One big headache if you ask me. To willingly bend your politics over one mans words, no matter who, it's difficult to digest. I can say I support all His Holiness' beliefs but deep down inside that's not true. How do you stop yourself from holding old beliefs in order to follow a new set that you wish to uphold. Does that even make any sense.
I get it, tying yourself to one man's word is a headache. But hey, if God tells me His Holiness will get the important things, like theology, right then surely his politics can't be too bad.
Don't really understand what this part means. Also hope you are doing well fren.
How... Insensitive.
Do you read your own sources?
Sperging about darkies leads you closer to Christ, Don’t you know?
Tell them that your fish are in season are of regulated size, they can’t look inside your cooler without a warrantWhat do I say to the missionaries when they arrive upon my heathen shores? Are they gonna try and Jehovah's Witness me?
I'm not a Catholic (actually, I am an excommunicant heretic in the eyes of the Vatican), but this part of your argument doesn't exactly foster confidence in your ability to understand finer points of Catholic doctrine. I see what you're trying to argue here, but it relies on the text of the current Code of Canon Law, which was promulgated and took effect in 1983. Pope Honorius I died in the early 7th century, over a millennium before it was written. Canon law censures, like Honorius' anathema, can be posthumous, but they aren't usually retroactive. There are strict definitions for when an automatic penalty is applied, and nothing that would suggest it would be incurred by someone acting under duress more than 1300 years ago.
No, this is a cat owner appreciation thread, don’t know why theirs so Many Catholics here
