pointless vulgarity and isn't funny.
I think about this a lot, but not in just a "leftist comedy" way but for all of modern comedy as a whole. It's harder than ever to write any funny comedy these days not because of censorship or anything, instead it's because reality around us is so insane that any fake humor people write up pales in comparison to the real deal. Reality being filmed 24/7 means people have more access to this insanity than ever.

Most people would get far more laughs watching videos of retards getting arrested or following lolcows instead of watching a modern comedy movie or tv show, I'd much rather just keep up with King Cobra instead of following any modern comedy tv show. I don't know how they do Weekend Update on SNL anymore because I can't imagine writing anything more insane than the actual headlines we get in the news. We no longer really have need for any satirical magazines or the likes because you would probably laugh more just reading normal news, although Babylon Bee is pretty funny most of the times you could easily mistake those fake headlines for a real one.
 
You are really underestimating the capabilities of a bog standard surface warships to do everything from close in defense to, to electronics warfare to just being to able to take hits and keep fighting anyway.
The way you defeat those tiny little swarm drones is by being more than five miles away.
 
The only way out I can see is to segrigate the kids from accessing content. Personally, I think we should just block anyone from under 18 from the internet, but, that would require parents actually take responsibility and good luck with that.
Actually, we could do this on a device level instead of an internet level.
There are already things like bark phones (I think the brand is called), which allows monitoring of everything by the parent, contacts can't be added without the parent approving it, apps can't be installed without the parent approving it, browsers can't be installed, etc.
It's not only much more extensive than parental controls on typical phones, but the controls are the default.

Yes there are tablets people buy for their kids, but it doesn't go far enough and parental controls are sometimes obtuse and confusing and it still allows things like kids youtube which is full of slop.
I'd personally love to see an actual PC (with keyboard and monitor and all so it isn't portable), with these settings defaulted.

Browsers can't be installed. No internet access unless it's granted for specific uses (like one website that the parent approves specifically), applications are kid friendly only (no games or applications with interaction with mixed groups like roblox, unless it's on a private server with approved contacts like Minecraft, nothing with paid content, install with parental approval only, etc), keylogger that alerts the parent if anything concerning is typed, no webcam can be installed.

If you had kid friendly machines ready out of the box like this I think it would go a long way. Often kids use their parents phone or computer if they don't have their own and that means open access. If the answer is "no, use your own" and theirs is locked down there would be no need for IDs or anything like that.

The big thing would be making these locked down options easy to set up, most options already set up out of the box, and easy to understand like the kid phones.

Once the bark phones came out (and similar options) I've seen bigger and bigger social pressure from moms not to let your kid have a regular phone, especially not a smartphone because they're "unsafe", "full of predators", "more trouble than they're worth" but they still want their kid to have a way to contact them if there's an emergency away from home.

I think similar might happen with computers. "You let your kid on your computer? There's no way I would do that! There's so many predators online. My kid used the Pluto computer for his school.".

Rate me optimistic but I think consumer friendly kid safe options plus societal pressure/shaming and education could go a hell of a long way toward this problem.
A lot of parents are already realizing social media isn't safe for kids, even normies.
 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=lO-TaVGEryE
worst case worst you end up in a situation like with UKR/RUS where EW is so prolific that all drones have fiber optic cables connecting them to their operator and the entire battlefield looks like this

View attachment 7341230
seen it, that video is AI, a mockup of what it might be able to do. Anduril is competing for the "golden dome" contract and have had reason to make themselves look good.

One way suicide drones are starting to be the new meta, no controller, no networking, no frequency. Just pre programed killing machine that will loiter in the area until its battery gets low enough it will turn around automatically or find a new target. It unironically better than an Ai controlled swarm cause some smart people know how to use their networking and frequency against them.

These new suicide drones are insane, only way to disable it is kinetic force either bullet or missile, you cant jam them, cant pick most up on radar, and worst of all you cant stop the 2nd one even if by some miracle you thwarted the first.

Its a race to figure out how to stop electricity working at range
 
China is a paper tiger. Their power is mainly based off of appearances. The People's Liberation Army hasn't fought a war since 1979. Who knows how drone warfare would work against Taiwan or any of China's neighbors.

China's Achilles Heel is the 3 Gorges Dam. I've already mention that one bad rainy season could cause it to self destruct. A powerful explosive could take it out. With it, a lot of china.
Shenzen,Guanzhou, Shanghai are all within strike distance of Taiwan. China is centralized around it's 4 Tier 1s.
 
You are really underestimating the capabilities of a bog standard surface warships to do everything from close in defense to, to electronics warfare to just being to able to take hits and keep fighting anyway.

That entire drone swarm could easily be shredded by one of the Sea Wizards, incidentally.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=75vfFcewkP8
Ok heard, how much ammo does it have? how much ammo is on board? that swarm in the video is like 1 day of production at 1 factory.

you know what losing 1 aircraft carrier would do to us on morale level? a whole city of men and equipment lost to a few hundred thousand dollars of plastic?

its an unwinnable fight without a force multiplier, you have to knock out the swarms at an electric level, kinetic projectiles are unironically to expensive to sustain cover, not on a production level but a weight level.
 
Actually, we could do this on a device level instead of an internet level.
If you had kid friendly machines ready out of the box like this I think it would go a long way. Often kids use their parents phone or computer if they don't have their own and that means open access. If the answer is "no, use your own" and theirs is locked down there would be no need for IDs or anything like that.
the pornhub ethicist rabbi essentially had the same take, creating devices that are kid friendly by default and have to be flagged as adult owned
 
Ok heard, how much ammo does it have? how much ammo is on board? that swarm in the video is like 1 day of production at 1 factory.

you know what losing 1 aircraft carrier would do to us on morale level? a whole city of men and equipment lost to a few hundred thousand dollars of plastic?

its an unwinnable fight without a force multiplier, you have to knock out the swarms at an electric level, kinetic projectiles are unironically to expensive to sustain cover, not on a production level but a weight level.
Just ignoring that A carrier group doesn't need to be near China to strike China. We can hit targets a thousand miles away if we wanted too and just endlessly sortie aircraft to bomb the Chinese mainland into submission. Even if we didn't somehow have a way to deal with those drones, which again we could just shoot them down, those Drones aren't getting to a carrier. The carrier would just stay outside their effective range and we'd sink any naval vessels coming towards the group, even though the Chinese, again, don't really have a blue water navy.
 
i bet that nigger doesnt call mexicans southern usonians or unitedstatetiansmexicanis
mexico is actually the United States of Mexico. USM, if you will
I've been living in this country my entire life and I've never fucking heard of "Usonian"
South Americans, who no one actually calls Americans, seethe when people call Americans Americans. Keep in mind, Brazil is also the United States of Brazil, Mexico is the United States of Mexico, and so on and so forth.


A Most Sensitive Subject in the White House: Where Is Melania?​

nyt accidentally confirms trump as first gay president

View attachment 7340305
She's clearly on a world tour with the trench coat and hat outfit she likes. Your goal is to find her.

I'll do you one better.

5.56 is good enough for hordes of TEMU drones.
 
Back
Top Bottom